RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1801315
CO2 Laser Technique versus Cold Steel: Is CO2 Laser Required as a Surgical Tool for Flawless Stapes Surgery?
Funding The authors declare that they did not receive financial support from agencies in the public, private, or non-profit sectors to conduct the present study.
Abstract
Introduction Stapedotomy is the standard of care in the surgical management of clinical otosclerosis. It is a precise and technically demanding craft requiring impeccable surgical skills. Both conventional and laser-assisted procedures aim to achieve closure of the air-bone gap (ABG) with minimum collateral damage.
Objective To compare the postoperative outcomes of conventional stapes surgery and CO2 laser-assisted surgery.
Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of the medical records of 74 adult patients who underwent stapedotomy at our center. The patients were divided into two groups for comparison: the “cold steel method” (CSM) group, which was composed of patients who had undergone conventional stapedotomy (manual microperforators/hand-held microdrill); and the “CO2 laser-assisted” (LA) group. The postoperative outcomes assessed at 3 and 6 months in both groups were analyzed and compared. The average operative time and complications of both groups were also compared.
Results The hearing outcomes presented statistically significant postoperative improvement in both groups. The LA group presented statistically significant better air conduction thresholds at 3 and 6 months (p < 0.05). The ABG and its degree of closure were statistically better at 3 months in the LA group; however, the difference became insignificant at 6 months. Transient vertigo was more common in the LA group (p < 0.01). There was no new sensorineural hearing loss in either group. The operative time was longer in the LA group.
Conclusion In experienced hands, both conventional and laser techniques can be used with equal ease and expectation of better outcomes. The CO2 laser is not an indispensable tool to achieve good surgical results on a routine basis.
Authors' Contributions
VK: manuscript preparation, literature search, and data collection; AG: study conception, study design, manuscript preparation, literature search, and editing and revision of the manuscript; and AS: study conception, study design, and editing and revision of the manuscript.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 07. Dezember 2022
Angenommen: 19. April 2023
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. Januar 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
Vikas Kumar, Anandita Gupta, A. Sethi. CO2 Laser Technique versus Cold Steel: Is CO2 Laser Required as a Surgical Tool for Flawless Stapes Surgery?. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2025; 29: s00441801315.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1801315
-
References
- 1 Antonelli PJ. Prevention and Management of Complications in Otosclerosis Surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2018; 51 (02) 453-462
- 2 Shea Jr JJ. Forty years of stapes surgery. Am J Otol 1998; 19 (01) 52-55
- 3 Mann WJ, Amedee RG, Fuerst G, Tabb HG. Hearing loss as a complication of stapes surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 115 (04) 324-328
- 4 Vincent R, Sperling NM, Oates J, Jindal M. Surgical findings and long-term hearing results in 3,050 stapedotomies for primary otosclerosis: a prospective study with the otology-neurotology database. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27 (8, Suppl 2) S25-S47
- 5 Schuknecht HF. Sensorineural hearing loss following stapedectomy. Acta Otolaryngol 1962; 54: 336-348
- 6 Buchman CA, Fucci MJ, Roberson Jr JB, De La Cruz A. Comparison of argon and CO2 laser stapedotomy in primary otosclerosis surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 2000; 21 (04) 227-230
- 7 Lesinski SG. Lasers for otosclerosis–which one if any and why. Lasers Surg Med 1990; 10 (05) 448-457
- 8 Lesinski SG, Palmer A. CO2 laser for otosclerosis: safe energy parameters. Laryngoscope 1989; 99 (6 Pt 2, Suppl 46) 9-12
- 9 Young E, Mitchell-Innes A, Jindal M. Lasers in stapes surgery: a review. J Laryngol Otol 2015; 129 (07) 627-633
- 10 Motta G, Moscillo L. Functional results in stapedotomy with and without CO(2) laser. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2002; 64 (05) 307-310
- 11 Altamami NM, Huyghues des Etages G, Fieux M. et al. Is one of these two techniques: CO2 laser versus microdrill assisted stapedotomy results in better post-operative hearing outcome?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 276 (07) 1907-1913
- 12 Fang L, Lin H, Zhang TY, Tan J. Laser versus non-laser stapedotomy in otosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Auris Nasus Larynx 2014; 41 (04) 337-342
- 13 Bartel R, Huguet G, Cruellas F, Hamdan M, Gonzalez-Compta X, Cisa E. Laser vs drill for footplate fenestration during stapedotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hearing results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278 (01) 9-14
- 14 Casazza GC, Thomas AJ, Dewey J, Gurgel RK, Shelton C, Meier JD. Variations in Stapes Surgery Cost within a Multihospital Network. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 161 (05) 835-841