PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1795106
Research Article

Role of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Pediatric Tethered Cord Syndrome Surgeries and Technical Insights

Wael Abd Elrahman Ali Elmesallamy 
1   Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Alsharkia, Egypt
,
Alshaimaa Abdel Fattah Kamel 
2   Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Alsharkia, Egypt
,
Ahmad Fahmy
2   Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Alsharkia, Egypt
,
Mohamed Elbana
1   Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Alsharkia, Egypt
,
Mahmoud M. Taha
1   Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Alsharkia, Egypt
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objectives Spinal cord tethering lesions in pediatric patients may cause neurological deficits through direct or indirect neural impairments, and untethering surgeries must be targeted to prevent further neural impairments. This study aimed to evaluate the role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONPM) during spinal dysraphism untethering surgeries, with an emphasis on some technical insights.

Methods This retrospective study was conducted on 67 pediatric patients who suffered spinal dysraphismic lesions and underwent spinal cord untethering during the period from January 2017 to January 2023, with a follow-up period of at least 1 year. All surgeries involved the use of IONPM under total intravenous anesthesia. Spinal cord and root untethering were tried by neurolysis, sectioning of the filum terminale, and maximal lesion resection according to the offending pathology. In some cases, intraoperative ultrasound was used for tissue differentiation.

Results There was no significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative clinical conditions of the patients, while after 1 year of follow-up, there were significant clinical improvements regarding motor power, sensation, urinary control, and stool incontinence. Permanent warning changes in IONPM parameters occurred in 10 patients. Motor evoked potential monitoring recorded 100% specificity (true-negative probability rate) and accuracy of 98.51% (overall probability) in relation to the clinical condition of the patients, while electromyographic and bulbocavernosus reflex monitoring recorded 100% sensitivity (true-positive probability rate) with an accuracy of 95.52 and 96%, respectively.

Conclusion Technically, IONPM during pediatric spinal cord and untethering of roots provides safety when dealing with such delicate neural tissues with the aid of intraoperative ultrasound whenever needed, in addition to surgical assurance of maximal neural element untethering.

Keywords

intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring - intraoperative ultrasound - pediatric tethered cord syndrome - spinal dysraphism


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. Februar 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Schoenmakers MA, Gooskens RH, Gulmans VA. et al. Long-term outcome of neurosurgical untethering on neurosegmental motor and ambulation levels. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003; 45 (08) 551-555
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 McLone DG, La Marca F. The tethered spinal cord: diagnosis, significance, and management. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997; 4 (03) 192-208
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Al-Holou WN, Muraszko KM, Garton HJ, Buchman SR, Maher CO. The outcome of tethered cord release in secondary and multiple repeat tethered cord syndrome. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2009; 4 (01) 28-36
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Elmesallamy W, AbdAlwanis A, Mohamed S. Tethered cord syndrome: surgical outcome of 43 cases and review of literatures. Egypt J Neurosurg. 2019; 34: 4
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Hoving EW, Haitsma E, Oude Ophuis CM, Journée HL. The value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in tethered cord surgery. Childs Nerv Syst 2011; 27 (09) 1445-1452
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Kim K. Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring for spinal dysraphism. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2021; 64 (02) 143-150
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Nair BR, Ramamani M, Singh G, Babu KS, Rajshekhar V. Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of intra-operative monitoring of motor evoked potentials in children <2 years of age undergoing tethered cord surgery: results in 100 children. Childs Nerv Syst 2021; 37 (07) 2289-2298
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Medical Research Council. Aids to the Investigation of the Peripheral Nervous System. London:: Her Majesty's Stationary Office; Medical Research Council; 1943
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Korean Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring, Korean Neurological Association, Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, Korean Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, Korean Association of EMG Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring: 2020 update. Ann Clin Neurophys 2021; 23 (01) 35-45
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Baig Mirza A, Vastani A, Syrris C. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for intradural extramedullary spinal tumours. Global Spine J 2021; 21: 21 925682221139822
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Rajappa D, Khan MM, Masapu D. et al. Multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgeries: the experience at a spine centre through years. Asian Spine J 2021; 15 (06) 728-738
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Niljianskul N, Prasertchai P. The effect of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring on neurological outcomes after spinal tumors operations: a single institution experience. Interdiscip Neurosurg Adv Techn Case Manag 2023; 3: 101703
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Drolet BA, Chamlin SL, Garzon MC. et al. Prospective study of spinal anomalies in children with infantile hemangiomas of the lumbosacral skin. J Pediatr 2010; 157 (05) 789-794
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Choi I, Hyun SJ, Kang JK, Rhim SC. Combined muscle motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intramedullary spinal cord tumour surgery. Yonsei Med J 2014; 55 (04) 1063-1071
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Harel R, Schleifer D, Appel S, Attia M, Cohen ZR, Knoller N. Spinal intradural extramedullary tumors: the value of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring on surgical outcome. Neurosurg Rev 2017; 40 (04) 613-619
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hadley MN, Shank CD, Rozzelle CJ, Walters BC. Guidelines for the use of electrophysiological monitoring for surgery of the human spinal column and spinal cord. Neurosurgery 2017; 81 (05) 713-732
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Weinzierl MR, Reinacher P, Gilsbach JM, Rohde V. Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra- and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations. Neurosurg Rev 2007; 30 (02) 109-116 , discussion 116
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ali Z, Bithal PK. Intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring. J Neuroanaesth Crit Care. 2015; 2: 179-192
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Hilibrand AS, Schwartz DM, Sethuraman V, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ. Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86 (06) 1248-1253
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Bose B, Sestokas AK, Schwartz DM. Neurophysiological detection of iatrogenic C-5 nerve deficit during anterior cervical spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6 (05) 381-385
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Lall RR, Lall RR, Hauptman JS. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: indications, efficacy, and role of the preoperative checklist. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 33 (05) E10
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Alvarado E, Leach J, Caré M, Mangano F, OHara S. Pediatric spinal ultrasound: neonatal and intraoperative applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2017; 38 (02) 126-142
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Elmesallamy WAEA. Perioperative ultrasound imaging versus magnetic resonance imaging in management of lumbosacral spinal dysraphisms. Egypt J Neurosurg 2019; 34: 39
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Mehta DV. Magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric spinal dysraphism with comparative usefulness of various magnetic resonance sequences. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11 (08) TC17-TC22
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar