RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1801830
Intraosseous Meningioma of the Frontal Bone: Management and Challenges in Autologous Bone Reconstruction
Autor*innen
Abstract
Intraosseous meningiomas, although uncommon, represent a distinctive and important subset of meningiomas. These slow-growing tumors arise from the arachnoid cells present in the meninges and infiltrate the adjacent bone, often presenting as palpable masses. This case report focuses on a female with a frontal bone intraosseous meningioma and its management and challenges, including autologous bone reconstruction (cranioplasty).
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. Januar 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Chen TC. Primary intraosseous meningioma. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2016; 27 (02) 189-193
- 2 Harary M, Tung JK, Sood S, Corrales CE, Smith T, Iorgulescu JB. Benign purely intraosseous meningioma of the skull: diagnosis and surgical outcomes. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 82 (Pt A): 36-42
- 3 Kwon SM, Ko Y, Bang SS. Primary intraosseous osteolytic meningioma: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Neurol 2019; 19 (01) 176
- 4 Yilmaz A, Musluman M, Aydin Y. Primary osteolytic intraosseous meningioma of the frontal bone. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2010; 44 (04) 415-418
- 5 Zakhari N, Torres C, Castillo M, Nguyen TB. Uncommon cranial meningioma: key imaging features on conventional and advanced imaging. Clin Neuroradiol 2017; 27 (02) 135-144
- 6 Capitelli-McMahon H, Kahlar N, Rahman S. Titanium versus autologous bone-based cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus 2023; 15 (05) e39516
- 7 van de Vijfeijken SECM, Münker TJAG, Spijker R. et al; CranioSafe Group. Autologous bone is inferior to alloplastic cranioplasties: safety of autograft and allograft materials for cranioplasties, a systematic review. World Neurosurg 2018; 117: 443-452.e8
- 8 Leão RS, Maior JRS, Lemos CAA. et al. Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32 (00) e31
- 9 Honeybul S, Morrison DA, Ho KM, Lind CRP, Geelhoed E. A randomised controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty: long-term follow-up. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160 (05) 885-891
- 10 Honeybul S, Morrison DA, Ho KM, Lind CRP, Geelhoed E. A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty. J Neurosurg 2017; 126 (01) 81-90
- 11 Gilardino MS, Karunanayake M, Al-Humsi T. et al. A comparison and cost analysis of cranioplasty techniques: autologous bone versus custom computer-generated implants. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (01) 113-117
- 12 Simpson D. The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1957; 20 (01) 22-39
- 13 Simon M, Gousias K. Grading meningioma resections: the Simpson classification and beyond. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2024; 166 (01) 28