Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1814775
Cleaning Efficacy, Debris Extrusion, and Instrument Separation during Root Canal Filling Removal using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, and Optimum Torque Reverse Motions: An In Vitro Study
Authors
Funding This research is funded by Damascus University (Grant Number 501100020595).
Abstract
Objectives
This study aims to address the Optimum Torque Reverse (OTR) efficacy in root canal obturationmaterials removal, the amount of apically extruded debris, and separating instruments (SI) as a complication compared to continuous rotational motion (CRM) and reciprocating motion (RM).
Materials and Methods
The sample involved 45 straight mandibular first premolars. The crowns were decoronated to standardize the length to 16 mm. The root canals were prepared up to a size 25 taper 0.06, obturated using the lateral compaction technique with a resin-based sealer, stored for 7 days, and divided according to the motion type used during retreatment into three groups (each group consisted of 15 samples); Group 1: CRM using Protaper Universal Retreatment system (D3 20 0.07 last file reach apical third), Group 2: RM using WaveOne Gold system Medium 25 0.07 variant taper, and Group 3: OTR motion using Protaper Universal Retreatment system (D3 20 0.07 last file reach apical third). The extruded debris weight was measured using an analytical balance. Samples were sectioned longitudinally and photographed at 20X magnification using an optical microscope. The images were analyzed in ImageJ to assess the percentage of residual obturation material. The number of SI during retreatment was recorded. Statistical Analysis Data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests at an α = 0.05 significance level.
Results
The results indicate that the incidence of SI during retreatment in the OTR motion group was higher than the CRM group and the RM group (p = 0.001). There were no significant differences among the groups regarding the amount of apically extruded debris and the percentage of residual obturation material (p >0.05).
Conclusion
The effectiveness of root canal obturation material removal and the amount of extruded debris during retreatment do not depend on the motion used. However, the OTR motion is associated with an increased risk of SI during retreatment.
Authors' Contributions
T.A. conceptualized the idea, provided the laboratory work, and contributed to the writing, documenting, and interpretation of data. M.A-T. conceptualized the idea and supervised the research. H.A. was the project admin. Y.A.T contributed to writing the main manuscript, made the revision, formatting, and re-editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Note
The presented article is a part of the MCS's study of author T.A., approved by the IRB, Damascus University College of Dentistry, Damascus, Syria (UDDS-76-20122021/SRC-1428).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Damascus University (UDDS-76-20122021/SRC-1428).
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects/caregivers involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
De-identified data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Publication History
Article published online:
20 January 2026
© 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Tabassum S, Khan FR. Failure of endodontic treatment: The usual suspects. Eur J Dent 2016; 10 (01) 144-147
- 2 Capar ID, Arslan H, Ertas H, Gök T, Saygılı G. Effectiveness of ProTaper Universal retreatment instruments used with rotary or reciprocating adaptive motion in the removal of root canal filling material. Int Endod J 2015; 48 (01) 79-83
- 3 Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: Preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2008; 41 (04) 339-344
- 4 Webber J. Shaping canals with confidence: WaveOne GOLD single-file reciprocating system. Roots 2015; 1 (03) 34-40
- 5 Gambarini G, Testarelli L, De Luca M. et al. The influence of three different instrumentation techniques on the incidence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2013; 4 (01) 152-155
- 6 Plotino G, Ahmed HM, Grande NM, Cohen S, Bukiet F. Current assessment of reciprocation in endodontic preparation: A comprehensive review–Part II: Properties and effectiveness. J Endod 2015; 41 (12) 1939-1950
- 7 Pedullà E, Corsentino G, Ambu E. et al. Influence of continuous rotation or reciprocation of optimum torque reverse motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2018; 51 (05) 522-528
- 8 J. MORITA Corporation. DentaPort ZX Set OTR brochure. Accessed April 13, 2024 at: http://www.jmoritaeurope.de/cms/files/MO_65827_Update_B_Dentaport_RZ_en.pdf
- 9 Kimura S, Ebihara A, Maki K, Nishijo M, Tokita D, Okiji T. Effect of optimum torque reverse motion on torque and force generation during root canal instrumentation with crown-down and single-length techniques. J Endod 2020; 46 (02) 232-237
- 10 Tantiwanichpun B, Kulvitit S. Efficiency and complications in root canal retreatment using nickel titanium rotary file with continuous rotation, reciprocating, or adaptive motion in curved root canals: A laboratory investigation. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23 (01) 871
- 11 Yılmaz K, Özyürek T. Apically extruded debris after retreatment procedure with Reciproc, ProTaper Next, and Twisted File Adaptive instruments. J Endod 2017; 43 (04) 648-651
- 12 Abd el-ghaffar sN, Abbas KF. Impact of different kinematics on debris extrusion using two different full sequences rotary NiTi files: An in vitro study. Egypt Dent J 2024; 70 (01) 937-944
- 13 Al Omari TMN, La Rosa GRM, Albanna RHI, Tabnjh A, Papale F, Pedullà E. The effect of different kinematics on apical debris extrusion with a single-file system. Odontology 2023; 111 (04) 910-915
- 14 Martins JNR, Silva EJNL, Marques D, Versiani MA. Influence of continuous rotation and optimal torque reverse kinematics on the cyclic fatigue strength of endodontic NiTi clockwise cutting rotary instruments. Dent J 2024; 12 (10) 317
- 15 Madarati AA, Al-Nazzawi AA, Sammani AMN, Alkayyal MA. The efficacy of retreatment and new reciprocating systems in removing a gutta-percha-based filling material. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2018; 13 (05) 452-458
- 16 Hu X, Peng Y, Sum CP, Ling J. Effects of concentrations and exposure times of sodium hypochlorite on dentin deproteination: Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy study. J Endod 2010; 36 (12) 2008-2011
- 17 Hambire A, Indi S, Ghatole K, Diwanji P, Sulgante S, Thimwala A. Comparative effectiveness of the Pro-Taper Universal Retreatment system (PTR) using four different techniques for removal of AH plus SEALER-an in vitro study. Eur Chem Bull 2023; 12: 2494-2497
- 18 Abboud T, Al-Tayyan M, Achour H, Alsayed Tolibah Y. Time required for root canal retreatment using continuous rotation, reciprocation, and optimum torque reverse motions: An in-vitro study. Cureus 2024; 16 (08) e67786
- 19 Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod 1991; 17 (06) 275-279
- 20 Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 2012; 38 (06) 850-852
- 21 Hassan E, Sharaan M, Ragab M. Cleaning efficacy and debris extrusion using XP-Endo Finisher and XP-Endo Finisher R as Supplementary Files during Retreatment: An in vitro Study. Eur Endod J 2022; 7 (01) 40-46
- 22 Gunes B, Yeter KY. The effect of cervical preflaring on the apical debris extrusion of single or multiple rotary Ni-Ti files. Niger J Clin Pract 2020; 23 (04) 510-514
- 23 Sariyilmaz E, Keskin C. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigant using XP-Endo Finisher, EndoActivator, passive ultrasonic irrigation or syringe irrigation. Meandros Med Dent J 2018 19. 02
- 24 Rios MdeA, Villela AM, Cunha RS. et al. Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal. J Endod 2014; 40 (04) 543-546
- 25 Topçuoğlu HS, Demirbuga S, Topçuoğlu G. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during the removal of canal filling material using three different Ni-Ti systems and hand files in teeth with simulated apical root resorption. Int Endod J 2020; 53 (03) 403-409
- 26 Labbaf H, Nazari Moghadam K, Shahab S, Mohammadi Bassir M, Fahimi MA. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris using Reciproc, ProTaper Universal, Neolix and Hyflex in curved canals. Iran Endod J 2017; 12 (03) 307-311
- 27 Karataş E, Arslan H, Kırıcı DÖ, Alsancak M, Çapar ID. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with Twisted File Adaptive instruments in straight root canals: Reciprocation with different angles, adaptive motion and continuous rotation. Int Endod J 2016; 49 (04) 382-385
- 28 Colaco AS, Pai VA. Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of manual and rotary gutta-percha removal techniques. J Endod 2015; 41 (11) 1871-1874
- 29 Bhagavaldas MC, Diwan A, Kusumvalli S, Pasha S, Devale M, Chava DC. Efficacy of two rotary retreatment systems in removing Gutta-percha and sealer during endodontic retreatment with or without solvent: A comparative in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2017; 20 (01) 12-16
- 30 Faus-Matoses V, Pasarín-Linares C, Faus-Matoses I, Foschi F, Sauro S, Faus-Llácer VJ. Comparison of obturation removal efficiency from straight root canals with ProTaper Gold or Reciproc Blue: A micro-computed tomography study. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (04) 1164
- 31 Yılmaz F, Koç C, Kamburoğlu K. et al. Evaluation of 3 different retreatment techniques in maxillary molar teeth by using micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2018; 44 (03) 480-484
- 32 Bago I, Suk M, Katić M, Gabrić D, Anić I. Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gutta-percha and an epoxy resin-based sealer from straight root canals. Int Endod J 2019; 52 (01) 105-113
- 33 Delai D, Jardine AP, Mestieri LB. et al. Efficacy of a thermally treated single file compared with rotary systems in endodontic retreatment of curved canals: A micro-CT study. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23 (04) 1837-1844
- 34 Alves FRF, Marceliano-Alves MF, Sousa JCN, Silveira SB, Provenzano JC, Siqueira Jr JF. Removal of root canal fillings in curved canals using either reciprocating single- or rotary multi-instrument systems and a supplementary step with the XP-Endo Finisher. J Endod 2016; 42 (07) 1114-1119
- 35 Zuolo AS, Mello Jr JE, Cunha RS, Zuolo ML, Bueno CE. Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary techniques for removing filling material during root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 2013; 46 (10) 947-953
- 36 Matta MC, de Araújo RPC, Dantas ELA, D'Assunção FLC, de Sousa FB. Comparative analysis of continuous versus reciprocating instruments in retreatment of flat-oval root canals. Iran Endod J 2021; 16 (04) 217-224
- 37 Koçak MM, Koçak S, Türker SA, Sağlam BC. Cleaning efficacy of reciprocal and rotary systems in the removal of root canal filling material. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19 (02) 184-188
- 38 Silva EJ, Teixeira JM, Kudsi N, Sassone LM, Krebs RL, Coutinho-Filho TS. Influence of apical preparation size and working length on debris extrusion. Braz Dent J 2016; 27 (01) 28-31
