Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1800920
Ligament Augmentation as a Treatment for Partial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft: Case Report
Article in several languages: español | English Funding No member of the research team receives external funding or benefits from political affinities, family relationships, or any type of common interests.
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common knee injuries in young active patients, negatively impacting their sports activity. Clinical presentation typically includes a history of trauma accompanied by edema, pain, functional limitation, and a sense of joint instability. There are various clinical signs and MRI findings suggestive of the injury, although arthroscopy remains the definitive diagnostic method. Treatment goals aim to achieve optimal rehabilitation and functional recovery, early return to sports, and prevention of joint damage that could lead to premature knee degeneration. In partial tears, there is no consensus on whether to preserve the remaining bundle or perform total ligament reconstruction. Regarding the choice of surgical technique, anatomical reconstruction has been preferred, and for graft selection, autograft has been chosen, although there are different valid therapeutic options based on each patient's characteristics. This review presents the case of a 36-year-old male diagnosed with a partial ACL tear with an intact posterolateral bundle, following an axial load injury mechanism with the knee in flexion, clinically presenting with pain, limited mobility, and joint instability of the knee. Due to the patient's clinical and imaging characteristics, arthroscopy was chosen as the diagnostic and therapeutic method. Based on arthroscopic findings, ligament augmentation with a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft was performed, due to the mechanical advantages of the anatomical positioning of the bone tunnels offered by the surgical technique, as well as the biological advantages, such as preservation of joint proprioception, bone integration, and functional benefits of graft selection.
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament - ligament augmentation - autograft - bone-tendon-bone graft - arthroscopyEthical Considerations
It was not experimented on any patient; it was only the presentation of a clinical case.
Servicio de Traumatología y Ortopedia del Hospital Español, Ciudad de México, México.
Publication History
Received: 24 September 2024
Accepted: 06 November 2024
Article published online:
26 December 2024
© 2024. Sociedad Chilena de Ortopedia y Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Bibliografía
- 1 Baek GH, Carlin GJ, Vogrin TM, Woo SL, Harner CD. Quantitative analysis of collagen fibrils of human cruciate and meniscofemoral ligaments. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (357) 205-211
- 2 Arnoczky SP. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; (172) 19-25
- 3 Duthon VB, Barea C, Abrassart S, Fasel JH, Fritschy D, Ménétrey J. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (03) 204-213
- 4 Yazdi H, Torkaman A, Ghahramani M, Moradi A, Nazarian A, Ghorbanhoseini M. Short term results of anterior cruciate ligament augmentation in professional and amateur athletes. J Orthop Traumatol 2017; 18 (02) 171-176
- 5 Bak K, Scavenius M, Hansen S, Nørring K, Jensen KH, Jørgensen U. Isolated partial rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Long-term follow-up of 56 cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1997; 5 (02) 66-71
- 6 Siebold R, Fu FH. Assessment and augmentation of symptomatic anteromedial or posterolateral bundle tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (11) 1289-1298
- 7 Van Dyck P, De Smet E, Veryser J. et al. Partial tear of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee: injury patterns on MR imaging. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (02) 256-261
- 8 Volokhina YV, Syed HM, Pham PH, Blackburn AK. Two helpful MRI signs for evaluation of posterolateral bundle tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: A pilot study. Orthop J Sports Med 2015; 3 (08) 2325967115597641
- 9 Stone AV, Marx S, Conley CW. Management of partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: A review of the anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2021; 29 (02) 60-70
- 10 Fayard JM, Sonnery-Cottet B, Vrgoc G. et al. Incidence and risk factors for a partial anterior cruciate ligament tear progressing to a complete tear after nonoperative treatment in patients younger than 30 years. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7 (07) 2325967119856624
- 11 Sonnery-Cottet B, Colombet P. Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016; 102 (1, Suppl) S59-S67
- 12 Ouanezar H, Blakeney WG, Fernandes LR. et al. Clinical outcomes of single anteromedial bundle biologic augmentation technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with consideration of tibial remnant size. Arthroscopy 2018; 34 (03) 714-722
- 13 Matsushita T, Kuroda R, Nishizawa Y. et al. Clinical outcomes and biomechanical analysis of posterolateral bundle augmentation in patients with partial anterior cruciate ligament tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (04) 1279-1289
- 14 Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Iwasa J, Ryoke K, Kuriwaka M. Mechanoreceptors in the anterior cruciate ligament contribute to the joint position sense. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73 (03) 330-334
- 15 Dallo I, Chahla J, Mitchell JJ, Pascual-Garrido C, Feagin JA, LaPrade RF. Biologic approaches for the treatment of partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: A current concepts review. Orthop J Sports Med 2017; 5 (01) 2325967116681724
- 16 Gifstad T, Foss OA, Engebretsen L. et al. Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (10) 2319-2328
- 17 Xie X, Liu X, Chen Z, Yu Y, Peng S, Li Q. A meta-analysis of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 2015; 22 (02) 100-110
- 18 Chen W, Li H, Chen Y, Jiang F, Wu Y, Chen S. Bone–patellar tendon–bone autografts versus hamstring autografts using the same suspensory fixations in ACL reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7 (11) 2325967119885314
- 19 Yang Y-T, Cai Z-J, He M. et al. All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A review of advance and trends. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2022; 27 (03) 91