Analysis of Informatics Topics in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Program Requirements

Abstract

Background There is growing recognition of the need to incorporate informatics education in U.S. residencies. Medical residency training programs are critical in shaping system change and can play a pivotal role by incorporating clinical informatics (CI) based learning into their training requirements.

Objectives We searched the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Residency Program Requirements effective July 1, 2023, to assess the inclusion of CI topics for all medical residency specialties to assess the relative levels of CI knowledge expected by graduates.

Methods We performed independent full-text search queries of 23 informatics-related keywords (e.g., electronic health record, innovation, database) in the ACGME Residency Program Requirements of 24 medical specialties.

Results All specialties' requirements contained at least five different keywords, with the total count ranging from 25 to 42 (mean: 32.00; standard deviation: 5.09). Pathology contained the highest counts with 42, followed by internal medicine and family medicine with 41 each. Pathology included the most distinct keywords (11). The most common keywords were “leadership” (62%) and “electronic health record” (10%). There were no specific mentions of several keywords—including “analytics,” “artificial intelligence,” and “machine learning”—within any program requirements. Although the ACGME Residency Program Requirements state that residents must demonstrate competence in using information technology to optimize learning, the extent is not fully specified; only 10 programs mention the keyword “information technology” within their specialty guidelines.

Conclusion The integration of CI education varies across specialties and may be even more variable across programs. Our study highlights potential opportunities for further standardization and integration of CI into resident curriculum requirements in order to better prepare future physician workforces for a changing medical landscape. We encourage educators, residency review committees, and national specialty organizations to consider further exploring the incorporation of CI content into residency training program requirements.

Keywords

education - Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education - professional training - clinical informatics - workforce

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This study did not involve research with human subjects or animals.

Publication History

Received: 09 April 2024

Accepted: 19 September 2024

Article published online:
25 December 2024

• References

• 1 Gardner RM, Overhage JM, Steen EB. et al; AMIA Board of Directors. Core content for the subspecialty of clinical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (02) 153-157
• 2 Mai MV, Luo BT, Orenstein EW, Luberti AA. A model for clinical informatics education for residents: addressing an unmet need. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (02) 261-267
• 3 Masters K. Artificial intelligence in medical education. Med Teach 2019; 41 (09) 976-980
• 4 Joint Science Academies. G-Science Academies Statement 2020: Digital Health and the Learning Health System—Executive Summary. 2020. Accessed August 6, 2024 at: https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/joint-science-academies-statements-on-global-issues#sl-three-columns-fdcca5c7-9e72-4381-9f8e-70fa4c07d389
• 5 Abernethy A, Adams L, Barrett M. et al. The promise of digital health: then, now, and the future. NAM Perspect 2022; 2022: 10.31478/202206e
• 6 Johnson KB, Neuss MJ, Detmer DE. Electronic health records and clinician burnout: a story of three eras. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (05) 967-973
• 7 Sutton RT, Pincock D, Baumgart DC, Sadowski DC, Fedorak RN, Kroeker KI. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3 (01) 17
• 8 You JG, Samal L, Leung TI. et al. A call to support informatics curricula in U.S.-based residency education. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14 (05) 992-995
• 9 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Anatomic Pathology and Clinical Pathology. 2023. Accessed September 27, 2024 at: https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/300_pathology_2023.pdf
• 10 ACGME. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Common Program Requirements. Common Program Requirements. 2024. Accessed March 2, 2024 at: https://www.acgme.org/programs-and-institutions/programs/common-program-requirements/
• 11 Shaver J. The state of telehealth before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Prim Care 2022; 49 (04) 517-530
• 12 American Board of Preventive Medicine. Clinical Informatics Content Outline. Accessed June 26, 2024 at: https://www.theabpm.org/become-certified/exam-content/clinical-informatics-content-outline/
• 13 Friedman BA. Informatics as a separate section within a department of pathology. Am J Clin Pathol 1990; 94 (4, suppl 1): S2-S6
• 14 Park S, Parwani AV, Aller RD. et al. The history of pathology informatics: a global perspective. J Pathol Inform 2013; 4: 7
• 15 Silverman HD, Steen EB, Carpenito JN, Ondrula CJ, Williamson JJ, Fridsma DB. Domains, tasks, and knowledge for clinical informatics subspecialty practice: results of a practice analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (07) 586-593