Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806738
How I Do It

Imaging in Interventional Radiology: Breast Cryoablation

Sonia J. Giyanani
1   Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Brown University, Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Marianne E. Bonanno
1   Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Brown University, Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Derek Tang
1   Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Brown University, Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Robert C. Ward
1   Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Brown University, Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

The approach to breast cancer diagnosis and treatment has evolved significantly in recent years. Overall, there has been a shift away from aggressive surgical interventions, such as radical breast mastectomies and complete lymph node dissections, toward lumpectomies and sentinel node sampling.[1] Specifically for older patients with lower-risk cancers, less aggressive approaches and de-escalation therapies are being considered more frequently.[2] As a result, there have been more investigative efforts and interest in locoregional treatments of breast cancers, such as radiofrequency ablation,[3] cryoablation,[4] [5] high-intensity focused ultrasound,[6] and microwave ablation.[7] Of these, cryoablation is one of the most studied modalities and holds great promise for breast cancer treatment in the future.

Cryoablation uses either liquid nitrogen or argon gas to create freezing and thawing cycles within targeted tissue to induce cellular death.[8] The mechanism of cellular injury occurs through direct and indirect means. Direct injury results as osmotic shifts during a first freeze allow fluid efflux, cell shrinkage, and the formation of ice crystals within cells, which damage organelles and the cell membrane.[8] This is followed by a passive thaw, during which the intracellular compartment becomes hypertonic, and the intracellular fluid shift causes the cell to burst.[8] [9] By contrast, indirect injury occurs as a result of microvascular ischemia as ice crystals form within the blood vessels and lead to endothelial damage. Ischemia causes an inflammatory response, vascular permeability, tissue edema, and, subsequently, an immunologic response.[8] [9] [10]

The typical breast cryoablation procedure can be performed in less than 45 minutes and in an outpatient setting. Real-time image guidance is used to localize the primary lesion and accurately target the cancer percutaneously, typically only requiring local anesthetic. In contrast to standard more invasive interventions, breast cryoablation allows for quicker recovery times, better cosmetic outcomes, and decreased pain postprocedurally. Consequently, patients experience increased quality of life and decreased financial burden.[11]

Imaging remains a crucial component in the preprocedural workup, intraprocedural guidance, and postprocedural follow-up to monitor for cancer recurrence. In this article, we will highlight the different imaging modalities used during these different phases of care, as well as the benefits and limitations each has when utilized for percutaneous treatment via cryoablation.



Publication History

Article published online:
27 March 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Sacchini V, Norton L. Escalating de-escalation in breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 195 (02) 85-90
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Hughes KS, Schnaper LA, Berry D. et al; Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women 70 years of age or older with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (10) 971-977
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Kinoshita T, Takayama S, Takahashi M. et al. Multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and standardize radiofrequency ablation therapy for early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41 (16, Suppl):
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Fine RE, Gilmore RC, Dietz JR. et al. Cryoablation without excision for low-risk early-stage breast cancer: 3-year interim analysis of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in the ICE3 trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28 (10) 5525-5534
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Roubidoux MA, Sabel MS, Bailey JE, Kleer CG, Klein KA, Helvie MA. Small (< 2.0-cm) breast cancers: mammographic and US findings at US-guided cryoablation--initial experience. Radiology 2004; 233 (03) 857-867
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Peek MCL, Wu F. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of breast tumours. Ecancermedicalscience 2018; 12: 794
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Yu J, Han ZY, Li T. et al. Microwave ablation versus nipple sparing mastectomy for breast cancer ≤5 cm: a pilot cohort study. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 546883
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Mehta A, Oklu R, Sheth RA. Thermal ablative therapies and immune checkpoint modulation: Can locoregional approaches effect a systemic response?. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016; 2016: 9251375
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Baust JG, Gage AA. The molecular basis of cryosurgery. BJU Int 2005; 95 (09) 1187-1191
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Erinjeri JP, Clark TW. Cryoablation: mechanism of action and devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (8, Suppl): S187-S191
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Khan SY, Snitman A, Habrawi Z, Crawford S, Melkus MW, Layeequr Rahman R. The role of cryoablation in breast cancer beyond the oncologic control: COST and breast-Q patient-reported outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30 (02) 1029-1037
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Cooper SM, Dawber RP. The history of cryosurgery. J R Soc Med 2001; 94 (04) 196-201
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Guideline on the Use of Transcutaneous and Percutaneous Ablation for the Treatment of Benign and Malignant Tumors of the Breast. 2018 . Accessed May 27, 2024 at: https://www.breastsurgeons.org/docs/statements/Consensus-Guideline-on-the-Use-of-Transcutaneous-andPercutaneous-Methods-for-the-Treatment-of-Benign-andMalignant-Tumors-of-the-Breast.pdf
    PubMed
  • 14 Sabel MS, Kaufman CS, Whitworth P. et al. Cryoablation of early-stage breast cancer: work-in-progress report of a multi-institutional trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11 (05) 542-549
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Simmons RM, Ballman KV, Cox C. et al; ACOSOG Investigators. A phase II trial exploring the success of cryoablation therapy in the treatment of invasive breast carcinoma: results from ACOSOG (Alliance) Z1072. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23 (08) 2438-2445
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Littrup PJ, Jallad B, Chandiwala-Mody P, D'Agostini M, Adam BA, Bouwman D. Cryotherapy for breast cancer: a feasibility study without excision. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20 (10) 1329-1341
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Plevritis SK, Munoz D, Kurian AW. et al. Association of screening and treatment with breast cancer mortality by molecular subtype in US Women, 2000-2012. [published correction appears in JAMA. 2018 Feb 20;319(7):724] JAMA 2018; 319 (02) 154-164
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Niell BL, Freer PE, Weinfurtner RJ, Arleo EK, Drukteinis JS. Screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 2017; 55 (06) 1145-1162
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Zhang M, Mesurolle B, Theriault M, Meterissian S, Morris EA. Imaging of breast cancer-beyond the basics. Curr Probl Cancer 2023; 47 (02) 100967
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Chalfant JS, Hoyt AC. Breast density: current knowledge, assessment methods, and clinical implications. J Breast Imaging 2022; 4 (04) 357-370
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Bicchierai G, Di Naro F, De Benedetto D. et al. A review of breast imaging for timely diagnosis of disease. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18 (11) 5509
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Gurando AV, Babkina TM, Dykan IM, Kozarenko TM, Gurando VR, Telniy VV. Digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer detection associated with four asymmetry types. Wiad Lek 2021; 74 (04) 842-848
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Destounis SV, Morgan R, Arieno A. Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204 (02) 261-264
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Gao Y, Moy L, Heller SL. Digital breast tomosynthesis: update on technology, evidence, and clinical practice. Radiographics 2021; 41 (02) 321-337
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Sood R, Rositch AF, Shakoor D. et al. Ultrasound for breast cancer detection globally: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Oncol 2019; 5: 1-17
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Hashimoto BE, Morgan GN, Kramer DJ, Lee M. Systematic approach to difficult problems in breast sonography. Ultrasound Q 2008; 24 (01) 31-38
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Coffey K, Jochelson MS. Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening. Eur J Radiol 2022; 156: 110513
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Elder K, Matheson J, Nickson C. et al. Contrast enhanced mammography in breast cancer surveillance. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 199 (02) 221-230
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Jochelson MS, Lobbes MBI. Contrast-enhanced mammography: state of the art. Radiology 2021; 299 (01) 36-48
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 den Dekker BM, Bakker MF, de Lange SV. et al; DENSE Trial Study Group. Reducing false-positive screening MRI rate in women with extremely dense breasts using prediction models based on data from the DENSE trial. Radiology 2021; 301 (02) 283-292
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Moy L. Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 50 (02) 377-390
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Ulaner GA. PET/CT for patients with breast cancer: Where is the clinical impact?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213 (02) 254-265
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Hadebe B, Harry L, Ebrahim T, Pillay V, Vorster M. The role of PET/CT in breast cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13 (04) 597
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Roknsharifi S, Wattamwar K, Fishman MDC. et al. Image-guided microinvasive percutaneous treatment of breast lesions: Where do we stand?. Radiographics 2021; 41 (04) 945-966
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Pigg N, Gordillo C, Wang Y, Ward RC. Breast cancer cryoablation with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Br J Radiol 2022; 95 (1140) 20220480
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Corines MJ, Sogani J, Hogan MP, Mango VL, Bryce Y. The role of contrast-enhanced mammography after cryoablation of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222 (02) e2330250
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Sarikaya I, Sarikaya A, Albatineh AN, Tastekin E, Sezer YA. Is there a difference in FDG PET findings of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast with and without coexisting DCIS?. Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol 2020; 8 (01) 27-35
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Ward RC, Lourenco AP, Mainiero MB. Ultrasound-guided breast cancer cryoablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213 (03) 716-722
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Challapalli JV, Yoon JH, Ward RC. Breast cryoablation, from the AJR “How We Do It” special series. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL. et al; International Working Group on Image-guided Tumor Ablation, Interventional Oncology Sans Frontières Expert Panel, Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology, Standard of Practice Committee of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria -- a 10-year update. Radiology 2014; 273 (01) 241-260
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Huang ML, Lane DL, Santiago L. MRI-guided breast cryoablation with the patient in prone position. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222 (04) e2330754
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Adachi T, Machida Y, Fukuma E, Tateishi U. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings after percutaneous cryoablation of early breast cancer. Cancer Imaging 2020; 20 (01) 49
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Duran C, Ward RC, Dibble EH. 18F-FES PET/CT for post-cryoablation evaluation of breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24 (04) 337-340
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Smith TE, Lee D, Turner BC, Carter D, Haffty BG. True recurrence vs. new primary ipsilateral breast tumor relapse: an analysis of clinical and pathologic differences and their implications in natural history, prognoses, and therapeutic management. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 48 (05) 1281-1289
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Panet-Raymond V, Truong PT, McDonald RE. et al. True recurrence versus new primary: an analysis of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after breast-conserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81 (02) 409-417
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Poplack SP, Levine GM, Henry L. et al. A pilot study of ultrasound-guided cryoablation of invasive ductal carcinomas up to 15 mm with MRI follow-up and subsequent surgical resection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204 (05) 1100-1108
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar