Minimally Invasive L5–S1 Anterior TLIF Cage Placement in Lateral ALIF Exposure as a Bailout Option for Low Iliocaval Junctions: Report of Four Cases

Abstract

The aim of this study was to demonstrate that anteriorly placed transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) footprint bullet cage is a safe and effective bailout option if difficult left common iliac vein (LCIV) anatomy is unexpectedly encountered during the L5–S1 lateral anterior lumbar interbody fusion (L-ALIF). This retrospective case series includes four patients who received anteriorly placed TLIF cages at L5–S1 during L-ALIF surgery. Demographics, complications, and clinical/radiographic results were collected. The analysis included four female patients with a mean age of 59.0 years and mean body mass index (BMI) of 23.9. Three patients had degenerative conditions and one patient had a deformity. All the patients had an LCIV obstructing the center of the L5–S1 disk space, and titanium TLIF bullet cages were placed and secured with washers and screws. The L5–S1 segmental lordosis increased by 8.3 ± 6.1 degrees with a final mean lordosis of 23.5 ± 8.4 degrees; the L5–S1 intradiskal angle increased by 12.0 ± 7.0 degrees with a final mean disk angle of 18.8 ± 7.0 degrees; the posterior disk height increased by 4.4 ± 2.7 mm with a final mean disk height of 8.0 ± 2.1 mm. The mean numerical rating scale (NRS) for back pain improved by 5.3 ± 2.5 and the mean NRS leg pain improved by 7.7 ± 2.5 over a mean follow-up of 14 months (range: 6–20). There have been no perioperative complications or implant failure to date. If challenging vascular anatomy is encountered during L-ALIF exposure that prevents ALIF footprint cage placement, proceeding with smaller TLIF bullet cage placement anteriorly rather than abandoning the surgical approach is a safe and effective option.

Keywords

L5–S1 spine - degenerative spondylosis - lateral ALIF - TLIF - single position surgery

Authors' Contributions

T.Y.K. contributed to acquisition of data and drafting of the article and gave final approval of submitted version. M.H.P. contributed to the conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, and revising the article, and gave final approval of the submitted version.

Ethical Approval

This research was approved by the medical center's institutional review board, the patients consented to the procedure, and the participants and any identifiable individuals consented to publication of his or her image.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. März 2025

• References

• 1 Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 2015; 1 (01) 2-18
• 2 Alhaug OK, Dolatowski FC, Thyrhaug AM, Mjønes S, Dos Reis JABPR, Austevoll I. Long-term comparison of anterior (ALIF) versus transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity score-matched register-based study. Eur Spine J 2024; 33 (03) 1109-1119
• 3 Farber SH, Zhou JJ, Rudy RF. et al. Single-position anterior and lateral lumbar fusion in the supine position: a novel technique for multilevel arthrodesis. World Neurosurg 2022; 168: 4-10
• 4 Orita S, Shiga Y, Inage K. et al. Technical and conceptual review on the L5–S1 oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery (OLIF51). Spine Surg Relat Res 2020; 5 (01) 1-9
• 5 Hernandez NS, Diaz-Aguilar LD, Pham MH. Single position L5–S1 lateral ALIF with simultaneous robotic posterior fixation is safe and improves regional alignment and lordosis distribution index. Eur Spine J 2024; 33 (09) 3583-3592
• 6 Jarrett CD, Heller JG, Tsai L. Anterior exposure of the lumbar spine with and without an “access surgeon”: morbidity analysis of 265 consecutive cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22 (08) 559-564
• 7 Menezes CM, Alamin T, Amaral R. et al. Need of vascular surgeon and comparison of value for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in lateral decubitus: Delphi consensus. Eur Spine J 2022; 31 (09) 2270-2278
• 8 Tribus CB, Belanger T. The vascular anatomy anterior to the L5-S1 disk space. Spine 2001; 26 (11) 1205-1208
• 9 Capellades J, Pellisé F, Rovira A, Grivé E, Pedraza S, Villanueva C. Magnetic resonance anatomic study of iliocava junction and left iliac vein positions related to L5-S1 disc. Spine 2000; 25 (13) 1695-1700
• 10 Inamasu J, Guiot BH. Vascular injury and complication in neurosurgical spine surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148 (04) 375-387
• 11 Chung NS, Jeon CH, Lee HD, Kweon HJ. Preoperative evaluation of left common iliac vein in oblique lateral interbody fusion at L5-S1. Eur Spine J 2017; 26 (11) 2797-2803
• 12 Pham MH, Gupta M, Stone LE, Osorio JA, Lehman RA. Minimally invasive L5-S1 oblique lumbar interbody fusion with simultaneous robotic single position posterior fixation: 2-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021; 21 (06) E543-E543
• 13 Derman PB, Ohnmeiss DD, Lauderback A, Guyer RD. Indirect decompression for the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 15 (06) 1066-1071
• 14 Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Millhouse PW. et al. L5/S1 fusion rates in degenerative spine surgery: a systematic review comparing ALIF, TLIF, and axial interbody arthrodesis. Clin Spine Surg 2016; 29 (04) 150-155
• 15 Teng I, Han J, Phan K, Mobbs R. A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF. J Clin Neurosci 2017; 44: 11-17
• 16 Lightsey IV HM, Pisano AJ, Striano BM. et al. ALIF versus TLIF for L5–S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis: ALIF demonstrates superior segmental and regional radiographic outcomes and clinical improvements across more patient-reported outcome measures domains. Spine 2022; 47 (11) 808-816
• 17 Singh V, Oppermann M, Evaniew N. et al. L5–S1 pseudoarthrosis rate with ALIF versus TLIF in adult spinal deformity surgeries: a retrospective analysis of 100 patients. World Neurosurg 2023; 175: e1265-e1276