Subscribe to RSS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60f12/60f1207d64e709348d01b6a01c0352d16ea3240a" alt=""
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1800865
Historiography of Scientific Publishing across Cultures and Disciplines
Funding None.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62d03/62d03dcaf9a153fb95e2e0c6b678b22fcbc1defa" alt=""
Abstract
Historiography is a vital perspective of our scientific literature that charts the evolution of scientific publishing, from its early origins to the present status. The key transformations including the shift from a limited self-published legacy to specialized and professional peer-reviewed journals, the impact of technological advancements, and the emergence of new profitable business models are learning points for the future course and couture. Science is pursued and persevered by real humans in social and cultural contexts and not in isolation of laboratories or clinics. Survival of the impartial pure scientific bent of mind and its translation into tangible works has not been easy through the turmoil of various forms of force majeure. The lack of gender parity and even its divergence in some ways was palpable in the discourse of scientific research. Despite that, when provided with a common platform with comparable impact factors and rates of publications, gender inequality seems to vanish and equivalence in academia is discernible. The roles of authors, publishers, and readers have also evolved chronologically, adapting to the influence of cultural and disciplinary factors through the ages. The challenges of predatory publishing, open access, plagiarism, and data capitalization are also growing alongside. Ultimately, understanding the historical context and persistence of the predecessors in the course of scientific publishing can enhance modern scientific research and communication.
Keywords
scientific publication - peer review - scientist - revolution - open access - digital publishing - scholarly communicationPublication History
Article published online:
09 January 2025
© 2025. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Mack C. 350 years of scientific journals. J Micro Nanolithogr MEMS MOEMS 2015; 14: 010101
- 2 Ghasemi A, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Bahadoran Z. Scientific publishing in biomedicine: a brief history of scientific journals. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2022; 21 (01) e131812
- 3 Ross S. Scientist: the story of a word. Ann Sci 1962; 18: 65-85
- 4 Claxton LD. Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Mutat Res 2005; 589 (01) 31-45
- 5 Albertine KH. A rich history of scientific and educational contributions: celebrating 125 years of the American Association of Anatomists. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2012; 295 (06) 900-901
- 6 Man J. The Gutenberg Revolution. New York, NY: Random House; 2010
- 7 Fyfe A. Publishing and the classics: Paley's natural theology and the nineteenth-century scientific canon. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A 2002; 33: 729-751
- 8 Silver S. Death of scientific journals after 350 years. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2018; 365 (14) fny130
- 9 Bishop PJ. The evolution of the British Journal of Radiology. Br J Radiol 1973; 46 (550) 833-836
- 10 Mabe M. The growth and number of journals. Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community 2003; 16: 191-197
- 11 Al Kawi MZ. History of medical records and peer review. Ann Saudi Med 1997; 17 (03) 277-278
- 12 Marta MM. A brief history of the evolution of the medical research article. Clujul Med 2015; 88 (04) 567-570
- 13 Bynum WF. The Lancet: the first to last. Lancet 1998; 352 (Suppl. 02) SII3-SII6
- 14 Sollaci LB, Pereira MG. The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey. J Med Libr Assoc 2004; 92 (03) 364-367
- 15 Spier R. The history of the peer-review process. Trends Biotechnol 2002; 20 (08) 357-358
- 16 Fire M, Guestrin C. Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's law in action. Gigascience 2019; 8 (06) 1-20
- 17 Salthammer T. Quality or quantity? Historic and current trends in scientific publishing. Indoor Air 2016; 26 (03) 347-349
- 18 Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193 (01) 265-275
- 19 Van Noorden R. The science that's never been cited. Nature 2017; 552 (7684) 162-164
- 20 Grossmann A, Brembs B. Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000 Res 2021; 10: 20
- 21 Haug CJ. No free lunch: what price plan s for scientific publishing?. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (12) 1181-1185
- 22 Shingareva I, Lizárraga-Celaya C. Relevant changes in scientific publishing in mathematics and physics. Publ Res Q 2012; 28: 294-306
- 23 Khan R, Goodman L, Mittelman D. Dragging scientific publishing into the 21st century. Genome Biol 2014; 15 (12) 556
- 24 Nagaraj A, Reimers I. Digitization and the market for physical works: evidence from the Google Books Project. Am Econ J Econ Policy 2023; 15: 428-458
- 25 Kousha K, Thelwall M, Rezaie S. Assessing the citation impact of books: the role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus. J Am Soc Inf Sci 2011; 62: 2147-2164
- 26 Michael H. Open access, data capitalism and academic publishing. Swiss Med Wkly 2018; 148: w14600
- 27 Laakso M, Welling P, Bukvova H, Nyman L, Björk B-C, Hedlund T. The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS One 2011; 6 (06) e2096-1
- 28 Das S, Chatterjee SS. Say no to evil: predatory journals, what we should know. Asian J Psychiatr 2017; 28: 161-162
- 29 Osman IR, Ahmed HAH. Bibliometric analysis of Sci-Hub downloads by Egyptian researchers. Scientometrics 2024; 129: 2371-2388
- 30 Correa JC, Laverde-Rojas H, Tejada J, Marmolejo-Ramos F. The Sci-Hub effect on papers' citations. Scientometrics 2022; 127: 99-126
- 31 Maddi A, Sapinho D. On the culture of open access: the Sci-Hub paradox. Scientometrics 2023; 128: 5647-5658
- 32 Quigley E, Holme I, Doyle DM. et al. “Data is the new oil”: citizen science and informed consent in an era of researchers handling of an economically valuable resource. Life Sci Soc Policy 2021; 17 (01) 9
- 33 Van Dalen HP. How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists. Scientometrics 2021; 126: 1675-1694
- 34 Sankey H. Fifty years of structure: William J. Devlin and Alisa Bokulich (Eds.): Kuhn's structure of scientific revolutions: 50 years on. Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science, volume 311. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2015, xi+199pp. €99 HB. Metascience 2016; 25: 65-70
- 35 Davis MM, Kroeger G. Recent changes in German health insurance under the Hitler government. N Engl J Med 1935; 212: 1037-1042
- 36 Abi-Rached JM, Brandt AM. Nazism and the Journal. N Engl J Med 2024; 390 (13) 1157-1161
- 37 Hernández Socha Y. Scientific encounters between Colombia and the United States analyzed through publishing practices in Caldasia journal: the birds of the Republic of Colombia as a publishing event. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 2020; 82: 101289
- 38 Huang J, Gates AJ, Sinatra R, Barabási A-L. Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117 (09) 4609-4616
- 39 Odone A, Salvati S, Bellini L. et al. The runaway science: a bibliometric analysis of the COVID-19 scientific literature. Acta Biomed 2020; 91 (9-S): 34-39
- 40 Mehra MR, Ruschitzka F, Patel AN. Retraction-Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis. Lancet 2020; 395 (10240): 1820
- 41 Mehra MR, Desai SS, Kuy S, Henry TD, Patel AN. Retraction: cardiovascular disease, drug therapy, and mortality in Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (26) 2582-2582
- 42 Vanelli M, Signorelli C, De Sanctis V. Foreword: research in times of pandemic COVID-19. Acta Biomed 2020; 91 (02) 11-12
- 43 Sever R. Biomedical publishing: past historic, present continuous, future conditional. PLoS Biol 2023; 21 (10) e3002234
- 44 Xu J, Kim S, Song M. et al. Building a PubMed knowledge graph. Sci Data 2020; 7 (01) 205
- 45 Di Ieva A, Stewart C, Suero Molina E. Large language models in neurosurgery. Adv Exp Med Biol 2024; 1462: 177-198