PDF herunterladen
Semin Liver Dis 2000; 20(4): 523-532
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-13160
Copyright © 2000 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation

Mark S. Cattral1 , Leslie B. Lilly2 , Gary A. Levy2
  • 1Department of Surgery and the Multi Organ Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada and
  • 2Department of Medicine, and the Multi Organ Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
31. Dezember 2000 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Prevention of graft rejection while minimizing morbidity remains the single most important objective in liver transplantation. Advances in immunosuppression have provided excellent patient and graft survival with relatively low incidences of acute rejection. However, it is apparent that the toxicity of the present immunosuppressive drugs accounts for much of the morbidity after transplantation. Attention is now being focused on combination drug therapies to reduce morbidity while maintaining the excellent results achieved with present immunosuppressive agents.

KEYWORD

liver transplantation - immunosuppression - rejection

REFERENCES

  • 1 Dempster W. Kidney homotransplantation.  Br J Surg . 1953;  40 447-465
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Murray J, Merrill J, Harrison H. Prolonged survival of human-kidney homografts by immunosuppressive drug therapy.  N Engl J Med . 1963;  268 1315-1323
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Goodwin W, Kaufmann J, Mims M. Human renal transplantation. I. Clinical experiences with six cases of renal homotransplantation.  . 1963;  89 13-24
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Starzl T, Marchioro T, Waddell W. The reversal of rejection in human renal homografts with subsequent development of homograft tolerance.  Surg Gynecol Obstet . 1963;  117 385-395
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Hume D, Magee J, Kauffman H. Renal transplantation in man with modified recipients.  Ann Surg . 1963;  158 608-644
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Stegall M D, Wachs M E, Everson G. Prednisone withdrawal 14 days after liver transplantation with mycophenolate: a prospective trial of cyclosporine and tacrolimus.  Transplantation . 1997;  64 1755-1760
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Abbasoglu O, Levy M F, Brkic B B. Ten years of liver transplantation: an evolving understanding of late graft loss.  Transplantation . 1997;  64 1801-1807
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Magy N, Cribier B, Schmitt C. Effects of corticosteroids on HCV infection.  Int J Immunopharmacol . 1999;  21 253-261
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Everson G, Trouillot T, Wachs M. Early steroid withdrawal in liver transplantation is safe and beneficial.  Liver Transpl Surg . 1999;  5 S48-S57
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Sollinger H W. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients. U.S. Renal Transplant Mycophenolate Mofetil Study Group.  Transplantation . 1995;  60 225-232
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 The Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group. A blinded, randomized clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation [see comments].  Transplantation . 1996;  61 1029-1037
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kobashigawa J, Miller L, Renlund D. A randomized active-controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients. Mycophenolate Mofetil Investigators [see comments].  Transplantation . 1998;  66 507-515
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Azuma H, Binder J, Heemann U. Effects of RS61443 on functional and morphological changes in chronically rejecting rat kidney allografts.  Transplantation . 1995;  59 460-466
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Schmid C, Heemann U, Azuma H, Tilney N L. Rapamycin inhibits transplant vasculopathy in long-surviving rat heart allografts.  Transplantation . 1995;  60 729-733
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Eckhoff D E, McGuire B M, Frenette L R. Tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy versus tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation.  Transplantation . 1998;  65 180-187
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Fisher R A, Ham J M, Marcos A. A prospective randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil with neoral or tacrolimus after orthotopic liver transplantation.  Transplantation . 1998;  66 1616-1621
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Mamelok R, Klintmalm G, Langnas A. A randomized, double-blind comparitive study of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA), in combination with cyclosporine and cortcosteroids in liver transplant recipients.  Hepatology . 1999;  30 222A
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Hebert M F, Ascher N L, Lake J R. Four-year follow-up of mycophenolate mofetil for graft rescue in liver allograft recipients.  Transplantation . 1999;  67 707-712
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Papatheodoridis G V, O'Beirne J, Mistry P. Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in stable liver transplant patients with cyclosporine-induced renal impairment: a preliminary report.  Transplantation . 1999;  68 155-157
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Liu J, Farmer Jr D J, Lane W S. Calcineurin is a common target of cyclophilin-cyclosporin A and FKBP-FK506 complexes.  Cell . 1991;  66 807-815
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Borel J F, Feurer C, Gubler H U, Stahelin H. Biological effects of cyclosporin A: a new antilymphocytic agent.  Agents Actions . 1976;  6 468-475
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Borel J F, Kis Z L. The discovery and development of cyclosporine (Sandimmune).  Transplant Proc . 1991;  23 1867-1874
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Calne R Y, Rolles K, White D J. Cyclosporin A initially as the only immunosuppressant in 34 recipients of cadaveric organs: 32 kidneys, 2 pancreases, and 2 livers.  Lancet . 1979;  2 1033-1036
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Merion R M, White D J, Thiru S. Cyclosporine: five years' experience in cadaveric renal transplantation.  N Engl J Med . 1984;  310 148-154
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Starzl T E, Klintmalm G B, Porter K A. Liver transplantation with use of cyclosporin A and prednisone.  N Engl J Med . 1981;  305 266-269
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Cantarovich M, Barkun J S, Tchervenkov J I. Comparison of neoral dose monitoring with cyclosporine through levels versus 2-hr postdose levels in stable liver transplant patients.  Transplantation . 1998;  66 1621-1627
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Hemming A W, Greig P D, Cattral M S. A microemulsion of cyclosporine without intravenous cyclosporine in liver transplantation.  Transplantation . 1996;  62 1798-1802
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Pinson C W, Chapman W C, Wright J K. Experience with neoral versus sandimmune in primary liver transplant recipients.  Transpl Int . 1998;  11(Suppl 1) 278-283
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Levy G A, Rasmussen A, Mayer A D. Neoral in de novo liver transplantation: adequate immunosuppression without intravenous cyclosporine.  Liver Transpl Surg . 1997;  3 571-577
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Graziadei I W, Wiesner R H, Marotta P J. Neoral compared to Sandimmune is associated with a decrease in histologic severity of rejection in patients undergoing primary liver transplantation.  Transplantation . 1997;  64 726-731
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Grant D, Kneteman N, Tchervenkov J. Peak cyclosporine levels (Cmax) correlate with freedom from liver graft rejection: results of a prospective, randomized comparison of neoral and sandimmune for liver transplantation (NOF-8).  Transplantation . 1999;  67 1133-1137
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Levy G, Lake J, Beauregard-Zollinger L, Prestele H. Improved clinical outcomes for liver transplant recipients using cyclosporine blood level monitoring based on two-hour post-dose levels.  Transplantation (in press). 2000; 
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Kino T, Hatanaka H, Miyata S. FK-506, a novel immunosuppressant isolated from a Streptomyces. II. Immunosuppressive effect of FK-506 in vitro.  J Antibiot (Tokyo) . 1987;  40 1256-1265
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Kino T, Hatanaka H, Hashimoto M. FK-506, a novel immunosuppressant isolated from a Streptomyces. I. Fermentation, isolation, and physico-chemical and biological characteristics.  J Antibiot (Tokyo) . 1987;  40 1249-1255
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Starzl T E, Todo S, Fung J. FK 506 for liver, kidney, and pancreas transplantation.  Lancet . 1989;  2 1000-1004
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Todo S, Fung J J, Starzl T E. Single-center experience with primary orthotopic liver transplantation with FK 506 immunosuppression.  Ann Surg. 1994;  220 297-308 308 discussion-309 discussion
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 The U.S. Multicenter FK506 Liver Study Group. A comparison of tacrolimus (FK 506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression in liver transplantation.  N Engl J Med . 1994;  331 1110-1115
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 European FK506 Multicentre Liver Study Group. Randomised trial comparing tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporin in prevention of liver allograft rejection.  Lancet . 1994;  344 423-428
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Rolles K, Davidson B R, Burroughs A K. A pilot study of immunosuppressive monotherapy in liver transplantation: tacrolimus versus microemulsified cyclosporin.  Transplantation . 1999;  68 1195-1198
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Sehgal S N. Rapamune (RAPA, rapamycin, sirolimus): mechanism of action immunosuppressive effect results from blockade of signal transduction and inhibition of cell cycle progression.  Clin Biochem . 1998;  31 335-340
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Li Y, Li X C, Zheng X X. Blocking both signal 1 and signal 2 of T-cell activation prevents apoptosis of alloreactive T cells and induction of peripheral allograft tolerance.  Nat Med . 1999;  5 1298-1302
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Wells A D, Li X C, Li Y. Requirement for T-cell apoptosis in the induction of peripheral transplantation tolerance.  Nat Med . 1999;  5 1303-1307
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Luo H, Chen H, Daloze P. Inhibition of in vitro immunoglobulin production by rapamycin.  Transplantation . 1992;  53 1071-1076
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Poon M, Marx S O, Gallo R. Rapamycin inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell migration.  J Clin Invest . 1996;  98 2277-2283
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Poston R S, Billingham M, Hoyt E G. Rapamycin reverses chronic graft vascular disease in a novel cardiac allograft model.  Circulation . 1999;  100 67-74
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Kimball P M, Kerman R H, Kahan B D. Production of synergistic but nonidentical mechanisms of immunosuppression by rapamycin and cyclosporine.  Transplantation . 1991;  51 486-490
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Groth C G, Backman L, Morales J M. Sirolimus (rapamycin)-based therapy in human renal transplantation: similar efficacy and different toxicity compared with cyclosporine. Sirolimus European Renal Transplant Study Group.  Transplantation . 1999;  67 1036-1042
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Brattstrom C, Wilczek H, Tyden G. Hyperlipidemia in renal transplant recipients treated with sirolimus (rapamycin).  Transplantation . 1998;  65 1272-1274
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Kahan B D, Julian B A, Pescovitz M D. Sirolimus reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes despite lower cyclosporine doses in caucasian recipients of mismatched primary renal allografts: a phase II trial. Rapamune Study Group.  Transplantation . 1999;  68 1526-1532
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 McAlister V C, Gao Z, Peltekian K. Sirolimus-tacrolimus combination immunosuppression [letter].  Lancet . 2000;  355 376-377
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Wall W J, Ghent C N, Roy A. Use of OKT3 monoclonal antibody as induction therapy for control of rejection in liver transplantation.  Dig Dis Sci . 1995;  40 52-57
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Fung J, Starzl T. Prophylactic use of OKT3 in liver transplantation. A review.  Dig Dis Sci . 1991;  36 1427-1430
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 53 McDiarmid S V, Busuttil R W, Levy P. The long-term outcome of OKT3 compared with cyclosporine prophylaxis after liver transplantation.  Transplantation . 1991;  52 91-97
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Portela D, Patel R, Larson-Keller J J. OKT3 treatment for allograft rejection is a risk factor for cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplantation.  J Infect Dis . 1995;  171 1014-1018
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Langrehr J M, Glanemann M, Guckelberger O. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial with anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody for immunosuppressive induction therapy after liver transplantation.  Clin Transplant . 1998;  12 303-312
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 56 Nashan B, Moore R, Amlot P. Randomised trial of basiliximab versus placebo for control of acute cellular rejection in renal allograft recipients. CHIB 201 International Study Group [published erratum appears in Lancet 1997;15:350(9089):1484].  Lancet . 1997;  350 1193-1198
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 57 Nashan B, Light S, Hardie I R. Reduction of acute renal allograft rejection by daclizumab. Daclizumab Double Therapy Study Group.  Transplantation . 1999;  67 110-115
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 58 Vincenti F, Kirkman R, Light S. Interleukin-2-receptor blockade with daclizumab to prevent acute rejection in renal transplantation. Daclizumab Triple Therapy Study Group.  N Engl J Med . 1998;  338 161-165
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 59 Kneteman N, Roy A, Neuhaus P. Basiliximab (Simulect) effectively reduces the rate and severity of acute rejection episodes with no increase in side effects in adult liver transplant recipients.  Transplantation (in press). 2000; 
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 60 Hirose R, Roberts J P, Quan D. Experience with daclizumab in liver transplantation: renal transplant dosing without calcineurin inhibitors is insufficient to prevent acute rejection in liver transplantation.  Transplantation . 2000;  69 307-311
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 61 Eckhoff D, McGuire B, Sellers M. The safety and efficacy of a two-dose daclizumab (zenapax) induction therapy in liver transplant patients.  Transplantation . 1999;  67 S32
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 62 Emre S, Vanin A, Cervantes E. Use of daclizumab (zenapax) as initial immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients with kidney failure.  Transplantation . 1999;  67 S600
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 63 Feray C, Samuel D, Thiers V. Reinfection of liver graft by hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation.  J Clin Invest . 1992;  89 1361-1365
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 64 Gane E J, Portmann B C, Naoumov N V. Long-term outcome of hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation.  N Engl J Med . 1996;  334 815-820
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 65 Prieto M, Berenguer M, Rayon J M. High incidence of allograft cirrhosis in hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection following transplantation: relationship with rejection episodes.  Hepatology . 1999;  29 250-256
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 66 Sheiner P A, Schwartz M E, Mor E. Severe or multiple rejection episodes are associated with early recurrence of hepatitis C after orthotopic liver transplantation.  Hepatology . 1995;  21 30-34
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 67 Charlton M, Seaberg E. Impact of immunosuppression and acute rejection on recurrence of hepatitis C: results of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database.  Liver Transpl Surg . 1999;  5(Suppl 1) 107-114
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 68 Charlton M, Seaberg E, Wiesner R. Predictors of patient and graft survival following liver transplantation for hepatitis C.  Hepatology . 1998;  28 823-830
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 69 Zervos X A, Weppler D, Fragulidis G P. Comparison of tacrolimus with microemulsion cyclosporine as primary immunosuppression in hepatitis C patients after liver transplantation.  Transplantation . 1998;  65 1044-1046
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 70 Trouillot T E, Shrestha R, Kam I. Successful withdrawal of prednisone after adult liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis [see comments].  Liver Transpl Surg . 1999;  5 375-380
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 71 Watson C J, Friend P J, Jamieson N V. Sirolimus: a potent new immunosuppressant for liver transplantation.  Transplantation . 1999;  67 505-509
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 72 Torras J, Figueras J, Lama C. Mycophenolate mofetil overlap in liver transplant recipients with chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity.  Transplant Proc . 1999;  31 2430
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 73 Herrero J I, Quiroga J, Sangro B. Conversion of liver transplant recipients on cyclosporine with renal impairment to mycophenolate mofetil.  Liver Transpl Surg . 1999;  5 414-420
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 74 Sher L S, Cosenza C A, Michel J. Efficacy of tacrolimus as rescue therapy for chronic rejection in orthotopic liver transplantation: a report of the U.S. Multicenter Liver Study Group.  Transplantation . 1997;  64 258-263
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 75 McDiarmid S V, Busuttil R W, Ascher N L. FK506 (tacrolimus) compared with cyclosporine for primary immunosuppression after pediatric liver transplantation. Results from the U.S. Multicenter Trial.  Transplantation . 1995;  59 530-536
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 76 Alvarez F, Atkison P R, Grant D R. NOF-11: a one-year pediatric randomized double-blind comparison of neoral versus sandimmune in orthotopic liver transplantation.  Transplantation . 2000;  69 87-92
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 77 Cox K L, Lawrence-Miyasaki L S, Garcia-Kennedy R. An increased incidence of Epstein-Barr virus infection and lymphoproliferative disorder in young children on FK506 after liver transplantation.  Transplantation . 1995;  59 524-529
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 78 Chiba K, Yanagawa Y, Masubuchi Y. FTY720, a novel immunosuppressant, induces sequestration of circulating mature lymphocytes by acceleration of lymphocyte homing in rats. I. FTY720 selectively decreases the number of circulating mature lymphocytes by acceleration of lymphocyte homing.  J Immunol . 1998;  160 5037-5044
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 79 Yanagawa Y, Sugahara K, Kataoka H. FTY720, a novel immunosuppressant, induces sequestration of circulating mature lymphocytes by acceleration of lymphocyte homing in rats. II. FTY720 prolongs skin allograft survival by decreasing T cell infiltration into grafts but not cytokine production in vivo.  J Immunol . 1998;  160 5493-5499
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 80 Larsen C P, Elwood E T, Alexander D Z. Long-term acceptance of skin and cardiac allografts after blocking CD40 and CD28 pathways.  Nature . 1996;  381 434-438
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 81 Kirk A D, Burkly L C, Batty D S. Treatment with humanized monoclonal antibody against CD154 prevents acute renal allograft rejection in nonhuman primates.  Nat Med . 1999;  5 686-693
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar