Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Libyan International Medical University Journal 2024; 09(02): 068-073
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1793834
Original Article

A Retrospective Review of Ambulatory Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in a Suburban Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria

Bamidele A. Famurewa
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
2   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
,
Taoheed A. Jimoh
2   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
,
Ethelbert I. Ugwu
2   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
,
Fadekemi O. Oginni
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
2   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints


Abstract

Background Ambulatory surgical procedures are integral aspects of oral and maxillofacial surgical (OMS) practice.

Objective The aim of this study is to report the scope of ambulatory OMS procedures in a Nigerian suburban teaching hospital.

Method A retrospective review of ambulatory OMS procedures performed at Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria, between March 2021 and February 2022 was conducted. Sociodemographic data, diagnoses, procedures, type of anesthesia, and immediate postoperative complications were retrieved from patients' records. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.

Results Two hundred and fifty-two ambulatory OMS procedures were performed during the 12-month study period. This accounted for 80.3% (252/314) of elective surgeries. The patients' mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 32.2 (10.4) years, while a slight male preponderance (51.6%) was recorded. Third molar surgery was the commonest (48.0%) procedure undertaken in ambulatory setting. Most (90.9%) of them were performed under local anesthesia. Satisfactory postoperative pain control was achieved with the use of oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics in most patients (81.7%). However, owing to a failed ambulatory session, there was an eventual admission rate of 0.4% (1/252).

Conclusion Ambulatory surgical procedures constitute the majority of the OMS elective cases, with third molar surgery being the commonest procedure. Judicious prescription and administration of oral analgesics were effective in managing postoperative pain in our day case OMS patients. We recommend a prospective study to determine an intermediate/long-term outcome of care in ambulatory settings.

Keywords

day case surgery - local anesthesia - oral and maxillofacial day surgery - outpatient surgery

Ethical Approval

The study was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Public Health, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, with protocol number IPH/OAU/12/1924.


Authors' Contributions

B.A.F. was responsible for conceptualization, study design, project supervision, and writing of the original draft. T.A.J. was involved in data collection, data analysis, and review of the original draft. E.I.U. was involved in data collection and review of the original draft. F.O.O. was involved with conceptualization, and review and editing of the manuscript.




Publication History

Received: 03 July 2024

Accepted: 15 October 2024

Article published online:
26 November 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Nicoll JH. The surgery of infancy. BMJ 1909; 2: 753-754
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Waters RM. The down-town anesthesia clinic. Amer J Surg Qtrly Suppl Anesth Analg 1919; 33 (07) 71-73
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Hedley-Whyte J, Milamed DR. The evolution of sites of surgery. Ulster Med J 2006; 75 (01) 46-53
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Abdulkareem IH. Day case surgery in Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2011; 14 (04) 383-389
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Coyle TT, Helfrick JF, Gonzalez ML, Andresen RV, Perrott DH. Office-based ambulatory anesthesia: factors that influence patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction with deep sedation/general anesthesia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63 (02) 163-172
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Dann JJ. Outpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery: transition to a Surgicenter setting and outcome of the first 200 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56 (05) 572-577
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Arole G. Day-case oral and maxillofacial surgery in a Nigerian district general hospital: scope and limitations. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998; 80 (02) 108-110
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Çankaya AB, Akçay Ç, Kahraman N, Köseoğlu BG. Oral surgical procedures under local anaesthesia in day surgery. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18 (01) 179-183
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Bailey CR, Ahuja M, Bartholomew K. et al. Guidelines for day-case surgery 2019: guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the British Association of Day Surgery. Anaesthesia 2019; 74 (06) 778-792
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Goodson ML, Musa A, Fletcher IR. et al. An investigation into patient morbidity following oral day case surgery. Ambul Surg 2009; 15 (04) 82-86
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Christiansen CL, Ahlburg P, Jensen RH, Sindet-Pedersen S, Heslop J. Oral and maxillofacial day case surgery in general anesthesia with nasoendotracheal intubation. Ambul Surg 1993; 1 (02) 97-100
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Omeje KU, Osunde OD, Fomete B, Agbara R, Owobu T, Suleiman AR. Experience with the use of local anesthesia in maxillofacial surgery. Arch Int Surg 2018; 8: 21-26
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Jokić D, Macan D, Perić B. et al. Ambulatory oral surgery: 1-year experience with 11680 patients from Zagreb district, Croatia. Croat Med J 2013; 54 (01) 49-54
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Legbo JN, Opara WE. Day-care plastic surgery in Nigeria: coping with limited resources. Ann Afr Med 2005; 1: 14-18
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Olasoji HO, Odusanya SA. Comparative study of third molar impaction in rural and urban areas of South-Western Nigeria. Odontostomatol Trop 2000; 23 (90) 25-28
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Oginni FO, Ogboko VI, Odusanya SA. Changing pattern of maxillofacial fractures in a sub-urban Nigerian teaching hospital. Niger Postgrad Med J 2009; 16 (01) 54-58
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Ibikunle AA, Taiwo AO, Braimah RO, Gbotolorun OM. Changing pattern in the treatment of mandibular fractures in North-Western Nigeria. Afr J Trauma 2016; 5: 36-42
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Deutsch N, Wu CL. Patient outcomes following ambulatory anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2003; 21 (02) 403-415
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Sowande OA, Takure AO, Salako AA. et al. Day case urology in a dedicated day case surgery in a Nigerian teaching hospital. J Ambul Surg 2009; 15 (02) 24-26
    Search in Google Scholar