Download PDF
Digestive Disease Interventions
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1801817
Invited Article

Percutaneous Biliary and Gallbladder Interventions: Where Should Interventional Radiology Be Headed?

Ahsun Riaz
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
,
Ali Husnain
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Interventional radiology (IR) has evolved significantly in the past three decades due to improvements in techniques and technologies. The role of IR in managing biliary and gallbladder disease is evolving. A factor that has influenced our ability to perform advanced procedures has been the progress in endoscopes and their availability to IR. In addition to urgent or emergent decompression for these tubular structures and hollow organs, IR can also perform definitive therapies such as stenting and lithotripsy. The main objective of our therapies should be to remove drains as quickly as possible to improve patients' quality of life. The evolution of IR's role in this space is ongoing and should focus beyond decompression on treating the disease and the patient.

Keywords

biliary interventions - future directions - endoscopy


Publication History

Received: 19 November 2024

Accepted: 14 December 2024

Article published online:
24 January 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Wallace MJ, Chin KW, Fletcher TB. et al; Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR). Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous drainage/aspiration of abscess and fluid collections. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (04) 431-435
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Saad WE, Wallace MJ, Wojak JC, Kundu S, Cardella JF. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, biliary drainage, and percutaneous cholecystostomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (06) 789-795
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Kwon CI, Lehman GA. Mechanisms of biliary plastic stent occlusion and efforts at prevention. Clin Endosc 2016; 49 (02) 139-146
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ballard DH, Alexander JS, Weisman JA, Orchard MA, Williams JT, D'Agostino HB. Number and location of drainage catheter side holes: in vitro evaluation. Clin Radiol 2015; 70 (09) 974-980
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Li AY, Ballard DH, D'Agostino HB. Biliary drainage catheters fluid dynamics: in vitro flow rates and patterns. Diagn Interv Imaging 2017; 98 (04) 355-358
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Kerlan Jr RK, Stimac G, Pogany AC, Ring EJ. Bile flow through drainage catheters: an in vitro study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 143 (05) 1085-1087
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Mathias S, Wiseman O. Silicone vs. polyurethane stent: the final countdown. J Clin Med 2022; 11 (10) 2746
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 McPherson SJ, Gibson RN, Collier NA, Speer TG, Sherson ND. Percutaneous transjejunal biliary intervention: 10-year experience with access via Roux-en-Y loops. Radiology 1998; 206 (03) 665-672
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Morita S, Kitanosono T, Lee D. et al. Comparison of technical success and complications of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage between patients with and without transplanted liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (05) 1149-1152
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Dinkel HP, Moll R, Gassel HJ. et al. Helical CT cholangiography for the detection and localization of bile duct leakage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173 (03) 613-617
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Robins C, Xiao N, Salem R, Malik A, Keswani RN, Riaz A. Percutaneous biliary neo-anastomosis or neo-duct creation using radiofrequency wires. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45 (03) 337-343
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Sperry C, Malik A, Reiland A. et al. Percutaneous cystic duct interventions and drain internalization for calculous cholecystitis in patients ineligible for surgery. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2023; 34 (04) 669-676
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Severini A, Cozzi G, Salvetti M, Mazzaferro V, Doci R. Management of complications from hepatobiliary surgery using the percutaneous transjejunal approach. Tumori 1997; 83 (06) 912-917
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Kim D, Bolus C, Iqbal SI. et al. Percutaneous transjejunal biliary access in 60 patients with bilioenteric anastomoses. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30 (01) 76-81.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Russell E, Yrizarry JM, Huber JS. et al. Percutaneous transjejunal biliary dilatation: alternate management for benign strictures. Radiology 1986; 159 (01) 209-214
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Husnain A, Malik A, Caicedo J. et al. Percutaneous biliary interventions via the modified Hutson loop in patients with biliary-enteric anastomoses: a retrospective study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47 (08) 1083-1092
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Husnain A, Aadam AA, Keswani R. et al. Outcomes of percutaneous endobiliary radiofrequency ablation in managing resistant benign biliary strictures: a retrospective analysis. Br J Radiol 2024;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Entezari P, Soliman M, Malik A. et al. How endoscopic guidance augments nonvascular image-guided interventions. Radiographics 2022; 42 (06) 1845-1860
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Husnain A, Aadam A, Borhani A, Riaz A. Atlas for cholangioscopy and cholecystoscopy: a primer for diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy in the biliary tree and gallbladder. Semin Intervent Radiol 2024; 41 (03) 278-292
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Auriemma F, De Luca L, Bianchetti M, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. Radiofrequency and malignant biliary strictures: an update. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11 (02) 95-102
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Bang JY, Arnoletti JP, Wagner A, Varadarajulu S. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: long-term problems with surgical approach. Gut 2024; 73 (03) 395-397
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Spaniolas K, Pryor A, Stefanidis D. et al. Multisociety research collaboration: timing of cholecystectomy following cholecystostomy drainage for acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38 (10) 6053-6059
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Riaz A, Trivedi P, Aadam AA. et al. Research priorities in percutaneous image- and endoscopy-guided interventions for biliary and gallbladder diseases: proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation Multidisciplinary Research Consensus Panel. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2022; 33 (10) 1247-1257
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L. et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2019; 51 (05) 472-491
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou IS. et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - updated October 2017. Endoscopy 2018; 50 (09) 910-930
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Buxbaum JL, Buitrago C, Lee A. et al. ASGE guideline on the management of cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94 (02) 207-221.e14
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Qumseya BJ, Jamil LH, Elmunzer BJ. et al. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the management of malignant hilar obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94 (02) 222-234.e22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar