RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1793916
Peer Review of an Article: Tips, Tricks, and Troubleshooting
Funding None.
Abstract
Scientific publications are rapidly increasing in number, placing growing pressure on academics to publish. This study highlights the important tips and tricks for the authors in the context of reviewers' feedback and how to manage the article till the final stage of publication.
Authors' Contributions
R.R. was responsible for the design and development of the study, and writing the manuscript. B.S. conceptualized the study and did the final manuscript editing.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
09. Januar 2025
© 2025. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Kronick DA. Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. JAMA 1990; 263 (10) 1321-1322
- 2 Henriquez T. Open peer review, pros and cons from the perspective of an early career researcher. MBio 2023; 14 (05) e0194823
- 3 Remuzzi G. The ethics of peer review process. Updates Surg 2023; 75 (06) 1391-1392
- 4 Kliewer MA. Writing it up: a step-by-step guide to publication for beginning investigators. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185 (03) 591-596
- 5 Siegelman SS. Advice to authors. Radiology 1988; 166 (1, Pt 1): 278-280