Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2000; 21(8): 593-597
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-8488
Training and Testing
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ·New York

Effect of Recovery Interventions on Lactate Removal and Subsequent Performance

J. Monedero,  B. Donne
  • Department of Physiology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

The recovery process in sport plays an essential role in determining subsequent athletic performance. This study investigated the effectiveness of different recovery interventions after maximal exercise. Eighteen trained male cyclists initially undertook an incremental test to determine maximal oxygen consumption. The four recovery interventions tested were: passive, active (50 % maximal oxygen uptake), massage, and combined (involving active and massage components). All test sessions were separated by 2 to 3 days. During intervention trials subjects performed two simulated 5 km maximal effort cycling tests (T1 and T2) separated by a 20 min recovery. Performance time for the tests (t1, t2); blood lactate (BLa) during T1, T2, and every 3 min during recovery; and heart rate (HR) during the recovery intervention and T2 were recorded. Combined recovery was found to be better than passive (P < 0.01) and either active or massage (P < 0.05) in maintenance of performance time during T2. Active recovery was the most effective intervention for removing BLa at minutes 9 and 12, BLa removal during combined recovery was significantly better than passive at minute 3, and significantly better than passive, active, and massage at minute 15. In conclusion, combined recovery was the most efficient intervention for maintaining maximal performance time during T2, and active recovery was the best intervention for removing BLa.

Key words:

Fatigue, blood lactate, massage.

References

  • 1 Ahmaidi S, Granier P, Taoutaou Z. Effect of active recovery on plasma lactate and anaerobic power following repeated intensive exercise.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996;  28 450-456
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Astrand P O, Hallback I, Hedman R, Saltin B. Blood lactates after prolonged severe exercise.  J Appl Physiol. 1963;  18 619-622
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Astrand P O, Hultman E, Juhlin-Dannfelt A, Reynolds G. Disposal of lactate during and after strenuous exercise in humans.  J Appl Physiol. 1986;  6 338-343
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bond V, Adams R G, Tearney R J, Gresham K, Ruff W. Effects of active and passive recovery on lactate removal and subsequent isokinetic muscle function.  J Sports Med Phys Fit. 1991;  31 357-361
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Choi D, Cole K J, Goodpaster B H. Effect of passive and active recovery on the resynthesis of muscle glycogen.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;  26 992-996
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dodd S, Powers S K, Callender T, Brooks E. Blood lactate disappearance at various intensities of recovery exercise.  J Appl Physiol. 1984;  57 1462-1465
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gisolfi C, Robinson S, Turrell E S. Effects of aerobic work performed during recovery from exhausting work.  J Appl Physiol. 1966;  21 1767-1772
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gupta S, Goswami A, Sadhukhan A K, Mathur D N. Comparative study of lactate removal in short term massage of extremities, active recovery and a passive recovery period after supramaximal exercise sessions.  Int J Sports Med. 1996;  17 106-110
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hermansen L, Stensvold I. Production and removal of lactate during exercise in man.  Acta Physiol Scand. 1972;  86 191-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hermansen L, Osnes J. Blood and muscle pH after maximal exercise in man.  J Appl Physiol. 1972;  32 304-308
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Jorfeldt L, Juhlin-Dannfelt A, Karlsson J. Lactate release in relation to tissue lactate in human skeletal muscle during exercise.  J Appl Physiol. 1978;  44 350-352
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Karlsson J. Lactate and phosphagen concentration in working muscle of man. Acta Physiol Scand 1970 - 1971: 358
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Peters Futre E M, Noakes T D, Raine R I, Terblanche S E. Muscle glycogen repletion during active postexercise recovery.  Am J Physiol. 1987;  253 305-311
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Stamford B A, Weltman A, Moffat R, Sady S. Exercise recovery above and below anaerobic threshold following maximal work.  J Appl Physiol. 1981;  51 840-844
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Thiriet P, Gozal D, Wouassi D, Oumarou T, Gelas H, Lacour J R. The effect of various recovery modalities on subsequent performance, in consecutive supramaximal exercise.  J Sports Med Phys Fit. 1993;  33 118-129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Weltman A, Stamford B A, Moffat R J, Katch V L. Exercise recovery, lactate removal, and subsequent high intensity exercise performance.  Res Q. 1977;  48 786-796
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Weltman A, Stamford B A, Fulco C. Recovery from maximal effort exercise: lactate disappearance and subsequent performance.  J Appl Physiol. 1979;  47 677-682
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

B. Donne

Physiology Department Trinity College Dublin

Dublin 2 Republic of Ireland

Phone: Phone:+ 353 (1) 608-2012/1390

Fax: Fax.+ 353 (1) 6790119

Email: E-mail:bdonne@mail.tcd.ie