Semin Hear 2000; 21(4): 367-378
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-13465
Copyright © 2000 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

TECHNIQUES FOR NEONATAL HEARING SCREENING

Mark E. Lutman
  • Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, United Kingdom
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
31. Dezember 2000 (online)

ABSTRACT

The aim of screening of hearing in neonates is to concentrate cases with material disorder into a manageable group that may be referred for more definitive diagnostic testing. Material disorder is defined as a permanent bilateral hearing impairment of at least 40 dB averaged over the frequencies 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. The two most common approaches involve automated auditory brain stem response (AABR) and transiently evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) techniques. Both techniques can achieve adequate specificity in excess of 95%. Provisional estimates of sensitivity suggest that 80 to 90% of cases will be correctly classified, which, although not ideal, is adequate for the purpose. Conventional AABR and TEOAE techniques do not provide frequency-specific threshold estimates. Implementation and validation of steady-state evoked potential (SSEP) and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) techniques may add this information. It is concluded that current techniques are fit for the purpose of effective neonatal hearing screening programs.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Probst R. Introduction to neonatal hearing screening. In: Proceedings of European Consensus Development Conference on Neonatal Hearing Screening, Milan, May 15-16, 1998 1998: 14-17
  • 2 Lutman M E, Grandori F. Screening for neonatal hearing defects. European consensus statement.  Eur J Pediatr . 1999;  158 95-96
  • 3 Bennett M J. Trials with the auditory response cradle. I. Neonatal responses to auditory stimuli.  Br J Audiol . 1979;  13 125-134
  • 4 Tucker S M, Bhattacharya J. Screening of hearing impairment in the newborn using the auditory response cradle.  Arch Dis Child . 1992;  67 911-919
  • 5 Rickards F W, Tan L E, Cohen L T. Auditory steady-state evoked potential in newborns.  Br J Audiol . 1994;  28 327-337
  • 6 Lins O G, Picton T W. Auditory steady state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli.  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol . 1995;  96 420-432
  • 7 Wong P KH, Bickford R G. Brain stem auditory evoked potentials: the use of noise estimates.  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol . 1980;  50 25-34
  • 8 Don M, Elberling C. Evaluating residual background noise in human auditory brain-stem presponses.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1984;  96 2746-2757
  • 9 Mason S M. On-line computer scoring of the auditory brainstem response for estimation of hearing threshold.  Audiology . 1984;  23 277-296
  • 10 Hatzopoulos S, Tsakanikos M, Grzanka A. Comparison of neonatal transient evoked otoacoustic emission responses recorded with linear and QuickScreen protocols.  Audiology . 2000;  39 70-79
  • 11 Rasmussen A N, Osterhammel P A, Johannesen P T, Borgkvist B. Neonatal hearing screening using otoacoustic emissions elicited by maximum length sequences.  Br J Audiol . 1998;  32 355-366
  • 12 Whitehead M L, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbit. I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1992;  91 1587-1606
  • 13 Dirckx J J, Daemers K, Somers T. Numerical assessment of TOAE screening results: currently used criteria and their effect on TOAE prevalence figures.  Acta Otolaryngol . 1996;  116 672-679
  • 14 Buller G, Lutman M E. Automatic classification of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions using an artificial neural network.  Br J Audiol . 1998;  32 235-247
  • 16 Rance G, Beer D A, Cone-Wesson B. Clinical findings for a group of infants and young children with auditory neuropathy.  Ear Hear . 1999;  20 238-252
  • 17 Coats A C, Martin J L. Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses.  Arch Otolaryngol . 1977;  103 605-622
  • 18 Davis A, Bamford J, Wilson I. A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment.  Health Technol Assess . 1997;  1(10) 1-177
  • 19 Davis A. Performance of neonatal and infant hearing screens: Sensitivity and specificity. In: Proceedings of European Consensus Development Conference on Neonatal Hearing Screening Milan, May 15-16, 1998: 40-50