J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791539
Review Article

Craniotomy versus Decompressive Craniectomy in Acute Subdural Hematoma Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

1   Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
,
Maryam Sabah Al-Jebur
2   College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
,
Yezan Al-Salihi
2   College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
,
Elias Dumour
3   Department of Paediatric Neurosurgery, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
,
Ahmed Saleh
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar
,
Mhran Daie
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar
,
Firas Hammadi
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar
,
Ali Ayyad
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar
5   Department of Neurosurgery, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Background This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of decompressive craniectomy (DC) and craniotomy in treating acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) to provide a more precise assessment of the procedures' outcomes.

Methods We searched for relevant articles in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane till August 2023, including cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing craniotomy and DC for ASDH. The analysis was conducted using “Review Manager” software, using the risk ratio along with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for categorical data, whereas continuous data were analyzed using the mean difference (MD) and 95% CI.

Results Our analysis included 13 studies with a total of 4,689 patients, of whom 1,910 (40.7%) underwent DC and 2,779 (59.3%) underwent craniotomy. The results revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of craniotomy concerning good recovery in delayed GOS (risk ratio [RR] = 1.42; 95% CI [1.12, 1.81]), postoperative mortality (RR = 0.81; 95% CI [0.71, 0.94]), mortality at last follow-up (RR = 0.75; 95% CI [0.62, 0.91]), and hospital stay (MD = –3.71; 95%CI [–5.82, –1.60]). A nonsignificant difference (RR = 1.06; 95% CI [0.52, 2.17]; p = 0.87) was found between the two interventions concerning seizures.

Conclusion Despite craniotomy's favorable clinical outcomes and mortality rates, the significant baseline differences between DC and craniotomy make these data inconclusive. To establish solid evidence regarding the use of DC versus craniotomy in ASDH, it is necessary to conduct well-controlled randomized studies with large sample sizes.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 05 March 2024

Accepted: 14 August 2024

Article published online:
08 October 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Servadei F, Nasi MT, Giuliani G. et al. CT prognostic factors in acute subdural haematomas: the value of the “worst” CT scan. Br J Neurosurg 2000; 14 (02) 110-116
  • 2 Woertgen C, Rothoerl RD, Schebesch KM, Albert R. Comparison of craniotomy and craniectomy in patients with acute subdural haematoma. J Clin Neurosci 2006; 13 (07) 718-721
  • 3 Pierre LKN. Subdural Hematoma. Treasure Island, FL:: StatPearls Publishing;; 2023
  • 4 Karibe H, Hayashi T, Hirano T, Kameyama M, Nakagawa A, Tominaga T. Surgical management of traumatic acute subdural hematoma in adults: a review. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2014; 54 (11) 887-894
  • 5 Schirmer CM, Ackil Jr AA, Malek AM. Decompressive craniectomy. Neurocrit Care 2008; 8 (03) 456-470
  • 6 Honeybul S, Ho KM. The current role of decompressive craniectomy in the management of neurological emergencies. Brain Inj 2013; 27 (09) 979-991
  • 7 Kurland DB, Khaladj-Ghom A, Stokum JA. et al. Complications associated with decompressive craniectomy: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 2015; 23 (02) 292-304
  • 8 Guerra WK, Gaab MR, Dietz H, Mueller JU, Piek J, Fritsch MJ. Surgical decompression for traumatic brain swelling: indications and results. J Neurosurg 1999; 90 (02) 187-196
  • 9 Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Ahn ES, Aresco C, Scalea TM, Eisenberg HM. Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury. J Neurosurg 2006; 104 (04) 469-479
  • 10 Pillai A, Menon SK, Kumar S, Rajeev K, Kumar A, Panikar D. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: an analysis of long-term outcome and factors in patient selection. J Neurosurg 2007; 106 (01) 59-65
  • 11 Coplin WM, Cullen NK, Policherla PN. et al. Safety and feasibility of craniectomy with duraplasty as the initial surgical intervention for severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2001; 50 (06) 1050-1059
  • 12 Lonjaret L, Guyonnet M, Berard E. et al. Postoperative complications after craniotomy for brain tumor surgery. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2017; 36 (04) 213-218
  • 13 Kolias AG, Belli A, Li LM. et al. Primary decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural haematomas: results of an international survey. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012; 154 (09) 1563-1565
  • 14 Rush B, Rousseau J, Sekhon MS, Griesdale DE. Craniotomy versus craniectomy for acute traumatic subdural hematoma in the United States: a national retrospective cohort analysis. World Neurosurg 2016; 88: 25-31
  • 15 Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J. et al; Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Author Group. Surgical management of acute epidural hematomas. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (03) S7-S15 , discussionSi-iv
  • 16 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372 (71) n71
  • 17 Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC. et al; Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928
  • 18 Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D. et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analysis. . Clin Epidemiol 2000. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
  • 19 Azouz HM, Soffar HMH, Abbass WA, Ahmed AE-s, El-far MT. Comparative study between the outcome of decompressive craniotomy versus craniectomy in the management of acute subdural hematoma. Egypt J Neurosurg 2023; 38 (01) 30
  • 20 Hutchinson PJ, Adams H, Mohan M. et al; British Neurosurgical Trainee Research Collaborative, NIHR Global Health Research Group on Acquired Brain and Spine Injury, and RESCUE-ASDH Trial Collaborators, RESCUE-ASDH Trial Collaborators. Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma. N Engl J Med 2023; 388 (24) 2219-2229
  • 21 Tsermoulas G, Shah O, Wijesinghe HE, Silva AHD, Ramalingam SK, Belli A. Surgery for acute subdural hematoma: replace or remove the bone flap?. World Neurosurg 2016; 88: 569-575
  • 22 Shibahashi K, Sugiyama K, Tomio J, Hoda H, Morita A. In-hospital mortality and length of hospital stay with craniotomy versus craniectomy for acute subdural hemorrhage: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis. J Neurosurg 2019; 133 (02) 504-513
  • 23 Kwon YS, Yang KH, Lee YH. Craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematomas: surgical selection and clinical outcome. Korean J Neurotrauma 2016; 12 (01) 22-27
  • 24 Ahmed N, Greenberg P, Shin SH. Pulmonary complications and sepsis following severe acute subdural hematoma in patients who underwent craniotomy versus craniectomy: a propensity score matched analysis. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2020; 81 (04) 297-301
  • 25 Chen SH, Chen Y, Fang WK, Huang DW, Huang KC, Tseng SH. Comparison of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy in severely head-injured patients with acute subdural hematoma. J Trauma 2011; 71 (06) 1632-1636
  • 26 Ahmed N, Greenberg P, Shin S. Mortality outcome of emergency decompressive craniectomy and craniotomy in the management of acute subdural hematoma: a national data analysis. Am Surg 2021; 87 (03) 347-353
  • 27 Ruggeri AG, Cappelletti M, Tempestilli M, Fazzolari B, Delfini R. Surgical management of acute subdural hematoma: a comparison between decompressive craniectomy and craniotomy on patients treated from 2010 to the present in a single center. J Neurosurg Sci 2022; 66 (01) 22-27
  • 28 Li LM, Kolias AG, Guilfoyle MR. et al. Outcome following evacuation of acute subdural haematomas: a comparison of craniotomy with decompressive craniectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012; 154 (09) 1555-1561
  • 29 Anis SB, Khan SA, Mitha R, Shamim MS. Craniotomy or craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma? Difference in patient characteristics and outcomes at a tertiary care hospital. Asian J Neurosurg 2022; 17 (04) 563-567
  • 30 Phan K, Moore JM, Griessenauer C. et al. Craniotomy versus decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2017; 101: 677-685.e2
  • 31 Mahadewa TGB, Mardhika PE, Maliawan S, Golden N, Awyono S, Ryalino C. Comparison of clinical outcome between craniectomy and craniotomy as surgical management of traumatic acute subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2020; 8: 137-142
  • 32 Kim SP, Kang DS, Cheong JH, Kim JH, Song KY, Kong MH. Clinical analysis of epidural fluid collection as a complication after cranioplasty. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2014; 56 (05) 410-418
  • 33 Zanaty M, Chalouhi N, Starke RM. et al. Complications following cranioplasty: incidence and predictors in 348 cases. J Neurosurg 2015; 123 (01) 182-188
  • 34 Hanif S, Abodunde O, Ali Z, Pidgeon C. Age related outcome in acute subdural haematoma following traumatic head injury. Ir Med J 2009; 102 (08) 255-257
  • 35 Taussky P, Widmer HR, Takala J, Fandino J. Outcome after acute traumatic subdural and epidural haematoma in Switzerland: a single-centre experience. Swiss Med Wkly 2008; 138 (19–20): 281-285
  • 36 van Leeuwen N, Lingsma HF, Perel P. et al; International Mission on Prognosis and Clinical Trial Design in TBI Study Group, Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury Trial Collaborators, Trauma Audit and Research Network. Prognostic value of major extracranial injury in traumatic brain injury: an individual patient data meta-analysis in 39,274 patients. Neurosurgery 2012; 70 (04) 811-818 , discussion 818
  • 37 Dent DL, Croce MA, Menke PG. et al. Prognostic factors after acute subdural hematoma. J Trauma 1995; 39 (01) 36-42 , discussion 42–43
  • 38 Wilberger Jr JE, Harris M, Diamond DL. Acute subdural hematoma: morbidity, mortality, and operative timing. J Neurosurg 1991; 74 (02) 212-218
  • 39 Cagetti B, Cossu M, Pau A, Rivano C, Viale G. The outcome from acute subdural and epidural intracranial haematomas in very elderly patients. Br J Neurosurg 1992; 6 (03) 227-231
  • 40 Seelig JM, Becker DP, Miller JD, Greenberg RP, Ward JD, Choi SC. Traumatic acute subdural hematoma: major mortality reduction in comatose patients treated within four hours. N Engl J Med 1981; 304 (25) 1511-1518
  • 41 Haselsberger K, Pucher R, Auer LM. Prognosis after acute subdural or epidural haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1988; 90 (3-4): 111-116
  • 42 Kotwica Z, Jakubowski JK. Head-injured adult patients with GCS of 3 on admission–who have a chance to survive?. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1995; 133 (1–2): 56-59
  • 43 Chamoun RB, Robertson CS, Gopinath SP. Outcome in patients with blunt head trauma and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 at presentation. J Neurosurg 2009; 111 (04) 683-687
  • 44 Vilcinis R, Bunevicius A, Tamasauskas A. The association of surgical method with outcomes of acute subdural hematoma patients: experience with 643 consecutive patients. World Neurosurg 2017; 101: 335-342