Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1801276
Precision and Customization: The Role of 3D Printing in Modern Prosthodontics
Authors
Abstract
Prosthodontics focuses on the design and fitting of dental prostheses. The advent of three-dimensional (3D) printing has revolutionized this field by transitioning from labor-intensive methods to precise, computer-aided techniques. This review assesses the impact of 3D printing on prosthodontics, highlighting technological advancements, applications, clinical outcomes, and future directions. A literature review was conducted on recent advancements in 3D printing technologies and materials, focusing on their precision and customization capabilities in dental prostheses. 3D printing technologies such as fused deposition modelling, stereolithography, selective laser sintering, continuous liquid interface production, digital light processing, and material jetting offer high precision and customization, enhancing the creation of dental implants, crowns, bridges, removable prosthodontics, orthodontic devices, and maxillofacial prosthetics. 3D printing has improved the accuracy, efficiency, and customization of dental prostheses, leading to better patient outcomes. Multimaterial printing technologies like lithography-based ceramic manufacturing enable the integration of various materials in a single print, further advancing the field. Challenges such as material limitations, cost, and technical expertise remain, necessitating ongoing research and development.
Publication History
Article published online:
16 April 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 American College of Prosthodontists (ACP). Facts and figures [Internet]. [cited June 10, 2023]. Accessed November 21, 2024 at: https://www.prosthodontics.org
- 2 Azari A, Nikzad S. The evolution of rapid prototyping in dentistry: a review. Rapid Prototyping J 2009; 15 (03) 216-225
- 3 Pitta J, Fehmer V, Sailer I, Hicklin SP. Monolithic zirconia multiple-unit implant reconstructions on titanium bonding bases. Int J Comput Dent 2018; 21 (02) 163-171
- 4 Wong KV, Hernandez A. A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mech Eng 2012; 2012: 1-10
- 5 Wang L, Zhang Z, Fu C, Fan D, Ma J, Li D. Accuracy of digital templates for dental implants placed in combination with guided bone regeneration (GBR): a 2- to 5-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017; 32 (01) 170-177
- 6 Revilla-León M, Özcan M. Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: Current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthodont 2019; 28 (02) 146-158
- 7 Dawood A, Marti Marti B, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J 2015; 219 (11) 521-529
- 8 Tymrak BM, Kreiger M, Pearce JM. Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 2014; 58: 242-246
- 9 Hull CW, Davis S. High-performance 3D printing materials. J Mater Res 2018; 33 (20) 3405-3411
- 10 Ventola CL. Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. P&T 2014; 39 (10) 704-711
- 11 Gao B, Yang Q, Zhao X, Jin G, Ma Y, Xu F. 4D bioprinting for biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol 2016; 34 (09) 746-756
- 12 Hems E, Knott NJ. 3D printing in prosthodontics. Faculty Dental Journal 2014; Oct; 5 (04) 152-7
- 13 Turner BN, Strong R, Gold SA. A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: II. Materials, dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness. Rapid Prototyping J 2014; 20 (03) 216-227
- 14 Ahn BK, Yun TS, Huh JJ, Lee MG, Lee H. Current status and future prospects of additive manufacturing in dentistry. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2016; 54 (02) 69-78
- 15 Osman RB, van der Veen AJ, Wismeijer D, Alharbi N. Effects of build angle on the accuracy and fit of 3D-printed implant surgical guides. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 117 (06) 761-767
- 16 Tanış MÇ, Akay C, Akçaboy TC, Şen M, Kavaklı PA, Sapmaz K. In vitro shear bond strength between fluorinated zirconia ceramic and resin cements. J Adv Prosthodont 2018; 10 (03) 205-210
- 17 Alharbi N, Osman RB, Wismeijer D. A review of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture techniques for removable denture fabrication. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2017; 25 (02) 113-120
- 18 Zhao L, Sun H, Zhang Y. Advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res A 2016; 104 (12) 3195-3203
- 19 Rasperini G, Pilipchuk SP, Flanagan CL. et al. 3D-printed bioresorbable scaffold for periodontal repair. J Dent Res 2015; 94 (9, Suppl): 153S-157S
- 20 Giannatsis J, Dedoussis V. Additive fabrication technologies applied to medicine and health care: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017; 38 (5–6): 486-504
- 21 Schwitalla A, Müller WD. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol 2013; 39 (06) 743-749
- 22 Tumbleston JR, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N. et al. Additive manufacturing. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science 2015; 347 (6228): 1349-1352
- 23 Patel N, Gohil P, Choudhary S. Comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated by stereolithography and fused deposition modeling. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2020; 20 (04) 407-412
- 24 Martelli N, Serrano C, van den Brink H. et al. Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 2016; 159 (06) 1485-1500
- 25 Fokkinga WA, van Uchelen J, Witter DJ, Mulder J, Creugers NH. Impression procedures for metal frame removable partial dentures as applied by general dental practitioners. Int J Prosthodont 2016; 29 (02) 166-168
- 26 Farsari M, Chichkov BN. Two-photon fabrication. Nat Photonics 2009; 3 (08) 450-452
- 27 Liu Q, Leu MC, Schmitt SM. et al. A novel porous surface structured dental implant with enhanced biomechanical properties. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019; 98: 75-84
- 28 Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115 (06) 760-767
- 29 Camardella LT, de Vasconcellos Vilella O, Breuning H. Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype 3-dimensional printers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 151 (01) 117-123
