Subscribe to RSS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60f12/60f1207d64e709348d01b6a01c0352d16ea3240a" alt=""
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791745
Plagiarism in Publications: All about Being Fair!
Funding None.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e90df/e90df08dee476516604c86bb46b0b3790744885f" alt=""
Abstract
Upholding the highest standards of publication ethics is critical for ensuring the integrity of scholarly work, maintaining public trust, and advancing knowledge responsibly in academia. Plagiarism, defined as intellectual theft, is a significant ethical issue that undermines these principles. There are many forms of plagiarism, including direct, self, mosaic, and accidental plagiarism. Plagiarism is prevalent across the globe, but the problem is worse in developing countries due to numerous factors, such as social and economic conditions and lack of knowledge. The digital age has further exacerbated the situation, as easy access to artificial intelligence and online content facilitates plagiarism. To combat this problem, it is essential to recognize the importance of originality and the consequences of plagiarism, including damage to one's professional reputation, legal repercussions, and loss of credibility and trust. Educational institutions and publishers can play a crucial role in promoting a culture of fairness by implementing clear guidelines, providing training on ethical research practices, and enforcing strict consequences for violations. By encouraging an environment that values honesty, transparency, and respect for intellectual property, the academic community can uphold high ethical standards and contribute to the evolution of knowledge with integrity.
Note
This manuscript was presented as a webinar in the online series “Scientific Publications in Radiology” on November 26, 2023, organized by IRIA/ICRI.
Publication History
Article published online:
09 January 2025
© 2025. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Kusumoto FM, Bittl JA, Creager MA. et al; ACC's Scientific Publications Committee's Peer Review Work Group. High-quality peer review of clinical and translational research: a practical guide. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 78 (15) 1564-1568
- 2 Stephens MM. Plagiarism: an unprofessional and dishonest trend creeping into modern writing of research and review papers. Foot Ankle Surg 2009; 15 (02) 57
- 3 Ibrahim S. Plagiarism: the bane of publishing. Malays Orthop J 2015; 9 (02) 1
- 4 University of Oxford. Plagiarism. Accessed September 25, 2024 at: https://www.ox.ac.uk/students/academic/guidance/skills/plagiarism
- 5 Worthington J. The use of artificial intelligence in meeting legal requirements for educating students with disabilities. 2024 . Accessed September 11, 2024 at: https://njpsa.org/the-use-artificial-intelligence-in-meeting-legal-requirements-for-educating-students-with-disabilities/
- 6 Scendoni R, Tomassini L, Cingolani M, Perali A, Pilati S, Fedeli P. Artificial intelligence in evaluation of permanent impairment: new operational frontiers. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11 (14) 1979
- 7 Resnik DB, Dinse GE. Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings. J Med Ethics 2013; 39 (01) 46-50
- 8 Chaddah P. Not all plagiarism requires a retraction. Nature 2014; 511 (7508) 127
- 9 Kambhampati SBS, Menon J, Maini L. Ethics in research and publications. Indian J Orthop 2023; 57 (11) 1722-1734
- 10 Norman I, Griffiths P. Duplicate publication and “salami slicing”: ethical issues and practical solutions. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45 (09) 1257-1260
- 11 Lalwani N. Publication ethics: an insight from a Figley Fellow. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 214 (01) 1-2
- 12 Garcia LA. Examining the increasing prevalence of academic dishonesty: an investigation of student perceptions of academic integrity in higher education in the digital age [master's thesis]. Edinburg: The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; 2023
- 13 Prince A, Brown K, Yvonne M. et al. Faculty and student perceptions of unauthorized collaborations: student or system failure?. 2021 . Accessed September 11, 2024 at: https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1299&context=gw_research_showcase
- 14 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Plagiarism and common knowledge. Accessed August 4, 2024 at: https://ori.hhs.gov/plagiarism-and-common-knowledge
- 15 Harvard University. Harvard guide to using sources: a publication of the Harvard College Writing Program. The exception: common knowledge. Accessed September 25, 2024 at: https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/exception-common-knowledge
- 16 Kadayam Guruswami G, Mumtaz S, Gopakumar A, Khan E, Abdullah F, Parahoo SK. Academic integrity perceptions among health-professions' students: a cross-sectional study in the Middle East. J Acad Ethics 2023; 21 (02) 231-249
- 17 Rodrigues F, Gupta P, Khan AP, Chatterjee T, Sandhu NK, Gupta L. The cultural context of plagiarism and research misconduct in the Asian region. J Korean Med Sci 2023; 38 (12) e88
- 18 Ahmed S, Anirvan P. The true meaning of plagiarism. Indian J Rheumatol 2020; 15 (03) 155-158
- 19 Katz DS, Gardner JB, Hoffmann JC. et al. Ethical issues in radiology journalism, peer review, and research. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207 (04) 820-825
- 20 Ahmed K. Academic integrity: challenges and strategies for Asia and the Middle East. Account Res 2020; 27 (05) 256-270
- 21 Adeleye OA, Adebamowo CA. Factors associated with research wrongdoing in Nigeria. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2012; 7 (05) 15-24
- 22 Lewis MJ, Shacklock A, Connors CM, Sampford C. Integrity reform in developing countries: an assessment of Georgia's integrity system. Public Integr 2013; 15 (03) 243-264
- 23 Afzali M, Ҫolak G, Fu M. Economic uncertainty and corruption: evidence from public and private firms. J Financ Stab 2021; 57: 100936
- 24 Tanner C, Linder S, Sohn M. Does moral commitment predict resistance to corruption? experimental evidence from a bribery game. PLoS One 2022; 17 (01) e0262201
- 25 Hesselmann F, Graf V, Schmidt M, Reinhart M. The visibility of scientific misconduct: a review of the literature on retracted journal articles. Curr Sociol 2017; 65 (06) 814-845
- 26 Abdullah S, Khan ZW, Fatima S, Ali N, Tauqeer A, Razzaq ZA. The frequency of questionable research practices in the domain of medical writing among the various health professionals of Pakistan: an analytical cross-sectional study. Int J Health Sci 2023; 7 (S1): 221-227
- 27 Bain LE, Tchuisseu-Kwangoua LA, Adeagbo O. et al. Fostering research integrity in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges, opportunities, and recommendations. Pan Afr Med J 2022; 43: 182
- 28 Maghdid RS, Kareem SM, Salih Hama Y, Waris M, Naveed RT. Moderating role of political stability and economic policy uncertainty between country governance practice and stock market performance. A comparative analysis of Pakistan and Kurdistan Region of Iraq. PLoS One 2024; 19 (04) e0301698
- 29 Hudson S, González-Gómez HV, Claasen C. Societal inequality, corruption and relation-based inequality in organizations. J Bus Ethics 2022; 181 (03) 789-809
- 30 iThentictae. 6 consequences of plagiarism. Accessed August 4, 2024 at: https://www.ithenticate.com/resources/6-consequences-of-plagiarism#:~:text=Legal%20Repercussions&text=An%20author%20has%20the%20right,particularly%20susceptible%20to%20plagiarism%20issues
- 31 Bretag T. Challenges in addressing plagiarism in education. PLoS Med 2013; 10 (12) e1001574
- 32 The Associated Press. Boston U. panel finds plagiarism by Dr. King. The New York Times; 1991. . Accessed September 25, 2024 at: https://www.nytimes.com/1991/10/11/us/boston-u-panel-finds-plagiarism-by-dr-king.html
- 33 Davey M, Convery S, Kemp E. New plagiarism claims against sport concussion guru Paul McCrory. The Guardian. 2022 . Accessed September 25, 2024 at: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/sep/23/new-plagiarism-claims-against-sport-concussion-guru-paul-mccrory
- 34 Fusch P, Ness L, Booker JM, Fusch G. The ethical implications of plagiarism and ghostwriting in an open society. J Soc Change 2017; 9: 55-63
- 35 Rendleman DA. Copy that!”: what is plagiarism in the practice of law?. American Bar Association. Ethics in View. 2020 . Accessed September 25, 2024 at: https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/publications/youraba/2020/youraba-march-2020/_copy-that-_–what-is-plagiarism-in-the-practice-of-law-/
- 36 Das N, Panjabi M. Plagiarism: why is it such a big issue for medical writers?. Perspect Clin Res 2011; 2 (02) 67-71
- 37 Singhal S, Kalra BS. Publication ethics: role and responsibility of authors. Indian J Gastroenterol 2021; 40 (01) 65-71
- 38 Ashkenazi I, Olsha O. Inappropriate journal authorship, disputes, plagiarism, and mistrust in the institution: different beasts ... same problem. Rambam Maimonides Med J 2023; 14 (04) e0027
- 39 Arjuman A, Chakraborty SN. Plagiarism and authorship credit. Indian J Public Health 2024; 68 (02) 318-323
- 40 Leonard S. Plagiarism in the digital age. Watermark 2011; 5: 258-274
- 41 Ercegovac Z, Richardson JV. Academic dishonesty, plagiarism included, in the digital age: a literature review. Coll Res Libr 2004; 65 (04) 301-318
- 42 Sexton AY. Exploring and Preventing Accidental Plagiarism in a Digital Age. Georgia International Conference on Information Literacy. 83. 2015. Accessed September 25, 2024 at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/gaintlit/2015/2015/83
- 43 Evering LC, Moorman G. Rethinking plagiarism in the digital age. J Adolesc Adult Literacy 2012; 56 (01) 35-44
- 44 Zimba O, Gasparyan AY. Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers. Reumatologia 2021; 59 (03) 132-137
- 45 Bertram Gallant T, Picciotto M, Bozinovic G, Tour E. Plagiarism or not? investigation of Turnitin®-detected similarity hits in biology laboratory reports. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 2019; 47 (04) 370-379
- 46 Driessen K. Best Paraphrasing Tool | Free & Premium Tools Compared. Scribbr; 2024 . Accessed September 25, 2024 at: https://www.scribbr.com/language-rules/best-paraphrasing-tool/
- 47 Gupta L, Tariq J, Yessirkepov M. et al. Plagiarism in non-anglophone countries: a cross-sectional survey of researchers and journal editors. J Korean Med Sci 2021; 36 (39) e247
- 48 Armond ACV, Gordijn B, Lewis J. et al. A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22 (01) 50
- 49 Mousavi T, Abdollahi M. A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences. Daru 2020; 28 (01) 359-369
- 50 Kumar PM, Priya NS, Musalaiah S, Nagasree M. Knowing and avoiding plagiarism during scientific writing. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2014; 4 (Suppl. 03) S193-S198
- 51 Collins S, Gemayel R, Chenette EJ. Avoiding common pitfalls of manuscript and figure preparation. FEBS J 2017; 284 (09) 1262-1266
- 52 Office of Undergraduate Education, Harvard College. Harvard guide to using sources. How to avoid plagiarism. A publication of the Harvard College Writing Program. Accessed August 4, 2024 at: https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/how-avoid-plagiarism
- 53 Dhammi IK, Ul Haq R. What is plagiarism and how to avoid it?. Indian J Orthop 2016; 50 (06) 581-583
- 54 Wager E, Kleinert S. Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the committee on publication ethics (cope). Acta Inform Med 2012; 20 (03) 136-140
- 55 Sharma H, Verma S. Insight into modern-day plagiarism: the science of pseudo research. Tzu Chi Med J 2019; 32 (03) 240-244
- 56 Brown SJ, Bakker CJ, Theis-Mahon NR. Retracted publications in pharmacy systematic reviews. J Med Libr Assoc 2022; 110 (01) 47-55
- 57 Rai R, Sabharwal S. Retracted publications in orthopaedics: prevalence, characteristics, and trends. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (09) e44
- 58 Council of Science Editors. Authorship and Authorship Responsibilities. Council of Science Editors. Accessed September 25, 2024 at: https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/2-2-authorship-and-authorship-responsibilities
- 59 Committee on Publication. Plagiarism in a published article. 2019 . Accessed September 25, 2024 at: https://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts/plagiarism-published-article