PDF herunterladen
Semin Hear 2000; 21(4): 295-308
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-13461
Copyright © 2000 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS OF UNIVERSAL HEARING SCREENING

Betty R. Vohr1,4 , Peter Simon2 , Kristen Letourneau3
  • Brown University School of Medicine
  • 1Rhode Island Hearing Assessment
  • 2Rhode Island Department of Health, Program, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
  • 3Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
  • 4Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
31. Dezember 2000 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Universal newborn hearing screening is a preventive public health program in its developmental stages in the United States. Currently 28 states have legislation mandating universal hearing screening. The purpose of a newborn hearing screening program is early identification of a condition for which early intervention or treatment can lead to a reduction of morbidity or disabilities associated with the condition. Legislation that became effective in July 1993 mandated universal newborn hearing screening in Rhode Island. This article reviews the impact of child health policy and legislation in the state of Rhode Island on the development of an integrated system of hearing screening, identification, and intervention. It will also discuss the importance of linkages with key community and government players to facilitate a smooth seamless statewide system of services relative to the goals of universal newborn hearing screening.

KEYWORD

hearing screening - public health - legislation

REFERENCES

  • 1 American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Newborn and Infant Hearing. Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention.  Pediatrics . 1999;  133 527-529
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000. National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives Washington, DC: Public Health Service; 1990
  • 3 National Institutes of Health. NIH Consensus Statement. Vol 11. No. 1: Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children Bethesda, MD: NIH 1993: 1-24
  • 4 Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Position Statement.  ASHA . 1994;  36 38-41
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Position Statement.  Pediatrics . 2000;  106 798-817
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Mason J A, Herrmann K R. Universal infant hearing screening by automated auditory brainstem response measurement.  Pediatrics . 1998;  101 221-228
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Mehl A L, Thomson V. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission.  Pediatrics . 1998;  101 E4
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Finitzo T, Albright K, O'Neal J. The newborn with hearing loss: detection in the nursery.  J Pediatr . 1998;  102 1452-1460
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Kennedy C R. Controlled trial of universal neonatal screening for early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment: coverage, positive predictive value, effect on mothers and incremental yield. Wessex Universal Neonatal Screening Trial Group.  Acta Paediatr . 1999;  88(suppl) 73-75
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Vohr B R, Carty L M, Moore P E, Letourneau K. The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program: experience with statewide hearing screening (1993-1996).  J Pediatr . 1998;  133 353-357
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 White K R, Vohr B R, Behrens T R. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Results of the Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Project.  Semin Hear . 1993;  14 18-29
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kemp D T. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1978;  64 1386-1391
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey A L, Coulter D K, Mehl A L. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss.  Pediatrics . 1998;  102 1161-3371
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Yoshinaga-Itano C, Apuzzo M L. Identification of hearing loss after age 18 months is not early enough.  Am Ann Deaf . 1998;  143 380-387
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 White S J, White R EC. The effects of hearing status of the family and age of intervention on receptive and expressive oral language skills in hearing-impaired infants. In: Levitt H, McGarr NS, Geffner D, eds. Development of Language and Communication Skills in Hearing-Impaired Children ASHA Monog 26 1987: 9-24
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Apuzzo M L, Yoshinaga-Itano C. Early identification of infants with significant hearing loss and the Minnesota Child Development Inventory.  Semin Hear . 1995;  16 124-1371
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Moeller M P. Early intervention of hearing loss in children. Presented at the Fourth International Symposium on Childhood Deafness, October 9-13, 1996 Kiawah Island, SC
  • 18 Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Position Statement. ASHA; 1982 Mehl AL, Thomson V. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission. Pediatrics 1998;101(1).www:pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/101/e4.