Zusammenfassung
Die darmassoziierten lymphatischen Gewebe, wie z. B. Peyer-Plaques und Appendix, nehmen ständig potenzielle Antigene aus dem Lumen auf, um gegebenenfalls eine spezifische Immunantwort einzuleiten. Dieses „Antigen-Sampling” erfolgt durch M-Zellen, spezialisierte Epithelzellen der Dome-Areale. M-Zellen weisen eine besondere Ultrastruktur auf und sind typischerweise in Kontakt mit intraepithelialen Lymphozyten. Durch Endozytose nehmen die M-Zellen Makromoleküle, Partikel und ganze Mikroorganismen an ihrer apikalen Membran auf, transportieren diese in Vesikeln zur basolateralen Membran und geben sie durch Exozytose zum Interzellularraum ab. Diese Übersicht umreißt die strukturellen und funktionellen Eigenschaften von M-Zellen im Verdauungstrakt des Menschen und verschiedener Labortiere. Spezialisierungen der M-Zellen für Antigenaufnahme und -transport umfassen u. a. die Zusammensetzung der apikalen Membran, ein im Vergleich zu Enterozyten modifiziertes Zytoskelett sowie eine taschenartige Einstülpung der basolateralen Membran, in der sich Lymphozyten und Makrophagen befinden. Die verfügbaren Marker zum Nachweis von M-Zellen werden für verschiedene Spezies vergleichend dargestellt; aktuelle Hypothesen zu Ursprung und Differenzierungsweg von M-Zellen werden zusammengefasst und kritisch diskutiert. Da M-Zellen von zahlreichen Pathogenen, wie z. B. Bakterien und Viren, als Eintrittsstelle benutzt werden und dieser Weg zukünftig für die orale Gabe von Impfstoffen und Medikamenten genutzt werden könnte, wird abschließend ein Überblick über die klinische Bedeutung der Antigenaufnahme durch M-Zellen gegeben.
Mechanisms of antigen uptake in the small and large intestine: The role of M cells in the initiation of immune reactions
The gut-associated lymphoid tissues, e. g., the Peyer’s patches and the appendix, constantly internalize antigenic material to rapidly generate an immune response, if necessary. This sampling of antigens is performed by specialized epithelial cells, the „membranous” or „microfold” (M) cells of the dome epithelia. M cells possess a unique ultrastructure and are typically in contact with lymphoid cells. They endocytose macromolecules and particles, including entire microorganisms, at their apical membrane, transport these in vesicles to their basolateral membrane, and exocytose them to the intercellular space. This article reviews the structural and functional characteristics of M cells in the digestive tract in humans and other species. Specializations of M cells for antigen uptake and transport comprise the composition of their apical membrane, a modified cytoskeleton as compared to enterocytes, and a large pocket-like invagination of the basolateral membrane populated by lymphocytes. Besides ultrastructural characteristics, histochemical markers are listed that are available for detecting M cells. The origin and differentiation pathways of M cells and enterocytes of the dome epithelium are outlined and critically commented on. Because M cells are known entry sites of various pathogens and, in the future, might be employed for the oral application of drugs and vaccines, the clinical relevance of M cells in health and disease is discussed.
Schlüsselwörter
Peyer-Plaques - Membranous (M) Cell - Antigen-Sampling - Immunantwort - Infektion - Vakzination - Mensch
Key words
Peyer’s Patches - Antigen Sampling - Membranous (M) Cell - Immune Response - Infection - Vaccination - Humans
Literatur
-
1
Bjarnason I, MacPherson A, Hollander D.
Intestinal permeability: an overview.
Gastroenterology.
1995;
108
1566-1581
-
2
Mowat A M, Viney J L.
The anatomical basis of intestinal immunity.
Immunol Rev.
1997;
156
145-166
-
3
Mayrhofer G, Brooks A.
Lymphopoiesis in lymphocyte-filled villi in the small intestine of the rat.
Clin Immumol Immunpathol (Abstract).
1995;
76
S55
-
4
Moghaddami M, Cummins A, Mayrhofer G.
Lymphocyte-filled villi: Comparison with other lymphoid aggregations in the mucosa of the human small intestine.
Gastroenterology.
1998;
115
1414-1425
-
5
Kanamori Y, Ishimaru K, Nanno M. et al .
Identification of novel lymphoid tissues in murine intestinal mucosa where clusters of c-kit+ IL- 7R+
Thy1+ lympho-hemopoietic progenitors develop.
J Exp Med.
1996;
184
1449-1459
-
6
Saito H, Kanamori Y, Takemori T. et al .
Generation of intestinal T cells from progenitors residing in gut cryptopatches.
Science.
1998;
280
275-278
-
7 Scicchitano R, Stanicz A, Ernst P, Bienenstock J. A common mucosal immune system revisited. In: Husband AJ Migration and homing of lymphod cells Orlando; CRC Press 1986 Vol. II: 1-34
-
8
Brandtzaeg P, Baekkevold E S, Farstad I N. et al .
Regional specialization in the mucosal immune system: What happens in the microcompartements?.
Immunol Today.
1999;
20
141-151
-
9
Brandtzaeg P, Farstad I N, Haraldsen G.
Regional specialization in the mucosal immune system: Primed cells do not always home along the same track.
Immunol Today.
1999;
20
267-277
-
10
Bienenstock J, McDermott M, Befus D, O’Neill M.
A common mucosal immunologic system involving the bronchus, breast and bowel.
Edv Exp Med Biol.
1979;
107
53-59
-
11
Westermann J, Pabst R.
How organ-specific is the migration of „naive” and „memory” T cells?.
Immunol Today.
1996;
17
278-282
-
12
Croitoru K, Ernst P P.
Leukocytes in the intestinal epithelium: An unusual immunological compartment revisited.
Reg Immunol.
1992;
4
63-69
-
13 Shanahan F. The intestinal immune system. In: Johanson LR Physiology of the gastrointestinal tract New York; Raven Press 1994 3rd edidtion: 643-684
-
14
Sim G K.
Intraepithelial lymphocytes and the immune system.
Adv Immunol.
1995;
58
297-343
-
15
Ferguson A.
Intraepithelial lymphocytes in the small intestine.
Gut.
1977;
18
921-937
-
16
Hirata I, Berrebi G, Austin L L, Keren D F, Dobbins W O.
Immunhistological characterization of intraepithelial and lamina propria lymphocytes in control ileum and colon and in inflammatory bowel disease.
Dig Dis Sci.
1986;
31
593-603
-
17
Possier P, Julius M.
Intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes: The plot thickens.
J Exp Med.
1994;
180
1185-1189
-
18
Dobbins W O.
Human intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes.
Gut.
1986;
27
972-98
-
19
Brandtzaeg P, Halstensen T S, Kett K. et al .
Immunobiology and immunopathology of human gut mucosa: Humoral immunity and intraepithelial lymphocytes.
Gastroenterology.
1989;
97
1562-1584
-
20
MacDonald T T, Spencer J, Viney J L, Williams C B, Walker-Smith J A.
Selective biopsy of Peyer’s patches during ileal endoscopy.
Gastroenterology.
1987;
93
1356-1362
-
21
Biewenga J, Rees E P, Sminia T.
Induction and regulation of IgA responses in the microenvironment of the gut.
Clin Immunol Immunpathol.
1993;
67
1-7
-
22 Cebra J J, Shroff K E. Peyer’s patches as inductive sites for IgA commitment. In: Ogra PL, Mestecky J, Lamm ME, Strober W, McGhee JR, Bienenstock J Handbook of mucosal immunology San Diego; Academic Press 1994: 151-158
-
23 Peyer J C. Exercitatio Anatomico-Medica de Glandulis Intestinorum. Schaffhausen; 1677
-
24
Griebel P J, Hein W R.
Expanding the role of Peyer’s patches in B-cell ontogeny.
Immunol Today.
1996;
17
30-39
-
25
Cornes J S.
Number, size and distribution of Peyer’s patches in the human small intestine.
Gut.
1965;
6
225-233
-
26
Bockman D E, Cooper M D.
Pinocytosis by epithelium associated with lymphoid follicles in the bursa of Fabricius, appendix, and Peyer’s patches. An electron microscopic study.
Am J Anat.
1973;
136
455-478
-
27
Owen R L, Jones A L.
Epithelial cell specialization within human Peyer’s patches: An ultrastructural study of intestinal lymphoid follicles.
Gastroenterology.
1974;
66
189-203
-
28
Owen R L.
Sequential uptake of horseradish peroxidase by lymphoid follicle epithelium of Peyer’s patches in the normal unobstructed mouse intestine: An ultrastructural study.
Gastroenterology.
1977;
72
440-451
-
29
Owen R L, Nemanic P.
Antigen processing structures of the mammalian tract: An SEM study of lymphoepithelial organs.
Scanning Electron Microsc.
1978;
11
367-378
-
30
Rosen L, Podjaski B, Bettmann I, Otto H F.
Observations on the ultrastructure and function of the so-called „microfold” or membraneous cells (M cells) by means of peroxidase as a tracer.
Virchows Arch [Pathol Anat].
1981;
390
289-312
-
31
Torres-Medina A.
Morphologic characteristics of the epithelial surface of aggregated lymphoid follicles (Peyer’s patches) in the small intestine of newborn gnotobiotic calves and pigs.
Am J Vet Res.
1981;
42
232-236
-
32
Madara J L, Bye W A, Trier J S.
Structural features of and cholesterol distribution in M-cell membranes in guinea pig, rat, and mouse Peyer’s patches.
Gastroenterology.
1984;
87
1091-1103
-
33
Rosner A J, Keren D F.
Demonstration of M cells in the specialized follicle-associated epithelium overlying isolated lymphoid follicles in the gut.
J Leukocyte Biol.
1984;
35
397-404
-
34
HogenEsch H, Felsburg P J.
Ultrastructure and alkaline phosphatase activity of dome epithelium of canine Peyer’s patches.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol.
1990;
24
177-186
-
35
Gebert A, Bartels H.
Occluding junctions in the epithelium of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) of the rabbit ileum and caecum.
Cell Tissue Res.
1991;
266
301-314
-
36
Liebler E M, Paar M, Pohlenz J F.
M cells in the rectum of calves.
Res Vet Sci.
1991;
51
107-114
-
37
Gebert A.
Identification of M-cells in the rabbit tonsil by vimentin immuno-histochemistry and in vivo protein transport.
Histochem Cell Biol.
1995;
104
211-220
-
38
Gebert A, Bartels H.
Ultrastructure and protein transport of M cells in the rabbit cecal patch.
Anat Rec.
1995;
241
487-495
-
39
Lowden S, Heath T.
Lymphoid tissues of the ileum in young horses: Distribution, structure, and epithelium.
Anat Embryol.
1995;
192
171-179
-
40
Beier R, Gebert A.
Kinetics of particle uptake in the domes of Peyer’s patches.
Am J Physiol.
1998;
275
G130-137
-
41
Owen R L, Pierce N F, Apple R T, Cray W C.
M cell transport of Vibrio cholerae from the intestinal lumen into Peyer’s patches: A mechanism for antigen sampling and for microbial transepithelial migration.
J Infect Dis.
1986;
153
1108-1118
-
42
Sanderson I R, Walker W A.
Uptake and transport of macromolecules by the intestine: Possible role in clinical disorders (an update).
Gastroenterology.
1993;
104
622-639
-
43
Bye W A, Allan C H, Trier J S.
Structure, distribution, origin of M cells in Peyer’s patches of mouse ileum.
Gastroenterology.
1984;
86
789-801
-
44
Neutra M R, Phillips T L, Mayer E L, Fishkind D J.
Transport of membrane-bound macromolecules by M cells in follicle-associated epithelium of rabbit Peyer’s patch.
Cell Tissue Res.
1987;
247
537-546
-
45
Atkins A M, Schofield G C.
Lymphoglandular complexes in the large intestine of the dog.
J Anat.
1972;
113
169-178
-
46
Naukkarinen A, Arstilla A U, Sorvari T E.
Morphological and functional differentiation of the surface epithelium of the bursa Fabricii in chicken.
Anat Rec.
1978;
191
415-432
-
47
Beezhold D H, Sachs H G, Van Alten P J.
The development of transport ability by embryonic follicle-associated epithelium.
J Reticuloendothel Soc.
1983;
34
143-152
-
48
Hanger J J, Heath T J.
The arrangement of gut-associated lymphoid tissue and lymph pathways in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus).
J Anat.
1994;
185
129-134
-
49
Davenport W D, Allen E R.
Dome epithelium and follicle-associated basal lamina pores in the avian bursa of Fabricius.
Anat Rec.
1995;
241
155-162
-
50
Owen R L, Ermak T H.
Structural specializations for antigen uptake and processing in the digestive tract.
Springer Semin Immunopathol.
1990;
12
139-152
-
51
Smith M W, Peacock M A.
„M” cell distribution in follicle-associated epithelium of mouse Peyer’s patch.
Am J Anat.
1980;
159
167-175
-
52
Smith M W, Jarvis L G, King I S.
Cell proliferation in follicle-associated epithelium of mouse Peyer’s patch.
Am J Anat.
1980;
159
157-166
-
53
Clark M A, Jepson M A, Simons N L, Booth T A, Hirst B H.
Differential expression of lectin-binding sites defines mouse intestinal M-cells.
J Histochem Cytochem.
1993;
41
1679-1687
-
54
Clark M A, Jepson M A, Simons N L, Hirst B H.
Differential surface characteristics of M cells from mouse intestinal Peyer’s patches and caecal patches.
Histochem J.
1994;
26
271-280
-
55
Gebert A, Fassbender S, Werner K, Weißferdt A.
The development of M cells in Peyer’s patches is restricted to specialized dome-associated crypts.
Am J Pathol.
1999;
154
1573-1582
-
56
Pappo J, Steger H J, Owen R L.
Differential adherence of epithelium overlying gut-associated lymphoid tissue.
Lab Invest.
1988;
58
692-697
-
57
Gebert A, Hach G, Bartels H.
Co-localization of vimentin and cytokeratins in M-cells of rabbit gut-associated lymphod tissue (GALT).
Cell Tissue Res.
1992;
269
331-340
-
58
Jepson M A, Simmons N L, Hirst G L, Hirst B H.
Identification of M cells and their distribution in rabbit intestinal Peyer’s patches and appendix.
Cell tissue Res.
1993;
273
127-136
-
59
Gebert A, Rothkötter H J, Pabst R.
Cytokeratin 18 is an M-cell marker in porcine Peyer’s patches.
Cell Tissue Res.
1994;
276
213-221
-
60
Meynell H M, Thomas N W, James P S. et al .
Up-regulation of microsphere transport across the follicle-associated epithelium of Peyer’s patch by exposure to Streptococcus pneumoniae R36a.
FASEB J.
1999;
13
611-619
-
61
Bhalla D K, Owen R L.
Cell renewal and migration in lymphoid follicles of Peyer’s patches and cecum - an autoradiographic study in mice.
Gastroenterology.
1982;
82
232-242
-
62
Morfitt D C, Pohlenz J FL.
Porcine colonic lymphoglandular complex: Distribution, structure, and epithelium.
Am J Anat.
1989;
184
41-51
-
63
Giannasca P J, Giannasca K T, Falk P, Gordon J I, Neutra M R.
Regional differences in glycoconjugates of intestinal M cells in mice: Potential targets for mucosal vaccines.
Am J Physiol.
1994;
267
G1108-1121
-
64
Gebert A, Hach G.
Differential binding of lectins to M cells and enterocytes in the rabbit cecum.
Gastroenterology.
1993;
105
1350-1361
-
65
Jepson M A, Clark M A, Simmons N L, Hirst B H.
Epithelial M cells in the rabbit caecal lymphoid patch display distinctive surface characteristics.
Histochemistry.
1993;
100
441-447
-
66
Sicinski P, Rowinsky J, Warchol J B, Bem W.
Morphometric evidence against lymphocyte-induced differentiation of M cell from absorptive cells in mouse Peyer’s patches.
Gastroenterology.
1986;
90
609-616
-
67
Schmedtje J F.
Some histochemical characteristics of lymphoepithelial cells of the rabbit appendic (Abstract).
Anat Rec.
1965;
151
412-413
-
68
Owen R L, Bhalla D K.
Cytochemical analysis of alkaline phosphatase and esterase activities and of lectin-binding and anionic sites in rat and mouse Peyer’s patch M cells.
Am J Anat.
1983;
168
199-212
-
69
Farstad I N, Halstensen T S, Fausa O, Brandtzaeg P.
Heterogeneity of M-cell-associated B and T cells in human Peyer’s patches.
Immunology.
1994;
83
457-464
-
70
Savidge T C, Smith M W, Mayel-Afshar S, Collins A J, Freeman T C.
Selective regulation of epithelial gene expression in rabbit Peyer’s patch tissue.
Pflügers Arch.
1994;
428
391-399
-
71
Pappo J.
Generation and characterization of monoclonal antibodies recognizing follicle epithelial M cells in rabbit gut-associated lymphoid tissues.
Cell Immunol.
1989;
120
31-41
-
72
Pappo J, Ermak T H, Steger H J.
Monoclonal antibody-directed targeting of fluorescent polystyrene microspheres to Peyer’s patch M cell.
Immunology.
1991;
73
277-280
-
73
Roy M J, Ruiz A, Varvayanis M.
A novel antigen is common to the dome epithelium of gut- and bronchus-associated lymphoid tissues.
Cell Tissue Res.
1987;
248
635-644
-
74
Falk P, Roth K A, Gordon J I.
Lectins are sensitive tools for defining the differentiation programs of mouse gut epithelial cell lineages.
Am J Physiol.
1994;
266
G987-G1003
-
75
Gebert A, Posselt W.
Glycoconjugate expression defines the origin and differentiation pathway of intestinal M-cells.
J Histochem Cytochem.
1997;
45
1341-1350
-
76
Ingber D E.
Cellular tensegrity: Defining new rules of biological design that governs the cytoskeleton.
J Cell Sci.
1993;
104
613-627
-
77
Jepson M A, Mason C M, Bennett M K, Simmons N L, Hirst B H.
Co-expression of vimentin and cytokeratins in M cells of rabbit intestinal lymphoid follicle-associated epithelium.
Histochem J.
1992;
24
33-39
-
78
Gebert A.
M-cells in the rabbit tonsil exhibit distinctive glycoconjugates in their apical membrane.
J Histochem Cytochem.
1996;
44
1033-1042
-
79
Gebert A, Hach G.
Vimentin antibodies stain membranous epithelial cells in the rabbit bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue (BALT).
Histochemistry.
1992;
98
271-273
-
80
Gebert A.
M cells in the rabbit palatine tonsil: The distribution, spatial arrangement and membrane subdomains as defined by confocal lectin histochemistry.
Anat Embryol.
1997;
195
353-358
-
81
Gebert A, Rothkötter H J, Pabst R.
M cells in Peyer’s patches of the intestine.
Int Rev Cytol.
1996;
167
91-159
-
82
Kucharzik T, Lügering N, Schmid K W. et al .
Human intestinal M cells exhibit enterocyte-like intermediate filaments.
Gut.
1998;
42
54-62
-
83
Pappo J, Ermak T H.
Uptake and translocation of fluorescent latex particles by rabbit Peyer’s patch follicle epithelium: A quantitative model for M cell uptake.
Clin Exp Immunol.
1989;
76
144-148
-
84
Jepson M A, Simmons N L, Savidge T C, James P S, Hirst B H.
Selective binding and transcytosis of latex microspheres by rabbit intestinal M cells.
Cell Tissue Res.
1993;
271
399-405
-
85
Powell D W.
Barrier function of epithelia.
Am J Physiol.
1981;
241
G275-288
-
86
Ducroc R, Heyman M, Beaufrere B, Morgat J L, Desjeux J F.
Horseradish peroxidase transport across rabbit jejunal and Peyer’s patches in vitro.
Am J Physiol.
1983;
245
G54-G58
-
87
Keljo D J, Hamilton J R.
Quantitative determination of macromolecular transport rate across intestinal Peyer’s patches.
Am J Physiol.
1983;
244
G637-644
-
88
Kumagai K.
A study about the intestinal absorptive mechanism of morphological compoments.
Osaka Med J.
1922;
21
497-522
-
89
Ogushi R.
Über den Eintrittsvorgang der Tuberkelbazillen durch den Darmtraktus und dessen pathogene Bedeutung insbesondere für die Phthisiogenese.
Kekkaku-Zassi (tuberculosis) Vol III.
1925;
7
37-39
-
90
LeFevre M E, Olivo R, Vanderhoff J W, Jeol D D.
Accumulation of latex in Peyer’s patches and its subsequent appearance in villi and mesenteric lymph nodes.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med.
1978;
159
298-302
-
91
Eldridge J H, Staas J K, Meulbroek J A. et al .
Biodegradable microspheres as a vaccine delivery system.
Mol Immunol.
1991;
28
287-294
-
92
Jepson M A, Simmons N L, O’Hagan D t, Hirst B H.
Comparison of poly(DL-lactido-co-glycolide) and polystyrene microsphere targeting to intestinal M cells.
J Drug Target.
1993;
1
245-249
-
93
Ermak T H, Dougherty E P, Bhagat H R, Kabok Z, Pappo J.
Uptake and transport of copolymer biodegradable microspheres by rabbit Peyer’s patch M cells.
Cell Tissue Res.
1995;
279
433-436
-
94
Wolf J L, Rubin D H, Finberg R. et al .
Intestinal M-cells: a pathway for entry of reovirus into the host.
Science.
1981;
212
471-472
-
95
Sicinski P, Rowinski J, Warchol J B.
Poliovirus type 1 enters the human host through M cells.
Gastroenterology.
1990;
98
56-58
-
96
Amerongen H M, Weltzin R, Farnet C M. et al .
Transepithelial transport of HIV- 1 by intestinal M cells: A mechanism for transmission of AIDS.
J Acq Immun Def Synd.
1991;
4
760-765
-
97
Marcial M A, Madara J L.
Cryptosporidium: Cellular localization, structural analysis of absorptive cell-parasite membrane-membrane interactions in guinea pigs, and suggestion of protozoan transport by M cells.
Gastroenterology.
1986;
90
83-594
-
98
Inman L R, Cantey I R.
Specific adherence of Escherichia coli (strain RDEC- 1) to membranous (M) cells of the Peyer’s patch in Escherichia coli diarrhea in the rabbit.
J Clin Invest.
1983;
71
1-8
-
99
Inman L R, Cantey J R.
Peyer’s patch lymphoid follicle epithelial adherence of a rabbit enteropathogenic Eschericia coli (strain RDEC- 1).
J Clin Invest.
1984;
74
90-95
-
100
Walker R I, Schmauder-Chock E A, Parker J L.
Selective association and transport of Campylobacter jejuni through M cells of rabbit Peyer’s patches.
Can J Microbiol.
1988;
34
1142-1147
-
101
Perdomo O JJ, Cavaillon J M, Huerre M. et al .
Acute inflammation causes epithelial invasion and mucosal destruction in experimental shigellosis.
J Exp Med.
1994;
180
1307-1319
-
102
Jones B D, Ghori N, Falkow S.
Salmonella typhimurium initiates murine infection by penetrating and destroying the specialized epithelial M cells of the Peyer’s patches.
J Exp Med.
1994;
180
15-23
-
103
Wolf J L, Kauffman R S, Finberg R. et al .
Determinants of reovirus interaction with the intestinal M cells and absorptive cells of murine intestine.
Gastroenterology.
1983;
85
291-300
-
104
Amerongen H M, Wilson G AR, Fields B N, Neutra M R.
Proteolytic processing of reovirus is required for adherence to intestinal M cells.
J Virol.
1994;
68
8428-8432
-
105
Moll L K, Cantey J R.
Peyer’s patch adherence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strain in rabbits.
Infect Immun.
1997;
65
3788-3793
-
106
Yamamoto T, Kamano T, Uchimura M, Iwanaga M, Yokota T.
Vibrio cholerae O1 adherence to villi and lymphoid follicle epithelium: In vitro model using formalin-treated human small intestine and correlation between adherence and cell-associated hemagglutinin levels.
Infect Immun.
1988;
56
3241-3250
-
107
Lelouard H, Reggio H, Mangeat P, Neutra M, Montcourrier P.
Mucin-related epitopes distinguish M cells and enterocytes in rabbit appendix and Peyer’s patches.
Infect Immun.
1999;
67
357-367
-
108
Giannasca P J, Giannasca K T, Leichtner A M, Neutra M R.
Human intestinal M cells display the sialyl Lewis A antigen.
Infect Immun.
1999;
67
946-953
-
109
Foster N, Clark M A, Jepson M A, Hirst B H.
Ulex europaeus 1 lectin targets microspheres to mouse Peyer’s patch M-cell in vivo.
Vaccine.
1998;
16
536-541
-
110
Clark M A, Hirst B H, Jepson M A.
M-cell surface β1 integrin expression and invasin-mediated targeting of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis to mouse Peyer’s patch M cells.
Infect Immun.
1998;
66
1237-1243
-
111
Giannasca P J, Neutra M R.
Interactions of microorganisms with intestinal M cells: Mucosal invasion and induction of secretory immunity.
Infect Agents Dis.
1994;
2
242-248
-
112
Frey A, Giannasca K T, Weltzin R. et al .
Role of the glycocalyx in regulating access of microparticles to apical plasma membranes of intestinal epithelial cells: Implications for microbial attachment and oral vaccine targeting.
J Exp Med.
1996;
184
1045-1059
-
113
Killian M, Mestecky J, Russell M W.
Defense mechanisms involving Fc-dependent functions of immunoglobulin A and their subversion by bacterial immunoglobulin A proteases.
Microbiol Rev.
1988;
52
296-303
-
114
Krahenbuhl J P, Neutra M R.
Molecular and cellular basis of immune protection of mucosal surfaces.
Physiol Rev.
1992;
72
853-879
-
115
Weltzin R, Lucia-Jandris P, Michetti P. et al .
Binding and transepithelial transport of immunoglobulins by intestinal M cells: Demonstration using monoclonal IgA antibodies against enteric viral proteins.
J Cell Biol.
1989;
108
1673-1685
-
116
Kato T.
A study of secretory immunoglobulin A on membranous epithelial cells (M cells) and adjacent absorptive cells of rabbit Peyer’s patches.
Gastroenterol Jpn.
1990;
25
15-23
-
117
Porta C, James P S, Phillips A D. et al .
Confocal analysis of fluorescent bead uptake by mouse Peyer’s patch follicle-associated M cells.
Exp Physiol.
1992;
77
929-932
-
118
Bjerke K, Brandtzaeg P, Fausa O.
T cell distribution is different in follicle-associated epithelium of human Peyer’s patches and villous epithelium.
Clin Exp Immunol.
1988;
74
270-275
-
119
Pappo J, Owen R L.
Absence of secretory component expression by epithelial cells overlying rabbit gut-associated lymphoid tissue.
Gastroenterology.
1988;
95
1173-1177
-
120
Futter C, Marsh M.
Endocytosis and pasta.
Trends Cell Biol.
1993;
3
316-318
-
121
Inman L R, Cantey J R, Formal S B.
Colonization, virulence, and mucosal interaction of an enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (strain RDEC- 1) expressing Shigella somatic antigen in the rabbit intestine.
J Infect Dis.
1986;
154
742-751
-
122
Jepson M A, Clark M A, Simmons N L, Hirst B H.
Actin accumulation sites of attachment of indigenous apathogenic segmented filamentous bacteria to mouse ileal epithelial cells.
Infect Immun.
1993;
61
4001-4004
-
123
Clark M A, Jepson M A, Simmons N L, Hirst B H.
Preferential interaction of Salmonella typhimurium with mouse Peyer’s patch M cells.
Res Microbiol.
1994;
145
543-552
-
124
Francis C L, Ryan T A, Jones B D, Smith S J, Falkow S.
Ruffles induced by Salmonella and other stimuli direct macropinocytosis of bacteria.
Nature.
1993;
364
638-642
-
125
Blok J, Mulder-Stapel A A, Ginsel L A, Daems W T.
Endocytosis in absorptive cells of cultured human small-intestinal tissue: horseradish peroxidase, lactoperoxidase, and ferritin as markers.
Cell Tissue Res.
1981;
216
1-13
-
126
Owen R L, Apple R T, Bhalla D K.
Morphometric and cytochemical analysis of lysosomes in rat Peyer’s patch follicle epithelium: Their reduction in volume fraction and acid phosphatase content in M cells compared to adjacent enterocytes.
Anat Rec.
1986;
216
521-527
-
127
Allan C H, Mendrick D L, Trier J S.
Rat intestinal M cells contain acidic endosomal-lysosomal compartments and express class II major histocompatibility complex determinants.
Gastroenterology.
1993;
104
698-708
-
128
Bennett K, Levine T, Ellis J S. et al .
Antigen processing for presentation by class II major histocompatibility complex requires cleavage by cathepsin E.
Eur J Immunol.
1992;
22
1519-1524
-
129
Finzi G, Cornaggia M, Capella C. et al .
Cathepsin E in follicle associated epithelium of intestine and tonsils: Localization to M cells and possible role in antigen processing.
Histochemistry.
1993;
99
201-211
-
130
Kirschner M, Weber K.
Cytoplasm and cell motility.
Curr Opin Cell Biol.
1989;
1
3-4
-
131
Gebert A, Willführ B, Pabst R.
The rabbit M-cell marker vimentin is present in epithelial cells of the tonsil crypt.
Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh).
1995;
115
697-700
-
132
Kracke A, Bartels H.
Colchicine inhibits transcytosis in M-cells of mouse Peyer’s patches (Abstract).
Mol Biol Cell.
1994;
5
43a
-
133
Jarry A, Robaszkiewicz M, Brousse N, Potet F.
Immune cells associated with M cells in the follicle-associated epithelium of Peyer’s patches in the rat. An electron- and immunoelectron-microscopic study.
Cell Tissue Res.
1989;
255
293-298
-
134
Rautenberg K, Cichon C, Heyer G, Demel M, Schmidt M A.
Immunocytochemical characterization of the follicle-associated epithelium of Peyer’s patches: Anti-cytokeratin 8 antibody (clone 4.1.18) as a molecular marker for rat M cells.
Eur J Cell Biol.
1996;
71
363-370
-
135
Kernéis S, Bogdanova A, Colucci-Guyon E, Kraehenbuhl J P, Pringault E.
Cytosolic distribution of villin in M cells from mouse Peyer’s patches correlates with the absence of a brush border.
Gastroenterology.
1996;
110
515-521
-
136
Gebert A, Jepson M A.
Is the epithelial origin of M cells controversial?.
(Letter) Gastroenterology.
1996;
111
1163
-
137
Schmedtje J F.
Lymphocyte positions in the dome epithelium of the rabbit appendix.
J Morphol.
1980;
166
179-195
-
138
Cheng H, Leblond C P.
Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cells types in the mouse small intestine. V. Unitarian theory of the origin of the four epithelial cells types.
Am J Anat.
1974;
141
537-562
-
139
Bjerknes M, Cheng H.
Clonal analysis of mouse intestinal epithelial progenitors.
Gastroenterology.
1999;
116
7-14
-
140
Savidge T C.
The life and times of an intestinal M cell.
Trend Microbiol.
1996;
4
301-306
-
141
Kernéis S, Bogdanova A, Kraehenbuhl J P, Pringault E.
Conversion by Peyer’s patch lymphocytes of human enterocytes into M cells that transport bacteria.
Science.
1997;
277
949-952
-
142 Smith M W, Peacock M A. Lymphocyte induced formation of antigen transporting „M” cells from fully differentiated mouse enterocytes. In: Robinson JWL, Dowling RH, Riecken EO Mechanisms of intestinal adaption Lancaster; MTP 1982 573-583
-
143
Clark M A, Jepson M A, Simmons N L, Hirst B H.
Selective binding and transcytosis of Ulex europaeus 1 lectin by mouse Peyer’s patch M-cells in vivo.
Cell Tissue Res.
1995;
282
455-461
-
144
Clark M A, Reed K A, Lodge J. et al .
Invasion of murine intestinal M cells by Salmonella typhimurium inv mutants severely deficient for invasion of cultured cells.
Infect Immun.
1996;
64
4363-4368
-
145
Marth T, Kelsall B L, Strober W, Zeitz M.
Mechanismen und Anwendung oraler Toleranz.
Z Gastroenterol.
1999;
37
165-185
-
146
Ermak T H, Owen R L.
Differential distribution of lymphcytes and accessory cells in mouse Peyer’s patches.
Anat Rec.
1986;
215
144-152
-
147
Bjerke K, Halstensen T S, Jahnsen F, Pulford K, Brandtzaeg P.
Distribution of macrophages and granulocytes expressing L1 protein (calprotectin) in human Peyer’s patches compared with normal ileal lamina propria and mesenteric lymph nodes.
Gut.
1993;
34
1357-1363
-
148
Kohbata S, Yokoyama H, Yabuuchi E.
Cytopathogenic effect of Salmonella typhi GIFU 10 007 on M cells of murine ileal Peyer’s patches in ligated ileal loops: an ultrastructural study.
Microbiol Immunol.
1986;
30
1225-1237
-
149
Owen R L, Nemanic P C, Stevens D P.
Ultrastructural observations on giardiasis in a murine model. I. Intestinal distribution, attachment, and relationship to the immune system of Giardia muris.
Gastroenterology.
1979;
76
757-769
-
150
Jepson M A, Clark M A.
Studying M cells and their role in infection.
Trends Microbiol.
1998;
9
359-365
-
151
Salk D.
Eradication of poliomyelitis in the United States: III. Poliovaccines - practical considerations.
Rev Infect Dis.
1980;
2
258-273
-
152
Ivanoff B, Levine M M, Lambert P H.
Vaccination against typhoid fever: Present status.
Bull World Health Organ.
1994;
72
957-971
-
153
Shalaby W SW.
Development of oral vaccines to stimulate mucosal and systemic immunity: barriers and novel strategies.
Clin Immunol Immunopathol.
1995;
74
127-134
-
154
Eldridge J H, Staas J K, Meulbroek J A, Tice T S, Gilley R M.
Biodegradable and biocompatible poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres as and adjuvant for staphylococcal enterotoxin B toxoid which enhances the level of toxin-neutralizing antibodies.
Infect Immun.
1991;
59
2978-2986
-
155
Maloy K J, Donachie A m, O’Hagan D T, Mowat A M.
Induction of mucosal and systemic immune responses by immunization with ovalbumin entrapped in poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles.
Immunology.
1994;
81
661-667
-
156
Wachsmann D, Klein J P, Scholler M. et al .
Serum and salivary antibody responses in rats orally immunized with Streptococcus mutans carbohydrate protein conjugate associated with liposomes.
Infect Immun.
1986;
52
408-413
-
157
Mowat A M, Maloy K J, Donachie A M.
Immune-stimulating complexes as adjuvants for inducing local and systemic immunity after oral immunization with protein antigens.
Immunology.
1993;
80
527-534
-
158
O’Hagan D T, Rahman D, McGee J P. et al .
Biodegradable microparticles as controlled release antigen delivery systems.
Immunology.
1991;
73
239-242
-
159 Panja A, Mayer L. Diversity and function of antigen-presenting cells in mucosal tissues. In: Ogra PL, Strober W, Mestecky J, McGhee JR, Lamm ME, Bienenstock J Handbook of mucosal immunology San Diego; Academic Press 1994: 177-183
-
160
Wolf J L, Dambrauskas R, Sharpe A H, Trier J S.
Adherence to and penetration of the intestinal epithelium by reovirus type 1 in neonatal mice.
Gastroenterology.
1987;
92
82-91
-
161
Savidge T C, Smith M W, James P S, Aldred P.
Salmonella-induced M-cell formation in germfree mouse Peyer’s patch tissue.
Am J Pathol.
1991;
139
177-184
-
162
Regoli M, Borghesi C, Bertelli E, Nicoletti C.
Uptake of a gram-positive bacterium (Streptococcus pneumoniae R36a) by M cells of rabbit Peyer’s patches.
Ann Anat.
1995;
177
119-124
-
163
Borghesi C, Regoli M, Bertelli E, Nicoletti C.
Modifications of the follicle-associated epithelium by short-term exposure to a non-intestinal bacterium.
J Pathol.
1996;
180
326-332
-
164
Borghesi C, Taussig M J, Nicoletti C.
Rapid appearance of M cells after microbial challenge is restricted at the periphery of the follicle-associated epithelium of Peyer’s patch.
Lab Invest.
1999;
79
1393
-
165
Roy M J, Walsh T J.
Histopathologic and immunohistochemical changes in gut-associated lymphoid tissues after treatment of rabbits with dexamethasone.
Lab Invest.
1992;
64
437-443
-
166
Savidge T C, Smith M W.
Cyclosporin-A reduces M cell numbers in antigen-stimulated mouse Peyer’s patches (Abstract).
J Physiol.
1990;
442
84P
-
167
Cuvelier C A, Quatacker J, Mielants H, Vos M, Veys E, Roels H J.
M-cells are damaged and increased in number inflamed human ileal mucosa.
Histopathology.
1994;
24
417-426
-
168
Smith M W.
Selective expression of brush border hydrolases by mouse Peyer’s patch and jejunal villus enterocytes.
J Cell Physiol.
1985;
124
219-225
-
169
Montcourrier P, Lelouard H, Mangeat P, Reggio H.
Apical membranes from M-cells and enterocytes have different binding capacity for monoclonal antibodies in rabbit appendix and Peyer’s patches (Abstract).
Mol Biol Cell.
1996;
7
89a
-
170
Liebler E M, Lemke C, Pohlenz J F.
Ultrastructural study of the uptake of ferritin by M cells in the follicle-associated epithelium in the small and large intestines of pigs.
Am J Vet Res.
1995;
56
725-730
-
171
Joel D D, Laissue J A, LeFevre M E.
Distribution and fate of ingested carbon particles in mice.
J Reticuloendothel Soc.
1978;
24
477-487
-
172
Amerongen H M, Weltzin R, Mack J A.
M cell-mediated antigen transport and monoclonal IgA antibodies for mucosal immune protection.
Ann NY Acad Sci.
1992;
664
18-26
-
173
Childers N K, Denys F R, McGee N F, Michalek S M.
Ultrastructural study of liposome uptake by M cells of rat Peyer’s patch: An oral vaccine system for delivery of purified antigen.
Reg Immunol.
1990;
3
8-16
-
174
Woode G N, Pohlenz J F, Gourley N E, Fagerland J A.
Astrovirus and Breda virus infections of dome cell epithelium of bovine ileum.
J Clin Microbiol.
1984;
19
623-630
-
175
Neutra M R, Kraehenbuhl J P.
Transepithelial transport and mucosal defence I: The role of M cells.
Trends Cell Biol.
1992;
2
134-138
-
176
Fujimura Y.
Functional morphology of microfold cells (M cells) in Peyer’s patches: Phagocytosis and transport of BCG by M cells into rabbit Peyer’s patches.
Gastroenterol Jpn.
1986;
21
325-335
-
177
Ackermann M R, Cheville N F, Deyoe B L.
Bovine ileal dome lymphoepithelial cells: Endocytosis and transport of Brucella abortus strain 19.
Vet Pathol.
1988;
25
28-35
-
178
Momotani E, Whipple D L, Thiermann A B, Cheville N F.
Role of M cells and macrophages in the entrance of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis into domes of ileal Peyer’s patches in calves.
Vet Pathol.
1988;
25
131-137
-
179
Grützkau A, Hanski C, Hahn H, Riecken E O.
Involvement of M cells in the bacterial invasion of Peyer’s patches: A common mechanism shared by Yersinia enterocolitica and other enteroinvasive bacteria.
Gut.
1990;
31
1011-1015
-
180
Autenrieth I B, Firsching R.
Penetration of M cells and destruction of Peyer’s patches by Yersinia enterocolitica: An ultrastructural and histological study.
J Med Microbiol.
1996;
44
285-294
Fußnoten
1 Unterstützt durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 280/C14, A17, C1)
Anschrift für die Verfasser
Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Andreas Gebert
Abteilung Anatomie 2
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
30623 Hannover
eMail: Gebert.Andreas@mh-hannover.de