PDF herunterladen
Semin intervent Radiol
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1802979
Review Article

Importance of Enteral Feeding: Enhancing Patient Care through Interventional Radiology

Abdifatah Omar
1   The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Hyeonseon Kim
2   Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Michelle Mai
1   The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Michelle Bae
1   The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Aaron Maxwell
2   Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Daehee Kim
2   Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Enteral feeding plays a vital role for patients who are unable to meet their nutritional needs through oral intake, providing benefit to those with conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease, postsurgical recovery, chronic dysphagia, dysfunctional gastrointestinal tract, and critical illness. The role of interventional radiologists in enteral access is expanding, reflecting our pivotal role in nutritional support in clinical practice. This review explores the development, comparative benefits, and clinical outcomes associated with enteral nutrition (EN), highlighting its strengths and weaknesses as compared to parenteral nutrition (PN). EN supports gut mucosal health and immune function by stimulating gastrointestinal systems' native cellular programs, while reducing infection risks compared to PN. Modern advancements in EN formulations and delivery methods have enhanced patient care, demonstrating improved survival rates, reduced hospital stays, and improved quality of life.

Keywords

enteral feeding - parenteral feeding - nutrition


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
04. April 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Gomes F, Baumgartner A, Bounoure L. et al. Association of nutritional support with clinical outcomes among medical inpatients who are malnourished or at nutritional risk: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2 (11) e1915138
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Chao K, Wang D, Yang H. et al. Beneficial effect of immune-enhanced enteral nutrition on immune function in patients with severe neurological diseases: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Front Nutr 2021; 8: 685422
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Suzuki Y, Kawasaki N, Urashima M, Odaira H, Noro T. Total enteral nutrition facilitates wound healing through preventing intestinal atrophy, keeping protein anabolism and suppressing inflammation. Gastroenterol Res 2009; 2 (04) 224-231
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ojo O, Keaveney E, Wang XH, Feng P. The effect of enteral tube feeding on patients' health-related quality of life: a systematic review. Nutrients 2019; 11 (05) 1046
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Kaegi-Braun N, Mueller M, Schuetz P, Mueller B, Kutz A. Evaluation of nutritional support and in-hospital mortality in patients with malnutrition. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (01) e2033433
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Baiu I, Spain DA. Enteral nutrition. JAMA 2019; 321 (20) 2040
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Schörghuber M, Fruhwald S. Effects of enteral nutrition on gastrointestinal function in patients who are critically ill. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3 (04) 281-287
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Chernoff R. An overview of tube feeding: from ancient times to the future. Nutr Clin Pract 2006; 21 (04) 408-410
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Barrocas A, Schwartz DB, Bistrian BR. et al. Nutrition support teams: institution, evolution, and innovation. Nutr Clin Pract 2023; 38 (01) 10-26
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Mohamed Elfadil O, Velapati SR, Patel J, Hurt RT, Mundi MS. Enteral nutrition therapy: historical perspective, utilization, and complications. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2024; 26 (08) 200-210
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Stephens RV, Randall HT. Use of concentrated, balanced, liquid elemental diet for nutritional management of catabolic states. Ann Surg 1969; 170 (04) 642-668
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Wilmore DW, Dudrick SJ. Growth and development of an infant receiving all nutrients exclusively by vein. JAMA 1968; 203 (10) 860-864
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Dudrick SJ, Wilmore DW, Vars HM, Rhoads JE. Can intravenous feeding as the sole means of nutrition support growth in the child and restore weight loss in an adult? An affirmative answer. Ann Surg 1969; 169 (06) 974-984
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Itkin M, DeLegge MH, Fang JC. et al; Society of Interventional Radiology, American Gastroenterological Association Institute, Canadian Interventional Radiological Association, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. Multidisciplinary practical guidelines for gastrointestinal access for enteral nutrition and decompression from the Society of Interventional Radiology and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute, with endorsement by Canadian Interventional Radiological Association (CIRA) and Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). Gastroenterology 2011; 141 (02) 742-765
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Wretlind A, Szczygieł B. [Total parenteral nutrition. History. Present time. Future]. Pol Merkuriusz Lek 1998; 4 (22) 181-185
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Jeejeebhoy KN. Enteral nutrition versus parenteral nutrition – the risks and benefits. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 4 (05) 260-265
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Claytor J, Kumar P, Ananthakrishnan AN, Colombel JF, Agrawal M, Ungaro RC. Mild Crohn's disease: definition and management. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2023; 25 (03) 45-51
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ponzo V, Pellegrini M, Cioffi I, Scaglione L, Bo S. The refeeding syndrome: a neglected but potentially serious condition for inpatients. A narrative review. Intern Emerg Med 2021; 16 (01) 49-60
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Pierre JF. Gastrointestinal immune and microbiome changes during parenteral nutrition. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2017; 312 (03) G246-G256
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 O'Keefe SJD, Lee RB, Anderson FP. et al. Physiological effects of enteral and parenteral feeding on pancreaticobiliary secretion in humans. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2003; 284 (01) G27-G36
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Wei T, Jia Y, Xue W, Ma M, Wu W. Nutritional effects of the enteral nutritional formula on regulation of gut microbiota and metabolic level in type 2 diabetes mellitus mice. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2021; 14: 1855-1869
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Olveira G, Tapia MJ, Ocón J. et al; Study Group of Hyperglycemia in Parenteral Nutrition: Nutrition Area of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN). Parenteral nutrition-associated hyperglycemia in non-critically ill inpatients increases the risk of in-hospital mortality (multicenter study). Diabetes Care 2013; 36 (05) 1061-1066
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Ferrucci-Da Silva C, Zhan L, Shen J. et al. Effects of total parenteral nutrition on drug metabolism gene expression in mice. Acta Pharm Sin B 2020; 10 (01) 153-158
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Sun H, Wang P, Maitiabula G. et al. Total parenteral nutrition drives glucose metabolism disorders by modulating gut microbiota and its metabolites. Microbiology 2021 [cited 2024 Dec 5]. Accessed January 30, 2025 at: 10.1101/2021.10.26.466009
    PubMed
  • 25 Church A, Zoeller S. Enteral nutrition product formulations: a review of available products and indications for use. Nutr Clin Pract 2023; 38 (02) 277-300
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Martin K, Gardner G. Home enteral nutrition: updates, trends, and challenges. Nutr Clin Pract 2017; 32 (06) 712-721
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Compher C, Bingham AL, McCall M. et al. Guidelines for the provision of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2022; 46 (01) 12-41
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Doley J. Enteral nutrition overview. Nutrients 2022; 14 (11) 2180
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Wang H, Huang C, Yang Y, Kong L, Zheng X, Shan X. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nasojejunal tube feeding for the prevention of pneumonia in adults who are critically ill. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2022; 46 (05) 1167-1175
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Shah A, Busch RA, Koepsel EK, Eisa M, Woods M, Palchaudhuri S. Who Places Feeding Tubes and in What Scenario?. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2023; 25 (08) 175-181
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Prabhakaran S, Doraiswamy VA, Nagaraja V. et al. Nasoenteric tube complications. Scand J Surg 2012; 101 (03) 147-155
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Karthikumar B, Keshava SN, Moses V, Chiramel GK, Ahmed M, Mammen S. Percutaneous gastrostomy placement by intervention radiology: techniques and outcome. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2018; 28 (02) 225-231
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Wollman B, D'Agostino HB, Walus-Wigle JR, Easter DW, Beale A. Radiologic, endoscopic, and surgical gastrostomy: an institutional evaluation and meta-analysis of the literature. Radiology 1995; 197 (03) 699-704
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Gauderer MWL, Ponsky JL, Izant Jr RJ. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980; 15 (06) 872-875
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Preshaw RM. A percutaneous method for inserting a feeding gastrostomy tube. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981; 152 (05) 658-660
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Laasch HU, Wilbraham L, Bullen K. et al. Gastrostomy insertion: comparing the options – PEG, RIG or PIG?. Clin Radiol 2003; 58 (05) 398-405
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Duszak Jr R, Mabry MR. National trends in gastrointestinal access procedures: an analysis of Medicare services provided by radiologists and other specialists. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14 (08) 1031-1036
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Day LW, Nazareth M, Sewell JL, Williams JL, Lieberman DA. Practice variation in PEG tube placement: trends and predictors among providers in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82 (01) 37-45
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Dos Santos ESV, De Oliveira GHP, De Moura DTH. et al. Endoscopic vs radiologic gastrostomy for enteral feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Metaanal 2023; 11 (06) 277-289
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Blondet A, Lebigot J, Nicolas G. et al. Radiologic versus endoscopic placement of percutaneous gastrostomy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: multivariate analysis of tolerance, efficacy, and survival. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (04) 527-533
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Ahmed Z, Iqbal U, Aziz M. et al. Outcomes and complications of radiological gastrostomy vs. percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for enteral feeding: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Res 2023; 16 (02) 79-91
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Kohli DR, Radadiya DK, Patel H, Sharma P, Desai M. Comparative outcomes of endoscopic and radiological gastrostomy tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis with GRADE analysis. Ann Gastroenterol 2022; 35 (06) 592-602
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Meine MC, Tusato IH, Hoffmeister N, Meine GC. Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for enteral feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2024; 48 (06) 667-677
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Righetti J, Morris S, Fotoohi M, La Selva D, Zehr T, Kozarek R. Is percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy safer than percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy?. Am J Interv Radiol. 2021; 5: 16
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Vidhya C, Phoebe D, Dhina C, Jayne S, Robert F. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) versus radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG): a comparison of outcomes at an Australian teaching hospital. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2018; 23: 136-140
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Strijbos D, Keszthelyi D, Gilissen LPL. et al. Percutaneous endoscopic versus radiologic gastrostomy for enteral feeding: a retrospective analysis on outcomes and complications. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7 (11) E1487-E1495
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Maudar KK. Total parenteral nutrition. Med J Armed Forces India 1995; 51 (02) 122-126
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Worthington P, Balint J, Bechtold M. et al. When is parenteral nutrition appropriate?. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2017; 41 (03) 324-377
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Matarese L. Composite Foods and Formulas, Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. In: Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease [Internet]. Elsevier; 2001. [cited 2024 Dec 5]. p. 245–60. Accessed January 30, 2025 at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780121931551500180
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Heyland DK, MacDonald S, Keefe L, Drover JW. Total parenteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1998; 280 (23) 2013-2019
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Harvey SE, Parrott F, Harrison DA. et al; CALORIES Trial Investigators. Trial of the route of early nutritional support in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 2014; 371 (18) 1673-1684
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Reignier J, Boisramé-Helms J, Brisard L. et al; NUTRIREA-2 Trial Investigators, Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis (CRICS) group. Enteral versus parenteral early nutrition in ventilated adults with shock: a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study (NUTRIREA-2). Lancet 2018; 391 (10116): 133-143
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Braunschweig CL, Levy P, Sheean PM, Wang X. Enteral compared with parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 74 (04) 534-542
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Wang CY, Wang TJ, Wu YC, Hsu CY. Higher caloric intake through enteral nutrition is associated with lower hospital mortality rates in patients with candidemia and shock in Taiwan. Acute Crit Care 2024; 39 (04) 573-582
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Elke G, van Zanten ARH, Lemieux M. et al. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care 2016; 20 (01) 117
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 56 McClave SA, DiBaise JK, Mullin GE, Martindale RG. ACG Clinical Guideline: nutrition therapy in the adult hospitalized patient. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111 (03) 315-334 , quiz 335
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 57 Lewis SR, Schofield-Robinson OJ, Alderson P, Smith AF. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition and enteral versus a combination of enteral and parenteral nutrition for adults in the intensive care unit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 6 (06) CD012276
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 58 Zhang G, Zhang K, Cui W, Hong Y, Zhang Z. The effect of enteral versus parenteral nutrition for critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2018; 51: 62-92
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 59 Masaki S, Kawamoto T. Comparison of long-term outcomes between enteral nutrition via gastrostomy and total parenteral nutrition in older persons with dysphagia: a propensity-matched cohort study. PLoS One 2019; 14 (10) e0217120
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 60 Honda Y, Momosaki R, Ogata N. Nasogastric tube feeding versus total parenteral nutrition in older dysphagic patients with pneumonia: retrospective cohort study. J Nutr Health Aging 2020; 24 (08) 883-887
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 61 Wheble GAC, Knight WR, Khan OA. Enteral vs total parenteral nutrition following major upper gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Surg 2012; 10 (04) 194-197
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 62 Gao X, Liu Y, Zhang L. et al. Effect of early vs late supplemental parenteral nutrition in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2022; 157 (05) 384-393
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 63 Lashinsky JN, Suhajda JK, Pleva MR, Kraft MD. Use of integrated clinical decision support tools to manage parenteral nutrition ordering: experience from an Academic Medical Center. Nutr Clin Pract 2021; 36 (02) 418-426
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 64 Sutton RT, Pincock D, Baumgart DC, Sadowski DC, Fedorak RN, Kroeker KI. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3 (01) 17
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 65 Alsharif DJ, Alsharif FJ, Aljuraiban GS, Abulmeaty MMA. Effect of supplemental parenteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition alone on clinical outcomes in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients 2020; 12 (10) 2968
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 66 Lord LM, McGinnis C, Densmore C. Addressing the unique needs and quality of life issues for adults receiving long-term home enteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract 2023; 38 (02) 257-276
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 67 Blumenstein I, Shastri YM, Stein J. Gastroenteric tube feeding: techniques, problems and solutions. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20 (26) 8505-8524
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 68 Cotogni P, Stragliotto S, Ossola M, Collo A, Riso S. On Behalf of the Intersociety Italian Working Group for Nutritional Support in Cancer. The role of nutritional support for cancer patients in palliative care. Nutrients 2021; 13 (02) 306
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 69 Doig GS, Heighes PT, Simpson F, Sweetman EA, Davies AR. Early enteral nutrition, provided within 24 h of injury or intensive care unit admission, significantly reduces mortality in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35 (12) 2018-2027
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 70 Koretz RL, Lipman TO. The presence and effect of bias in trials of early enteral nutrition in critical care. Clin Nutr 2014; 33 (02) 240-245
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 71 Hyeda A, Costa ÉSMD. Economic analysis of costs with enteral and parenteral nutritional therapy according to disease and outcome. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 2017; 15 (02) 192-199
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 72 Moore FA, Feliciano DV, Andrassy RJ. et al Early enteral feeding, compared with parenteral, reduces postoperative septic complications. . The results of a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 1992; 216 (02) 172-183
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 73 Gohel TD, Kirby DF. Access and complications of enteral nutrition support for critically ill patients. In: Seres DS, Way V, Iii CW. eds. Nutrition Support for the Critically Ill [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016: 63-79 [cited 2024 Dec 5]. Accessed January 30, 2025 at: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-21831-1_5
    Suche in Google Scholar