RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1811549
The HEAD SAFE Protocol: A Proposed Instrument for Standardization of Mobilization of Head Neurosurgical Practice
Autor*innen
Today's practice is highly inconsistent institutionally and between clinicians and is frequently anecdotal tradition, personal habit, or defensive conservatism rather than evidence-based or physiology-led practice. This inconsistency puts patients at unnecessary risks of venous outflow obstruction, hematoma expansion after surgery, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, and wound dehiscence as well as delay in early rehabilitation and recovery of function.[1] [2] In neurosurgical critical care, the postoperative period is a window of risk where patient outcome decisions by positioning, mobilization, and monitoring are mandatory.[3] Among these, mobilization of the head after craniotomy or cranial surgery is yet to be standardized. Although seemingly simple, head position has profound physiological impacts on cerebral venous drainage, intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and CSF dynamics—all of which are critical to maximizing neurological recovery.[3] Although mobilization of the surgical patient in the early period is a well-established standard for advanced recovery practices in many specialties now, no guidelines have ever been universally adopted for mobilization of the head in neurosurgical postoperative patients, especially during the initial 72 hours.[4]
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. Dezember 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Cunha PD, Barbosa TP, Correia G. et al. The ideal patient positioning in spine surgery: a preventive strategy. EFORT Open Rev 2023; 8 (02) 63-72
- 2 De Cassai A, Geraldini F, Zarantonello F. et al. A practical guide to patient position and complication management in neurosurgery: a systematic qualitative review. Br J Neurosurg 2022; 36 (05) 583-593
- 3 Rozet I, Vavilala MS. Risks and benefits of patient positioning during neurosurgical care. Anesthesiol Clin 2007; 25 (03) 631-653 , x
- 4 Twomey R, Matthews TW, Nakoneshny S. et al. Impact of early mobilization on recovery after major head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13 (12) 2852
- 5 Muzumdar D. Safety in the operating room: neurosurgical perspective. Int J Surg 2007; 5 (04) 286-288
- 6 Pandit AS, Singhal P, Khawari S, Luoma AMV, Ajina S, Toma AK. The need for head protection protocols for craniectomy patients during rest, transfers and turning. Front Surg 2022; 9: 918886
- 7 Yeoh TY, Tan A, Manninen P, Chan VW, Venkatraghavan L. Effect of different surgical positions on the cerebral venous drainage: a pilot study using healthy volunteers. Anaesthesia 2016; 71 (07) 806-813
- 8 Wang Y, Liu B, Zhao T. et al. Safety and efficacy of a novel neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for elective craniotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg 2018; 130 (05) 1680-1691
- 9 Greisman JD, Olmsted ZT, Crorkin PJ. et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for cranial tumor resection: a review. World Neurosurg 2022; 163: 104-122.e2
- 10 Rahman RK, Ginalis EE, Patel Y. et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for craniotomies in the treatment of brain tumors: a systematic review. Neurochirurgie 2023; 69 (04) 101442

