Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1801273
Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis Treated with Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
Authors
Funding The authors received no direct financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Inari Medical provided indirect financial support through writing assistance.
Abstract
Purpose The incidence of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) is rising, and few studies have assessed interventional treatment strategies. Here, we aim to evaluate outcomes following standalone mechanical thrombectomy for UEDVT.
Methods Retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients who underwent standalone mechanical thrombectomy for UEDVT between October 2019 and August 2023. Outcomes assessed included technical success (≥75% thrombus removal), intraprocedural adverse events, postprocedural hospital stay, and follow-up free from death, pulmonary embolism, and rethrombosis.
Results Mechanical thrombectomy was utilized in 14 patients during the study period. The median age was 44.0 years (interquartile range: 33.5, 57.0), and seven of the patients (50.0%) were female. All procedures were technically successful and completed in a single session with no serious adverse events. The median postprocedural stay was 2 days. At a median follow-up of 88 days, there were no mortalities, and 71.4% of patients (n = 10) were free of rethrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
Conclusion This analysis suggests that mechanical thrombectomy provides effective thrombus removal and can be safely completed in patients with UEDVT.
Reporting Guidelines
This article complies with the STROBE guidelines on reporting the results of cohort studies.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This study was approved by the Indiana University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board under the exempt process. For this type of study, formal research ethics committee review, informed consent, or consent for publication are not required. The research was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki principles.
Authors' Contribution
T.P. and C.M.D. contributed to the conceptualization, design, literature search, data acquisition and analysis, statistical analysis, and manuscript preparation, editing, and review. . S.D.B. contributed to the conceptualization, design, literature search, data acquisition, data analysis, and manuscript editing and review. S.D.B. takes responsibility for the integrity of the work as guarantor.
Publication History
Article published online:
07 January 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Potere N, Candeloro M, Porreca E, DI Nisio M. Management of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: an updated review of the literature. Minerva Med 2021; 112 (06) 746-754
- 2 Fuller T, Neville E, Shapiro J. et al. Comparison of aspiration thrombectomy to other endovascular therapies for proximal upper extremity deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2022; 10 (02) 300-305
- 3 Delluc A, Le Mao R, Tromeur C. et al. Incidence of upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis in western France: a community-based study. Haematologica 2019; 104 (01) e29-e31
- 4 Duijzer D, de Winter MA, Nijkeuter M, Tuinenburg AE, Westerink J. Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis and asymptomatic vein occlusion in patients with transvenous leads: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8: 698336
- 5 Winters JP, Callas PW, Cushman M, Repp AB, Zakai NA. Central venous catheters and upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in medical inpatients: the Medical Inpatients and Thrombosis (MITH) Study. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13 (12) 2155-2160
- 6 Joffe HV, Kucher N, Tapson VF, Goldhaber SZ. Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) FREE Steering Committee. Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis: a prospective registry of 592 patients. Circulation 2004; 110 (12) 1605-1611
- 7 Elman EE, Kahn SR. The post-thrombotic syndrome after upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in adults: a systematic review. Thromb Res 2006; 117 (06) 609-614
- 8 Beiswenger AC, Quereshy HA, Rouabhi M. et al. Midterm outcomes in patients with upper extremity deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020; 8 (06) 930-938.e2
- 9 Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J. et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest 2016; 149 (02) 315-352
- 10 Vik A, Holme PA, Singh K. et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of deep venous thrombosis in the upper extremities. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009; 32 (05) 980-987
- 11 Mahmoud O, Vikatmaa P, Räsänen J. et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis versus pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for upper extremity deep venous thrombosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Vasc Surg 2018; 51: 246-253
- 12 Kim HS, Patra A, Paxton BE, Khan J, Streiff MB. Catheter-directed thrombolysis with percutaneous rheolytic thrombectomy versus thrombolysis alone in upper and lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2006; 29 (06) 1003-1007
- 13 Teter K, Arko F, Muck P. et al. Aspiration thrombectomy for the management of acute deep venous thrombosis in the setting of venous thoracic outlet syndrome. Vascular 2020; 28 (02) 183-188
- 14 Dexter DJ, Kado H, Schor J. et al; CLOUT Investigators. Interim outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for deep vein thrombosis from the All-Comer CLOUT Registry. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2022; 10 (04) 832-840.e2
- 15 Jolly MA, Lockhart MM, Shah D. et al. Outcomes from a tertiary care center using a catheter thrombectomy system for managing acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2022; 10 (05) 1044-1050
- 16 Arnoldussen CWKP, Notten P, Brans R. et al. Clinical impact of assessing thrombus age using magnetic resonance venography prior to catheter-directed thrombolysis. Eur Radiol 2022; 32 (07) 4555-4564
- 17 Yuriditsky E, Narula N, Jacobowitz GR. et al. Histologic assessment of lower extremity deep vein thrombus from patients undergoing percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2022; 10 (01) 18-25
- 18 Silver MJ, Kawakami R, Jolly MA. et al. Histopathologic analysis of extracted thrombi from deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: mechanisms and timing. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 97 (07) 1422-1429
- 19 Abramowitz SD, Kado H, Schor J. et al; CLOUT Investigators. Six-month deep vein thrombosis outcomes by chronicity: analysis of the real-world ClotTriever Outcomes registry. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2023; 34 (05) 879-887.e4

