The Neck-Crossing Technique Using the Low-Profile Distal Access Catheter in Flow Diverter Placement for Dissecting Posterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysm: A Case Report

Abstract

We report a case in which a novel distal access catheter proved successful in the placement of a flow diverter for a challenging distal cerebral artery lesion. We discuss the advantages and pitfalls of this technique and considerations for its use. A 74-year-old female presented with intermittent headaches, and was diagnosed with a dissecting aneurysm at the proximal right posterior cerebral artery with a sharp bleb, measuring 9.8 mm in diameter. Given the complex vascular anatomy, stent-assisted coil embolization was initially considered but deemed high risk for dual catheter for jailing technique with 6-Fr size guiding catheter due to the tortuosity and stenosis of the parent vessel. Therefore, we opted for flow diverter treatment, which presented its challenges during delivery. By employing a low-profile distal access catheter, Phenom Plus (outer diameter: 4.2-Fr. inner diameter: 1.13 mm; Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States), with a minimal ledge between it and the delivery catheter, Phenom 27 (outer diameter: 2.8-Fr, 0.91 mm; Medtronic), we successfully crossed the neck of the aneurysm with Phenom Plus and placed the flow diverter. While acknowledging potential risks, this case demonstrates the value of the neck-crossing technique using a low-profile distal access catheter as an alternative option for treating challenging peripheral artery aneurysms with flow diverters. This technique offers promise in specific situations where conventional methods pose challenges.

Keywords

dissectiong posterior cerebral artery aneurysm - flow diverter treatment - neck-crossing technique - low-profile distal access catheter - pipeline flex embolization device with shield technology

Note

Written informed consent was obtained for the treatment, including the off-label use of Pipeline Shield and the publication of this case report. This study was performed by the ethics committee guidelines and principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Authors' Contributions

A.H. and I.N. helped in patient care and data collection, contributed substantially to the conception or design of the work, the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work, drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content, provided final approval of the version to be published, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. K.S., S.M., J.M., T.H., J.T., S.W., T.S., and J.K. helped in patient care and data collection. revised the work critically for important intellectual content, provided final approval of the version to be published, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Publication History

Article published online:
24 October 2024

• References

• 1 Kühn AL, Gounis MJ, Puri AS. Introduction: history and development of flow diverter technology and evolution. Neurosurgery 2020; 86 (Suppl. 01) S3-S10
• 2 Shehata MA, Ibrahim MK, Ghozy S. et al. Long-term outcomes of flow diversion for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2023; 15 (09) 898-902
• 3 Akmangit I, Aydin K, Sencer S. et al. Dual stenting using low-profile LEO baby stents for the endovascular management of challenging intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36 (02) 323-329
• 4 Martínez-Galdámez M, Lamin SM, Lagios KG. et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flex embolization device with shield technology: angiographic and safety outcomes at 1-year follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 11 (04) 396-399
• 5 Waqas M, Vakharia K, Dossani RH. et al. Transradial access for flow diversion of intracranial aneurysms: case series. Interv Neuroradiol 2021; 27 (01) 68-74
• 6 Werner CD, Mathkour M, Scullen TA, McCormack EP, Lockwood JD, Amenta PS. Transradial access for anterior circulation deployment of pipeline embolization device: a case report, literature review, and technical note. Brain Circ 2021; 7 (02) 118-123
• 7 Park W, Kwon DH, Ahn JS, Lee SH, Park JC, Kwun BD. Treatment strategies for dissecting aneurysms of the posterior cerebral artery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2015; 157 (10) 1633-1643
• 8 Hou K, Lv X, Yu J. Endovascular treatment of posterior cerebral artery trunk aneurysm: the status quo and dilemma. Front Neurol 2022; 12: 746525
• 9 Awad AJ, Mascitelli JR, Haroun RR, De Leacy RA, Fifi JT, Mocco J. Endovascular management of fusiform aneurysms in the posterior circulation: the era of flow diversion. Neurosurg Focus 2017; 42 (06) E14
• 10 Martínez-Galdámez M, Biondi A, Kalousek V. et al. Periprocedural safety and technical outcomes of the new Silk Vista Baby flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: results from a multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 11 (07) 723-727
• 11 Hagen MW, Girdhar G, Wainwright J, Hinds MT. Thrombogenicity of flow diverters in an ex vivo shunt model: effect of phosphorylcholine surface modification. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9 (10) 1006-1011
• 12 Vollherbst DF, Lücking H, DuPlessis J. et al. The FRESH study: treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the new FRED X flow diverter with antithrombotic surface treatment technology-first multicenter experience in 161 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023; 44 (04) 474-480
• 13 Yoshizawa K, Kobayashi H, Kaneki A. et al. Poly(2-methoxyethyl acrylate) (PMEA) improves the thromboresistance of FRED flow diverters: a thrombogenic evaluation of flow diverters with human blood under flow conditions. J Neurointerv Surg 2023; 15 (10) 1001-1006
• 14 Suyama K, Nakahara I, Matsumoto S. et al. Efficacy of the flow re-direction endoluminal device for cerebral aneurysms and causes of failed deployment. Neuroradiology 2022; 64 (06) 1213-1219