Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1793915
Original Article

Impact of Paper Consumption in Radiology Departments on Carbon Footprint and Climate Change: A Retrospective Analysis and Future Projections

Sushmitha Jagadeesha
1   Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
,
Shikha Agarwal
1   Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
,
Mohsin Hussein 
1   Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
,
A Mark Davies
1   Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
,
Durosinmi Adebowale
2   Department of Information and Technology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
,
Rajesh Botchu
1   Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Climate change and global warming have major contributions from greenhouse gas emissions. Despite the introduction of digitalized systems, many health care systems still rely heavily on paper. The purpose of this study is to investigate paper usage in the radiology department of a single hospital institution over the last 3 years to forecast paper usage up to 2050.

Methodology This retrospective study was performed in the radiology department of our tertiary orthopaedic hospital. The study included forms used for diagnostic and interventional procedures in various departmental modalities. Diagnostic procedures require one to three forms and interventional procedures require three forms each. Based on the established ratio that 1.2 trees are cut for every 10,000 sheets of papers used, the study calculated the number of trees cut annually over the past 3 years and projected paper usage and tree loss until 2050.

Results Paper usage was distributed between diagnostic and interventional procedures, with 67% used in diagnostics and 33% in interventions. The corresponding number of trees cut during this period amounted to 53.729 trees, with 47.4 trees for diagnostic procedures and 6.4 trees for interventional procedures. A total of 57.8 trees for diagnostic procedures and 11.7 trees for interventional procedures were forecasted to be cut annually from 2024 to 2050, cumulatively being 1,227 trees by the year 2050.

Conclusion Our individual department had a significant contribution from paper usage in the carbon footprint of the department. Adoption of digitalized appointment, prescribing, and patient records is important in reducing this and achieving the NHS net zero targets.

Keywords

green - 2050 - carbon footprint - radiology - climate change


Publication History

Article published online:
11 December 2024

© 2024. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 AORN position statement on environmental responsibility. AORN J 2020; 111 (06) 667-674
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Freifeld AG, Todd AI, Khan AS. The climate crisis and healthcare: what do infection prevention and stewardship professionals need to know?. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 2023; 3 (01) e136
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Nichols A, Manzi S. Physical space and its impact on waste management in the neonatal care setting. J Infect Prev 2014; 15 (04) 134-138
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Shelton C, Lentzos S. Sustainability is a core outcome: filling research gaps in sustainable peri-operative care. Anaesthesia 2024; 79 (03) 226-231
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Fleming AL, Wang G, McRoberts RE. Comparison of methods toward multi-scale forest carbon mapping and spatial uncertainty analysis: combining national forest inventory plot data and Landsat TM images. Eur J For Res 2014; 134 (01) 125-137
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Krah K. Maize price variability, land use change, and forest loss: evidence from Ghana. Land Use Policy 2023; 125: 106472
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Campanella P, Lovato E, Marone C. et al. The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Public Health 2016; 26 (01) 60-64
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Warren LR, Clarke J, Arora S, Darzi A. Improving data sharing between acute hospitals in England: an overview of health record system distribution and retrospective observational analysis of inter-hospital transitions of care. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (12) e031637
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Best J. NHS still reliant on paper patient notes and drug charts despite electronic upgrades, The BMJ finds. BMJ 2023; 382: 2050
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Roletto A, Zanardo M, Bonfitto GR, Catania D, Sardanelli F, Zanoni S. The environmental impact of energy consumption and carbon emissions in radiology departments: a systematic review. Eur Radiol Exp 2024; 8 (01) 35
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Kataoka H, Iwase T, Ogawa H. et al. Can communication skills training improve empathy? A six-year longitudinal study of medical students in Japan. Med Teach 2019; 41 (02) 195-200
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Nowak DJ, Greenfield EJ, Hoehn RE, Lapoint E. Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environ Pollut 2013; 178: 229-236
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Tennison I, Roschnik S, Ashby B. et al. Health care's response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England. Lancet Planet Health 2021; 5 (02) e84-e92
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Lutz JA, Furniss TJ, Johnson DJ. et al. Global importance of large-diameter trees. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 2018; 27 (07) 849-864
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar