Evaluating the Impact of Improvements in a System-Wide Peer Support Program for Pediatric Critical Care Providers

Abstract

Health care providers are at risk of emotional distress and Second Victim Syndrome (SVS). We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of improvements in a system-wide peer support program in reducing emotional distress after an unanticipated adverse event, poor patient outcome, medical error, or patient-related injury. The Second Victim Experience and Support Tool was sent to all intensive care (intensive care unit [ICU]) providers (n = 900) in our health care system. The current survey results were compared with the same survey from 2020. The period between the surveys included increased peer supporters and awareness of peer support programs, rapid deployment of unit-based support, and the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. The response rate in 2022 increased to 40% (n = 364) from 28% (n = 266) in 2020. Respondents did not differ in age, gender, home unit, role, or years of experience. The number of providers who experienced psychological distress (42% to 33%; p = 0.02) and physical distress (26% to 17%; p = 0.01) decreased between surveys. Significant decreases occurred primarily in nurses and respiratory therapists. Consideration of turnover increased from 25% to 33% (p = 0.01). Desired support did not change between survey periods with “the ability to take time away” (74% and 73%), “a peaceful location to recover” (64% and 70%), and “a respected peer to discuss the details of what happened” (83% and 78%) being most desired. We demonstrate results consistent with the positive impact of a peer support program on staff and provider emotional distress and SVS in our pediatric health care system. A multidisciplinary peer support program is crucial to staff well-being and resilience in high-stress ICU and inpatient environments.

Keywords

second victim syndrome - peer support - pediatric - ICU

Publication History

Received: 25 June 2024

Accepted: 10 October 2024

Article published online:
26 December 2024

• References

• 1 Scott SD, Hirschinger LE, Cox KR, McCoig M, Brandt J, Hall LW. The natural history of recovery for the healthcare provider “second victim” after adverse patient events. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18 (05) 325-330
• 2 Seys D, Wu AW, Van Gerven E. et al. Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof 2013; 36 (02) 135-162
• 3 Pratt S, Kenney L, Scott SD, Wu AW. How to develop a second victim support program: a toolkit for health care organizations. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2012; 38 (05) 235-240 , 193
• 4 Wu AW. Medical error: the second victim: the doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ 2000; 320: 726-727
• 5 Coughlan B, Powell D, Higgins MF. The second victim: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 213: 11-16
• 6 Ozeke O, Ozeke V, Coskun O, Budakoglu II. Second victims in health care: current perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract 2019; 10: 593-603
• 7 Mitzman J, Jones C, McNamara S, Stobart-Gallagher M, King A. Curated collection for educators: five key papers about second victim syndrome. Cureus 2019; 11 (03) e4186
• 8 Grissinger M. Too many abandon the “second victims” of medical errors. P T 2014; 39 (09) 591-592
• 9 Mira JJ, Carrillo I, Guilabert M. et al; Spanish Second Victim Research Team. The second victim phenomenon after a clinical error: the design and evaluation of a website to reduce caregivers' emotional responses after a clinical error. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 (06) e203
• 10 Merandi J, Liao N, Lewe D. et al. Deployment of a second victim peer support program: a replication study. Pediatr Qual Saf 2017; 2 (04) e031
• 11 Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Bechamps G. et al. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann Surg 2010; 251 (06) 995-1000
• 12 West CP, Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD. Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions. J Intern Med 2018; 283 (06) 516-529
• 13 Dyrbye LN, West CP, Satele D. et al. Burnout among U.S. medical students, residents, and early career physicians relative to the general U.S. population. Acad Med 2014; 89 (03) 443-451
• 14 Heiss K, Clifton M. The unmeasured quality metric: burn out and the second victim syndrome in healthcare. Semin Pediatr Surg 2019; 28 (03) 189-194
• 15 DeCaporale-Ryan L, Sakran JV, Grant SB. et al. The undiagnosed pandemic: burnout and depression within the surgical community. Curr Probl Surg 2017; 54 (09) 453-502
• 16 Scott SD, Hirschinger LE, Cox KR. et al. Caring for our own: deploying a systemwide second victim rapid response team. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010; 36 (05) 233-240
• 17 Dukhanin V, Edrees HH, Connors CA, Kang E, Norvell M, Wu AW. Case: A second victim support program in pediatrics: successes and challenges to implementation. J Pediatr Nurs 2018; 41: 54-59
• 18 Burlison JD, Scott SD, Browne EK, Thompson SG, Hoffman JM. The second victim experience and support tool: validation of an organizational resource for assessing second victim effects and the quality of support resources. J Patient Saf 2017; 13 (02) 93-102
• 19 Wolf M, Smith K, Basu M, Heiss K. The prevalence of second victim syndrome and emotional distress in pediatric intensive care providers. J Pediatr Intensive Care 2021; 12 (02) 125-130
• 20 Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL. et al; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208
• 21 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
• 22 Scott SD, Hirschinger LE, Cox KR. Sharing the load. Rescuing the healer after trauma. RN 2008; 71 (12) 38-40 , 42–43