Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1795083
Alginate Impression Material Reinforcement Using Polymethyl Methacrylate as Organic Filler
Authors
Abstract
Objectives
Dental alginate is one of the impression materials used in dentistry to reproduce intra- and extraoral structures. Alginate is a quite affordable and easy-to-use material, but because of its lower tear strength, it still has limitations in terms of accuracy. One way to increase the tear strength of alginate is by adding fillers. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is an example of an organic filler that can be utilized as an alternative reinforcement that could effectively increase dimensional stability. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the alginate's tear strength following the addition of PMMA as organic fillers.
Materials and Methods
This experimental research consisted of four group samples. Sample A served as controls, while sample B included treated samples with varying PMMA additions of 3wt% (B1), 5wt% (B2), and 7wt% (B3). Each group had five samples. The tear strength test was conducted according to ISO Standard 21563:2021 using a Universal Testing Machine, which was followed by characterization using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) spectroscopy.
Statistical Analysis
The tear strength results were then evaluated by One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) following Tukey's test (p < 0.05).
Results
The tear strength of the control sample (A) was 0.540 N/mm. Meanwhile, the treated samples had tear strengths of 0.612 N/mm (B1), 0.663 N/mm (B2), and 0.596 N/mm (B3). There was a difference between the control and the treated samples that used PMMA fillers (p < 0.05). These results are supported by SEM and FTIR results related to physical closure or blocking of the alginate porous structure and the slight changes in its functional group.
Conclusion
The addition of PMMA fillers to dental alginate provides reinforcement as the tear strength increases. This could impact the accuracy of the impression especially when the material is quickly removed from the oral structures. Additional investigation may assess the biocompatibility attributes further.
Publication History
Article published online:
20 January 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Singh S, Mishra SK, Kumar P. An in-vitro evaluation of impact of water hardness on tear strength of alginate impression material. Rama Univ J Dent Sci 2021; 7 (04) 9-13
- 2 Adamiak K, Sionkowska A. State of innovation in alginate-based materials. Mar Drugs 2023; 21 (06) 1-26
- 3 Chandran SK, Jaini JL, Babu AS, Mathew A, Keepanasseril A. Digital versus conventional impressions in dentistry: a systematic review. J Clin Diagn Res 2019; 13 (04) ZE01-ZE06
- 4 Zdiri K, Cayla A, Elamri A, Erard A, Salaun F. Alginate-based bio-composites and their potential applications. J Funct Biomater 2022; 13 (03) 1-31
- 5 Helmiyati AM. Characterization and properties of sodium alginate from brown algae used as an ecofriendly superabsorbent. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2017; 188: 012019
- 6 Abdelraouf RM, Bayoumi RE, Hamdy TM. Effect of powder/water ratio variation on viscosity, tear strength and detail reproduction of dental alginate impression material (in vitro and clinical study). Polymers (Basel) 2021; 13 (17) 1-11
- 7 Fayaz A, Noori A. Evaluation of tear strength of two types of Iralgin and its comparison with similar alginate impression material. J Dent Sch 2016; 34 (01) 28-33
- 8 Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips's Science of Dental Materials. 12th ed.. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Inc.; 2013: 152-181
- 9 Kaidi S, Bentiss F, Jama C. et al. Isolation and structural characterization of alginates from the kelp species Laminaria ochroleuca and Saccorhiza polyschides from the Atlantic Coast of Morocco. Colloids Interfaces 2022; 6 (04) 51
- 10 Vaderhobli RM. Advances in dental materials. Dent Clin North Am 2011; 55 (03) 619-625 , x
- 11 Alhotan A, Yates J, Zidan S, Haider J, Silikas N. Flexural strength and hardness of filler-reinforced PMMA targeted for denture base application. Materials (Basel) 2021; 14 (10) 1-14
- 12 Ali U, Karim KJBA, Buang NA. A review of the properties and applications of poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Polym Rev 2015; 55 (04) 678-705
- 13 Takarini V, Asri LATW, Suratman R, Hadi BK. The potential use of Indonesian glutinous rice flour as nanoparticles organic filler for dental impression materials. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2020; 1007: 012003
- 14 Acosta AP, Labidi J, Schulz HR. et al. Thermochemical and mechanical properties of pine wood treated by in situ polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA). Forests 2020; 11 (07) 1-10
- 15 Zhang Y, Wang Y, Kong X, Zhao D. Mechanical properties of methyl methacrylate copolymers. Presented at: Asia-Pacific Energy Equipment Engineering Research Conference (AP3ER 2015); June 13–14, 2015; Zhuhai, China
- 16 Dong X, Sun T, Liu Y, Li C, Li Y. Structure and properties of polymer-impregnated wood prepared by in-situ polymerization of reactive monomers. BioResources 2015; 10 (04) 7854-7864
- 17 Singer L, Bourauel C. Mechanical and physical properties of an experimental chemically and green-nano improved dental alginate after proven antimicrobial potentials. Gels 2023; 9 (05) 1-12
- 18 International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 21563:2021: Dentistry—Hydrocolloid Impression Materials. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2021
- 19 Abdollahi H, Najafi V, Amiri F. Determination of monomer reactivity ratios and thermal properties of poly(GMA-co-MMA) copolymers. Polym Bull 2021; 78 (01) 493-511
- 20 Raszewski Z, Mikulewicz M, Brzakalski D, Pakula D, Przekop RE. Comparison of the bioactive and bacteriostatic performance of different alginate-based dental prosthetic impression materials with and without zirconium phosphate-based ion exchange resin containing silver: an in vitro study. Appl Sci 2023; 13 (21) 11639
- 21 Abdelraouf RM. Chemical analysis and microstructure examination of extended-pour alginate impression versus conventional one (characterization of dental extended-pour alginate). Int J Polym Mater 2018; 67 (10) 612-618
- 22 Vallés C, Papageorgiou DG, Lin F. et al. PMMA-grafted graphene nanoplatelets to reinforce the mechanical and thermal properties of PMMA composites. Carbon 2020; 157: 750-760
- 23 Salisu A, Sanagi MM, Karim KJA, Pourmand N, Ibrahim WAW. Adsorption of methylene blue on alginate-grafted-Poly (methyl methacrylate). J Teknol 2015; 76 (13) 19-25
- 24 Meincke DK, Ogliari AdeO, Ogliari FA. Influence of different fillers on the properties of an experimental vinyl polysiloxane. Braz Oral Res 2016; 30 (01) 1-10
- 25 Zafar MS. Prosthodontic applications of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA): an update. Polymers (Basel) 2020; 12 (10) 1-35
- 26 Arenas-Arrocena MC, Argueta-Figueroa L, García-Contreras R. et al. New trends for the processing of poly(methyl methacrylate) biomaterial for dental prosthodontics. In: Reddy BSR. eds. Acrylic Polymers in Healthcare. London: Intech Open; 2017: 43-74
- 27 Saskianti T, Purnamasari S, Pradopo S. et al. The effect of mixed polymethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite on viability of stem cell from human exfoliated deciduous teeth and osteoblast. Eur J Dent 2024; 18 (01) 314-320
