GRAM-STAIN DIAGNOSIS OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS AFTER RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES

ABSTRACT

Correlation of the Gram stains prior to and after rupture of the membranes (ROM) and the efficacy of Gram-stain diagnosis for bacterial vaginosis (BV) after membrane rupture has not previously been evaluated. From April 1997 to May 1998, women presenting in labor or for labor induction were invited to participate. Women with ROM prior to hospital presentation or contraindications for vaginal delivery were excluded. A Gram stain of vaginal secretions was obtained prior to and approximately 2 hours after ROM. BV was diagnosed with a Nugent score of 7-10. The Gram stain prior to and after membrane rupture was evaluated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Population characteristics (n = 91) included maternal age of 15 to 38 years, 45 (49%) nulliparas, 59 (65%) African-Americans, 23 (25%) Hispanics, 7 (8%) Caucasian, and 2 (2%) Asians. Gestational age upon study entry was 35 to 44 weeks. Twenty-one percent (19 of 91) of the study population was diagnosed with BV. Using the Gram stain prior to membrane rupture as the standard, the efficacy of the Gram stain after ROM had a sensitivity of 26%, specificity of 97%, positive predictive value of 71%, and negative predicative value of 83%. Good correlation of pre- and post-membrane rupture Gram stains was demonstrated (r = 0.69). Gram stain may be useful for ruling out BV in the presence of membrane rupture, but is not useful for diagnosing BV due to poor sensitivity.

KEYWORD

BV diagnosis - rupture of membranes - Gram stain

REFERENCES

• 1 Nugent R P, Krohn M A, Hillier S L. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation.  J Clin Microbiol . 1991;  29 297-301
• 2 Schwebke J R, Hillier S L, Sobel J D. Validity of the vaginal Gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.  Obstet Gynecol . 1996;  88 573-576
• 3 Amsel R, Totten P A, Spiegel C A. Non-specific vaginitis: diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiological associations.  Am J Med . 1983;  74 14-22
• 4 Spiegel C A, Amsel R, Holmes K K. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct Gram stain of vaginal fluid.  J Clin Microbiol . 1983;  18 170-177
• 5 Mazulli T, Simor A E, Low D E. Reproducibility of interpretation of Gram-stained vaginal smears for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.  J Clin Microbiol . 1990;  28 1506-1508
• 6 Joesoef R M, Hillier S L, Josodiwondo S, Linnan M. Reproducibility of a scoring system for Gram stain diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.  J Clin Microbiol . 1991;  29 1730-1731
• 7 Mastrobattista J M, Bishop K, Newton E R. The correlation of wet smear versus vaginal Gram stain diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in asymptomatic pregnant patients.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1998;  178 (abstract 760) S210
• 8 Kurki T, Sivonen A, Renkonen O. Bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy and pregnancy outcome.  Obstet Gynecol . 1992;  80 173-177
• 9 McGregor J A, French J I, Parker R. Prevention of premature birth by screening and treatment for common genital tract infections: results of a prospective controlled evaluation.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1995;  173 157-167
• 10 Hillier S L, Nugent R P, Eschenbach D A. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant.  N Engl J Med . 1995;  333 1737-1742