Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1795107
Borescopes as a Training Tool for Neuroendoscopy
Abstract
Background Neuroendoscopy is increasingly utilized as a minimally invasive method. Due to its challenging learning process, there is a pressing need for cost-efficient training methods for residents and fellows in these surgeries. One such modality is using borescopes as substitutes for endoscopes, which could prove beneficial in resource-limited settings. However, existing literature on the use of borescopes in surgical practice for training remains scarce.
Methods A thorough literature review was conducted to assess the applicability of borescopes. The search encompassed original articles, review articles, and randomized control trials on PubMed and Cochrane library. Studies were analyzed to evaluate the operability and limitations of borescopes in medical settings, considering factors such as light source, water resistance, sterility, camera quality, rigidity, ease of operation, and cost. This review also draws on practical experience using borescopes in endoscopic training, supplemented by feedback from neuroendoscopic fellows and consultants who have participated in our biannual workshops since March 2022.
Results The literature search yielded 522 articles, which, after applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, resulted in 61 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Universal serial bus (USB) powered borescopes have been employed as substitutes for endoscopes in training models using practice models and cadavers, facilitating the study of neuroanatomy and aiding in airway visualization during laryngoscopy. Despite lower resolution and fidelity compared to traditional endoscopy towers, their versatility and enhanced functionality through attachments make them an affordable alternative for endoscopes, contributing to improved surgical proficiency.
Conclusion Borescopes have demonstrated potential as substitutes for endoscopes in training models, with positive feedback from trial participants suggesting broader applications in practice settings and possibly even clinics. This could ultimately enhance accessibility to endoscopic surgery, particularly in underserved regions.
Publication History
Article published online:
23 December 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Walker ML. History of ventriculostomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2001; 12 (01) 101-110 , viii
- 2 Yadav YR, Parihar V, Pande S, Namdev H, Agarwal M. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2012; 3 (02) 163-173
- 3 Sihag R, Bajaj J, Yadav YR. et al. Endoscope-controlled access to thalamic tumors using tubular brain retractor: an alternative approach to microscopic excision. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2022; 83 (02) 122-128
- 4 Shrivastava A, Bajaj J, Yadav YR. et al. Colloid cyst presenting as head injury. Indian J Neurosurg 2023; 12 (01) 76-78
- 5 Ratre S, Yadav YR, Swamy MN, Parihar V, Bajaj J. Endoscopic anterior cervical discectomy (disc preserving). Neurol India 2020; 68 (06) 1310-1312
- 6 Chandra PS, Subianto H, Bajaj J. et al. Endoscope-assisted (with robotic guidance and using a hybrid technique) interhemispheric transcallosal hemispherotomy: a comparative study with open hemispherotomy to evaluate efficacy, complications, and outcome. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2019; 23 (02) 187-197
- 7 Bridges M, Diamond DL. The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 1999; 177 (01) 28-32
- 8 Ross DG, Harris CA, Jones DJ. Six of the best, general 20. Br J Surg 2002; 89 (S1): 60
- 9 Breimer GE, Haji FA, Bodani V. et al. Simulation-based education for endoscopic third ventriculostomy: a comparison between virtual and physical training models. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2017; 13 (01) 89-95
- 10 Gaab MR. Neuroendoscopic training by low-priced universal serial bus endoscopes. World Neurosurg 2013; 79 (02) 255-257
- 11 Tsai CL, Heinrichs WL. Acquisition of eye-hand coordination skills for videoendoscopic surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994; 1 (4, Part 2): S37
- 12 Moon Y, Oh J, Hyun J. et al. Cost-effective smartphone-based articulable endoscope systems for developing countries: instrument validation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8 (09) e17057
- 13 Karippacheril JG, Umesh G, Nanda S. Assessment and confirmation of tracheal intubation when capnography fails: a novel use for an USB camera. J Clin Monit Comput 2013; 27 (05) 531-533
- 14 John A, Collins RA, Nagy L. Endoscopic neuroanatomy study using embalmed cadavers. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2023; 14 (02) 377-381
- 15 Huynh M. Smartphone-based device in exotic pet medicine. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 2019; 22 (03) 349-366
- 16 Hernandez-Zendejas G, Dobke MK, Guerrerosantos J. The universal serial bus endoscope: design and initial clinical experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004; 28 (03) 181-184
- 17 Findik M, Kayipmaz AE, Kavalci C. et al. Why USB-endoscope laryngoscopy is as effective as video laryngoscopy. Clin Invest Med 2020; 43 (02) E55-E59
- 18 Dias LA, Gebhard H, Mtui E, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. The use of an ultraportable universal serial bus endoscope for education and training in neuroendoscopy. World Neurosurg 2013; 79 (02) 337-340
- 19 Choque-Velasquez J, Miranda-Solis F, Colasanti R, Ccahuantico-Choquevilca LA, Hernesniemi J. Modified pure endoscopic approach to pineal region: proof of concept of efficient and inexpensive surgical model based on laboratory dissections. World Neurosurg 2018; 117: 195-198
- 20 Burge SD, Bunegin L, Weitzel EK, McMains KC. The validation of an endoscopic sinus surgery skills training model: a pilot study. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2012; 26 (05) 409-413
- 21 Bajaj J, Yadav YR, Pateriya A, Parihar V, Ratre S, Dubey A. Indigenous inexpensive practice models for skill development in neuroendoscopy. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2017; 8 (02) 170-173
- 22 Wright J, Joseph AM, Yassin K. et al. A novel do-it-yourself approach to simulating minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery. Cureus 2023; 15 (05) e38510
- 23 Aljamal Y, Cook DA, Sedlack RE, Kelley SR, Farley DR. An inexpensive, portable physical endoscopic simulator: description and initial evaluation. J Surg Res 2019; 243: 560-566
- 24 Stan C, Ujvary LP, Blebea CM. et al. Sheep's head as an anatomic model for basic training in endoscopic sinus surgery. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59 (10) 1792
- 25 Hanssen A, Hanssen DA, Hanssen RA, Plotnikov S, Haddad J, Daes JE. Implementation and validation of a novel and inexpensive training model for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. J Abdom Wall Surg 2022; 1: 10305
- 26 Eulálio JMR, Ferreira ML, Silva PC. et al. A technical note on low cost rat laparoscopy an initial experience. Acta Cir Bras 2018; 33 (09) 853-861
- 27 Basil G, Brusko GD, Brooks J, Wang MY. The value of a synthetic model-based training lab to increase proficiency with endoscopic approaches to the spine. Cureus 2020; 12 (03) e7330
- 28 Zymberg S, Vaz-Guimarães Filho F, Lyra M. Neuroendoscopic training: presentation of a new real simulator. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2010; 53 (01) 44-46
- 29 Howes BWRC, Repanos C. A low-cost, endoscopic, digital, still and video photography system for ENT clinics. J Laryngol Rhinol Otol 2010; 124 (05) 543-544
- 30 Coelho G, Kondageski C, Vaz-Guimarães Filho F. et al. Frameless image-guided neuroendoscopy training in real simulators. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2011; 54 (03) 115-118
- 31 Buis DR, Buis CR, Feller RE, Mandl ES, Peerdeman SM. A basic model for practice of intracranial microsurgery. Surg Neurol 2009; 71 (02) 254-256
- 32 Liu YF, Kim CH, Bailey TW. et al. A prospective assessment of nasopharyngolaryngoscope recording adaptor use in residency training. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 155 (04) 710-713
- 33 Yadav YR, Parihar V, Ratre S, Kher Y, Iqbal M. Microneurosurgical skills training. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2016; 77 (02) 146-154
- 34 Goodman AJ, Melson J, Aslanian HR. et al; ASGE Technology Committee. Endoscopic simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90 (01) 1-12
- 35 Hearst Magazines. Popular Mechanics Magazine. New York, NY:: Hearst Communications, Inc.;; 1945
- 36 Wikipedia. Borescope. 2024 . Accessed April 24, 2024 at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Borescope&oldid=1217234177#cite_note-1
- 37 Teslong. NTS500 Pro Triple-Lens Inspection Camera with 5-inch HD Screen. Accessed June 5, 2024 at: https://teslong.com/products/nts500-triple-lens-endoscope-with-5-inch-hd-screen
- 38 Amazon.in. MatLogix 5.5mm/7mm 2 Meters Waterproof Mini Endoscope USB Wire Snake Tube Inspection Borescope Camera Compatible with Android Smartphone PC (5.5mm). Accessed November 5, 2024 at: https://www.amazon.in/MatLogix-Waterproof-Inspection-Compatible-Smartphone/dp/B0B82V8RR1?th=1\uc0\u160{}
- 39 Wais M, Ooi E, Leung RM, Vescan AD, Lee J, Witterick IJ. The effect of low-fidelity endoscopic sinus surgery simulators on surgical skill. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012; 2 (01) 20-26
- 40 Sanri E, Akoglu EU, Karacabey S. et al. Diagnostic utilities of tracheal ultrasound and USB-endoscope for the confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: a cadaver study. Am J Emerg Med 2018; 36 (11) 1943-1946
- 41 Elshazly M, Medhat M, Marzouk S, Samir EM. Video laryngoscope versus USB borescope-aided endotracheal intubation in adults with anticipated difficult airway: a prospective randomized controlled study. Korean J Anesthesiol 2022; 75 (04) 331-337
- 42 Bajaj J, Yadav YR, Sinha M. et al. A model with feedback mechanism for learning hand-eye coordination: a pilot study. Neurol India 2024; 72 (02) 395-398
- 43 Garling RJ, Jin X, Yang J, Khasawneh AH, Harris CA. Low-cost endoscopic third ventriculostomy simulator with mimetic endoscope. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2018; 22 (02) 137-146
- 44 Liu H, Akiki S, Barrowman NJ, Bromwich M. Mobile endoscopy vs video tower: a prospective comparison of video quality and diagnostic accuracy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 155 (04) 575-580
- 45 Fransson BA, Ragle CA. Assessment of laparoscopic skills before and after simulation training with a canine abdominal model. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2010; 236 (10) 1079-1084
- 46 Fernandes CFK, Ruano JMC, Kati LM, Noguti AS, Girão MJBC, Sartori MGF. Assessment of laparoscopic skills of gynecology and obstetrics residents after a training program. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 2016; 14 (04) 468-472
- 47 Sum Ping ST, Mehta MP, Symreng T. Reliability of capnography in identifying esophageal intubation with carbonated beverage or antacid in the stomach. Anesth Analg 1991; 73 (03) 333-337
- 48 Smith A, Gagliardi F, Pelzer NR. et al. Rural neurosurgical and spinal laboratory setup. J Spine Surg 2015; 1 (01) 57-64
- 49 Ofstead CL, Smart AG, Hopkins KM, Wetzler HP. The utility of lighted magnification and borescopes for visual inspection of flexible endoscopes. Am J Infect Control 2023; 51 (01) 2-10
- 50 Liu JK, Page PS, Brooks NP. Development and validation of a low-cost endoscopic spine surgery simulator. Cureus 2021; 13 (07) e16541