Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2025; 35(S 01): S18-S29
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1793914
Research and Publications: Evolution and Principles
Review Article

Insights into Radiology Publications

Paul Sathiadoss
1   Department of Medical Imaging, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
,
Rajesh Bhayana
2   Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
,
Zara A. Shaikh
3   Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
,
Satheesh Krishna 
2   Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The evolution of modern medicine has been significantly driven by medical and health care research, underscoring the importance of disseminating findings to advance health care. Medical literature, encompassing various publication types such as case reports, review articles, and original research, plays a crucial role in this process by facilitating the communication and discussion of new discoveries. This review article provides a comprehensive guide to understanding and navigating radiologic publications. It examines the various types of radiologic research articles, including case reports and series, pictorial reviews, original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, each of which serve distinct purposes in contributing to the field of radiology. The study adopts the “six honest men” approach—addressing why, who, what, when, where, and how—to elucidate the essential elements of successful radiology research and publication. Key topics include the motivations for publishing, the types of articles suited for different research questions, and strategic considerations for selecting appropriate journals. Additionally, the review highlights the importance of understanding publication timing, journal selection criteria, and the overall publication process, including manuscript preparation and peer review. By offering these insights, the review aims to equip early-career researchers with the knowledge and skills necessary to effectively contribute to radiology literature and advance their academic and professional careers.

Keywords

case report - case series - manuscript - meta-analysis - original article - pictorial review - publications - radiology - review article - systematic review


Publication History

Article published online:
09 January 2025

© 2025. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Institute of Medicine (US); Board on Health Sciences Policy; Clinical Research Roundtable. Tunis S, Korn A, Ommaya A. eds. The Role of Purchasers and Payers in the Clinical Research Enterprise: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Peh WC, Ng KH. Writing a pictorial essay. Singapore Med J 2010; 51 (03) 186-188 , quiz 189
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Peh WC, Ng KH. Why write?. Singapore Med J 2008; 49 (06) 443-444
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ahn E, Kang H. Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J Anesthesiol 2018; 71 (02) 103-112
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 McNair P, Lewis G. Levels of evidence in medicine. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012; 7 (05) 474-481
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Peh WC, Ng KH. Basic structure and types of scientific papers. Singapore Med J 2008; 49 (07) 522-525
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Riccaboni M, Verginer L. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientific research in the life sciences. PLoS One 2022; 17 (02) e0263001
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Krishna S, Sodhi KS, Saxena AK, Singhi P, Khandelwal N. Hyperdense basal ganglia in nonketotic hyperglycemia. J Emerg Med 2015; 49 (02) e57-e58
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Vyas S, Krishna S, Kumar A, Khandelwal N. “Floating lens sign” in traumatic lens dislocations. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2015; 22 (01) 129-130
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Siddiqui MA, Ahmad M, Prakash Sathiadoss P, Wahab S, Jamal F, Khan MS. Giant-cell tumor of the patella in a skeletally immature girl. Pol Orthop Traumatol 2014; 79: 88-91
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Vegar-Zubović S, Izetbegović S, Zukić F. et al. A case series of chest imaging manifestation of COVID-19. Radiography (Lond) 2020; 26 (04) e319-e321
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kihira S, Delman BN, Belani P. et al. Imaging features of acute encephalopathy in patients with COVID-19: a case series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020; 41 (10) 1804-1808
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Krishna S, Schieda N, Pedrosa I. et al. Update on MRI of cystic renal masses including Bosniak version 2019. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 54 (02) 341-356
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Odedra D, Sabongui S, Khalili K, Schieda N, Pei Y, Krishna S. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: role of imaging in diagnosis and management. Radiographics 2023; 43 (01) e220126
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Gopee-Ramanan P, Chin SS, Lim C, Shanbhogue KP, Schieda N, Krishna S. Renal neoplasms in young adults. Radiographics 2022; 42 (02) 433-450
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Krishna S, Shanbhogue K, Schieda N. et al. Role of MRI in staging of penile cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 51 (06) 1612-1629
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Harper K, Sathiadoss P, Saifuddin A, Sheikh A. A review of imaging of surface sarcomas of bone. Skeletal Radiol 2021; 50 (01) 9-28
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Haroon M, Sathiadoss P, Hibbert RM, Jeyaraj SK, Lim C, Schieda N. Imaging considerations for thermal and radiotherapy ablation of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46 (11) 5386-5407
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Schieda N, Krishna S, Pedrosa I, Kaffenberger SD, Davenport MS, Silverman SG. Active surveillance of renal masses: the role of radiology. Radiology 2022; 302 (01) 11-24
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Udare A, Abreu-Gomez J, Krishna S, McInnes M, Siegelman E, Schieda N. Imaging manifestations of acute and chronic renal infection that mimics malignancy: how to make the diagnosis using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Can Assoc Radiol J 2019; 70 (04) 424-433
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Narayanasamy S, Krishna S, Sathiadoss P, Althobaity W, Koujok K, Sheikh AM. Radiographic review of avulsion fractures RadioGraphics fundamentals | Online presentation. Radiographics 2018; 38 (05) 1496-1497
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Krishna S, Bhambra N, Bleakney R, Bhayana R. Evaluation of reliability, repeatability, robustness, and confidence of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on a radiology board-style examination. Radiology 2024; 311 (02) e232715
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Krishna S, Kalra N, Singh P. et al. Small-bowel tuberculosis: a comparative study of MR enterography and small-bowel follow-through. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207 (03) 571-577
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Krishna S, Sadoughi N, McInnes MDF, Chatelain R, MacDonald DB, Schieda N. Attenuation and degree of enhancement with conventional 120-kVp polychromatic CT and 70-keV monochromatic rapid kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT in cystic and solid renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211 (04) 789-796
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Mammen S, Krishna S, Quon M. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of qualitative and quantitative computed tomography analysis for diagnosis of pathological grade and stage in upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2018; 42 (02) 204-210
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Sadoughi N, Krishna S, Macdonald DB. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of attenuation difference and iodine concentration thresholds at rapid-kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT for detection of enhancement in renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213 (03) 619-625
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Siddaiah M, Krishna S, McInnes MDF. et al. Is ultrasound useful for further evaluation of homogeneously hyperattenuating renal lesions detected on CT?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 209 (03) 604-610
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Bhayana R, Nanda B, Dehkharghanian T. et al. Large language models for automated synoptic reports and resectability categorization in pancreatic cancer. Radiology 2024; 311 (03) e233117
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Bhayana R, Elias G, Datta D, Bhambra N, Deng Y, Krishna S. Use of GPT-4 with single-shot learning to identify incidental findings in radiology reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222 (03) e2330651
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Tu W, Verma R, Krishna S, McInnes MDF, Flood TA, Schieda N. Can adrenal adenomas be differentiated from adrenal metastases at single-phase contrast-enhanced CT?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211 (05) 1044-1050
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Sathiadoss P, Schieda N, Haroon M. et al. Utility of quantitative T2-mapping compared to conventional and advanced diffusion weighted imaging techniques for multiparametric prostate MRI in men with hip prosthesis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 55 (01) 265-274
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Moloney BM, Mc Carthy CE, Bhayana R, Krishna S. Sigmoid volvulus-Can CT features predict outcomes and recurrence?. Eur Radiol 2024; (e-pub ahead of print)
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Al-Hayali A, Komeili A, Azad A, Sathiadoss P, Schieda N, Ukwatta E. Machine learning based prediction of image quality in prostate MRI using rapid localizer images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2024; 11 (02) 026001
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Sathiadoss P, Haroon M, Osman H, Ahmad F, Papadatos P, Schieda N. Comparison of 5 rectal preparation strategies for prostate MRI and impact on image quality. Can Assoc Radiol J 2022; 73 (02) 346-354
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Bhayana R, Fawzy A, Deng Y, Bleakney RR, Krishna S. Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models in radiology: another leap forward in board examination performance. Radiology 2024; 313 (01) e241489
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Krishna S, Schieda N, Kulkarni GS, Shanbhogue K, Baroni RH, Woo S. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in local Staging (T category) of penile cancer and the value of artificial erection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022; 219 (01) 28-36
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Gandhi N, Krishna S, Booth CM. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for tumour staging of bladder cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 2018; 122 (05) 744-753
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar