Although peptic ulcer continues to be the commonest cause of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, obscure haemorrhage from the Dieulafoy malformation and haemobilia must be considered, and may be amenable to endoscopic therapy. The patients who are at the highest risk of rebleeding and death are elderly, in shock at presentation, and have major stigmata of recent haemorrhage (SRH). The endoscopist must identify SRH, and identification may be made easier by washing the area with hydrogen peroxide. The natural history of SRH has been defined. There is wide interobserver variation in the interpretation of SRH, and there is probably therefore little value in the endoscopist describing subtle appearances. Although the value of endoscopic haemostatic therapy is established, it has still not been taken up by all institutions.
Endoscopic injection of fibrin glue into the bleeding ulcer is a logical and relatively easy approach, and a systematic histological study of resected ulcers has shown that this does not adversely affect the ulcer healing process. Thermal therapies such as argon plasma coagulation and the heater probe have comparable efficacy. Although a combination of injection and thermal treatments may be logical, there are only trends suggesting that this is better than monotherapy. Nevertheless, the gold probe continues to be used in clinical practice. Experiments in an animal model of gastric bleeding suggest that the gold probe is effective, and that the version with a wide-gauge needle is best. Haemoclips may stop acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding from a range of sources.
Patients who rebleed after initial endoscopic haemostasis have a tenfold increase in the risk of death. An important study from Hong Kong suggests that repeat endoscopic treatment after rebleeding has comparable morbidity and mortality to a policy of urgent surgery without endoscopic repeat intervention.
References (Key References are highlighted)
1
Dinu F, Devière J, Van Gossum A, et al.
The wirsungorrhagies: causes and management in 14 patients.
Endoscopy.
1998;
30
595-600
2
Rockey DC, Koch J, Cello JP, et al.
Relative frequency of upper gastrointestinal and colonic lesions in patients with positive fecal occult blood tests.
N Engl J Med.
1998;
339
153-159
9
Cooper GS, Chak A, Way LE, et al.
Early endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: associations with recurrent bleeding, surgery, and length of hospital stay.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
49
145-152
10
Bornman PC, Theodorou N, Shuttleworth RD, et al.
Importance of hypovolaemic shock and endoscopic signs in predicting recurrent haemorrhage from peptic ulceration: a prospective evaluation.
Br Med J.
1985;
291
245-247
11
Lau JY, Chung SC, Leung JW, et al.
The evolution of hemorrhage in bleeding peptic ulcers: a sequential endoscopic study.
Endoscopy.
1998;
30
513-518
12
Wu DC, Lu CY, Lu CH, et al.
Endoscopic hydrogen peroxide spray may facilitate localization of the bleeding site in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Endoscopy.
1999;
31
237-241
13
Mondardini A, Barletti C, Rocca G, et al.
Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and Forrest's classification: diagnostic agreement between endoscopists from the same area.
Endoscopy.
1998;
30
508-512
17
Gralnek M, Jensen DM, Gorbein J, et al.
Clinical and economic outcomes of individuals with severe peptic ulcer hemorrhage and nonbleeding visible vessel: an analysis of two prospective clinical trials.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1998;
93
2047-2053
18
Cooper CS, Chak A, Way LE, et al.
Endoscopic practice for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: differences between major teaching and communitybased hospitals.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1998;
48
348-353
19
Rutgeerts P, Rauws E, Wara P, et al.
Randomised trial of single and repeated fibrin glue compared with injection of polidocanol in treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer.
Lancet.
1997;
350
692-696
22
Messmann H, Schaller P, Andus T, et al.
Effect of programmed endoscopic followup examinations on the rebleeding rate of gastric or duodenal peptic ulcers treated by injection therapy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Endoscopy.
1998;
30
583-589
24
Choudari CP, Rajgopal C, Elton RA, Palmer KR.
Failures of endoscopic therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers: an analysis of risk factors.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1994;
89
1968-1972
25
Cipolletta L, Bianco MA, Rotandano G, et al.
Prospective comparison of argon plasma coagulator and heater probe in the endoscopic treatment of major peptic ulcer bleeding.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1998;
48
191-195
26
Chung SCS, Lau JL, Sung JJ.
Randomised comparison between adrenaline injection alone and adrenaline injection plus heater probe treatment for actively bleeding peptic ulcers.
Br Med J.
1997;
314
1307-1311
28
Chung IK, Ham JS, Kim HS.
Comparison of the hemostatic efficacy of the endoscopic hemoclip method with hypertonic saline-epinephrine injection and a combination of the two for the management of bleeding peptic ulcers.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
49
13-18
31
Lau JY, Sung JJ, Lam YH, et al.
Endoscopic retreatment compared with surgery in patients with recurrent bleeding after initial endoscopic control of bleeding ulcers.
N Engl J Med.
1999;
340
751-756