Endoscopy 1999; 31(8): 641-646
DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-70
Special Topic
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ·New York

10. Appropriateness of Colonoscopy: Diarrhea [1]

J.-J. Gonvers*, M. Bochud**, B. Burnand**, F. Froehlich*, R. W. Dubois***, J.-P. Vader**
  • * Policlinique Médicale Universitaire, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • ** Institut Universitaire de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • *** Protocare Sciences, Santa Monica, USA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 1999 (online)

Introduction

The number of potential causes of diarrhea is very large. The easiest and most useful method of classifying diarrhea is according to its duration. The majority of cases of acute diarrhea are mild and caused by self-limiting infections or other processes, and thus no diagnostic intervention is indicated.

For patients with chronic diarrhea, diagnostic testing is usually indicated, but although endoscopy may be useful for patients with chronic diarrhea, it is unclear whether the initial procedure should be a flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy.

In November 1998, a multidisciplinary European expert panel convened in Lausanne, Switzerland, to discuss and develop criteria for the appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy, a widely-used procedure, regarded as highly accurate and safe. The RAND appropriateness method was chosen for this purpose, because it allows the development of appropriateness criteria based on published evidence and supplemented by explicit expert opinion. A detailed description of the RAND appropriateness method, including the literature search process [1], and of the whole process, as well as the global results of the panel [2], are published as separate articles in this issue of the Journal. The literature review was based on a systematic search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library conducted up to the end of 1997 and completed with some key articles published in 1998. Updating and revision of the literature review is currently ongoing.

This article presents a literature review on diarrhea that was provided to the panelists for study and comment prior to the panel meeting to support their ratings of appropriateness of use of colonoscopy in diarrhea. This article furthermore presents an overview of the main panel results related to diarrhea and a summary of published evidence and panel-based appropriateness criteria.

1 The European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE, Lausanne, Switzerland).

References

  • 1 Vader J P, Burnand B, Froehlich F, Dubois R W, Bochud M, Gonvers J J. The European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): Project and methods.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 572-578
  • 2 Vader J P, Froehlich F, Dubois R W, Beglinger C, Wietlisbach V, Pittet V, Ebel N, Gonvers J J, Burnand B. The European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): Conclusions and WWW site.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 687-694
  • 3 Gwee K A, Graham J C, McKendrick M W, Collins S M, Marshall J S, Walters S J, Read N W. Psychometric scores and persistence of irritable bowel after infectious diarrhoea.  Lancet. 1996;  347 150-153
  • 4 Selby W. Diarrhoea - differential diagnosis.  Australian Family Physician. 1990;  19 1683-1686
  • 5 Dupont H L. Guidelines on acute infectious diarrhea in adults.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;  92 1962-1975
  • 6 Levine J S, Decker B C (ed). Decision making in gastroenterology.  St. Louis, Missouri; Decker BC, 1985
  • 7 Lipsky M S, Adelman M. Chronic diarrhea: evaluation and treatment.  American Family Physician. 1993;  48 1461-1466
  • 8 Donowitz M, Kokke F T, Saidi R. Evaluation of patients with chronic diarrhea.  N Engl J Med. 1995;  332 725-729
  • 9 Neugut A I, Garbowski G C, Waye J D, Forde K A, Treat M R, Tsai J L, Lee W C. Diagnostic yield of colorectal neoplasia with colonoscopy for abdominal pain, change in bowel habits, and rectal bleeding.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;  88 1179-1183
  • 10 Patel Y, Pettigrew N M, Grahame G R, Bernstein C N. The diagnostic yield of lower endoscopy plus biopsy in nonbloody diarrhea.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 338-343
  • 11 Kalra L, Hamlyn A N. Comparative evaluation of investigations for colorectal carcinoma in symptomatic patients.  Postgrad Med J. 1988;  64 666-668
  • 12 Brenna E, Skreden K, Waldum H L, Marvik R, Dybdahl J H, Kleveland P M, Sandvik A K, Halvorsen T, Myrvold H E, Petersen H. The benefit of colonoscopy.  Scan J Gastroenterol. 1990;  25 81-88
  • 13 Lieberman D A, Smith F W. Screening for colon malignancy with colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;  86 946-951
  • 14 Meagher A P, Stuart M. Colonoscopy in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 315-321
  • 15 Marshall J B, Singh R, Diaz-Arias A A. Chronic, unexplained diarrhea: are biopsies necessary if colonoscopy is normal? (see comments).  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 372-376
  • 16 Prior A, Lessells A M, Whorwell P J. Is biopsy necessary if colonoscopy is normal?.  Dig Dis Sci. 1987;  32 673-676
  • 17 Rams H, Rogers A I, Ghandur-Mnaymneh L. Collagenous colitis.  Ann Intern Med. 1987;  106 108-113
  • 18 Marshall J B, Singh R, Diaz-Arias A A. Chronic, unexplained diarrhea: are biopsies necessary if colonoscopy is normal?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 372-376
  • 19 Zwas F R, Bonheim N A, Berken C A, Gray S. Diagnostic yield of routine ileoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 1441-1443
  • 20 Kundrotas L W, Clement D J, Kubik C M, Robinson A B, Wolfe P A. A prospective evaluation of successful terminal ileum intubation during routine colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 544-546
  • 21 Owens D M, Nelson D K, Talley N J. The irritable bowel syndrome: long-term prognosis and the physician-patient interaction.  Ann Intern Med. 1995;  122 107-112
  • 22 Manning A P, Thompson W G, Heaton K W, Morris A F. Towards positive diagnosis of the irritable bowel.  BMJ. 1978;  2 653-654
  • 23 American Gastroenterological Association. Medical position statement: irritable bowel syndrome.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 2118-2119
  • 24 Camilleri M, Prather C M. The irritable bowel syndrome: mechanisms and a practical approach to management.  Ann Intern Med. 1992;  116 1001-1008
  • 25 Read N W, Krejs G J, Read M G, Santa A CA, Morawski S G, Fordtran J S. Chronic diarrhea of unknown origin.  Gastroenterology. 1980;  78 264-271
  • 26 Pimentel R R, Achkar E, Bedford R. Collagenous colitis: a treatable disease with an elusive diagnosis.  Dig Dis Sci. 1995;  40 1400-1404
  • 27 Zins B J, Sandborn W J, Tremaine W J. Collagenous and lymphocytic colitis: subject review and therapeutic alternatives.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 1394-1400
  • 28 Halaby I A, Rantis P C, Vernava A M, Longo W E. Collagenous colitis: pathogenesis and management.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 573-578
  • 29 Bogomoletz W. Les colites microscopiques (colite collagène, colite lymphocytaire et autres formes): un concept nosologique unitaire. (Abstract).  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1996;  20 835-837
  • 30 Bohr J, Tysk C, Eriksson S, Jarnerot G. Collagenous colitis in Orebro, Sweden, an epidemiological study 1984 - 1993.  Gut. 1995;  37 394-397
  • 31 Tanner A R, Raghunath A S. Colonic inflammation and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration. An assessment of the frequency of the problem.  Digestion. 1988;  41 116-120
  • 32 Riddell R H, Tanaka M, Mazzoleni G. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as a possible cause of collagenous colitis: a case-control study.  Gut. 1992;  33 683-686
  • 33 Zins B J, Tremaine W J, Carpenter H A. Collagenous colitis: mucosal biopsies and association with fecal leukocytes.  Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1995;  70 430-433
  • 34 Tanaka M, Mazzoleni G, Riddell R H. Distribution of collagenous colitis: utility of flexible sigmoidoscopy.  Gut. 1992;  33 65-70
  • 35 Fekety R. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis. American College of Gastroenterology. Practice Parameters Committee.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;  92 739-750
  • 36 Gerding D N, Brazier J S. Optimal methods for identifying Clostridium difficile infections.  Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1993;  16 S439-442
  • 37 Fekety R, Shah A B. Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis.  JAMA. 1993;  269 71-75
  • 38 Katz D A, Lynch M E, Littenberg B. Clinical prediction rules to optimize cytotoxin testing for Clostridium difficile in hospitalized patients with diarrhea.  Am J Med. 1996;  100 487-495
  • 39 Finegold S M. Clinical considerations in the diagnosis of antimicrobial agent-associated gastroenteritis.  Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease. 1986;  4 87-91S
  • 40 Tedesco F J, Corless J K, Brownstein R E. Rectal sparing in antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis: a prospective study.  Gastroenterology. 1982;  83 1259-1260

1 The European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE, Lausanne, Switzerland).

Prof. Jean-Jacques Gonvers

Policlinique Médicale Universitaire

Rue César-Roux 19

CH-1005 Lausanne

Switzerland

Phone: + 41-21-3452323

Email: Jean-Jacques.Gonvers@inst.hospvd.ch