Zusammenfassung.
Aufgrund der extrem hohen Anforderungen an die Bildqualität in der Mammographie gab es lange Zeit keine adäquate digitale Alternative zur konventionellen Film-Folien-Mammographie. Die längste Erfahrung existiert bisher mit der digitalen Mammographie auf Speicherfolienbasis. Diese Technik weist jedoch bei normaler Dosis ein relativ schlechtes Signal-zu-Rausch-Verhältnis auf und konnte sich nicht allgemein durchsetzen. Seit kurzem befinden sich drei neuartige Systeme zur digitalen Vollfeldmammographie von den Firmen Fischer (Schlitzdetektor), Trex (CCD-Mosaik) und GE (amorpher Silizium Detektor) in der klinischen Erprobung.
Der entscheidende Vorteil der digitalen Mammographie ist die lineare Beziehung zwischen Dosis und Detektorsignal und die damit verbundene Möglichkeit der gezielten Optimierung des Bildkontrastes. Darüber hinaus eröffnet sich durch die digitale Mammographie eine Reihe weiterer Möglichkeiten wie digitale Bildspeicherung, Telemammographie und computer-assistierte Diagnose.
Full-field digital mammography.
Due to the extremely high image quality requirements in mammography, there has for a long time been no adequate digital alternative to conventional film-screen mammography. The longest experience so far exists with digital mammography on the basis of storage phosphor (CR) systems. However, at normal dose this technique has a relatively poor signal-to-noise ratio and has not found general acceptance. Recently three novel systems for digital mammography by the companies Fischer (slot-scan detector), Trex (CCD-array), and GE (amorphous silicon detector) have been introduced and are currently under clinical investigation.
The main advantage of digital mammography is the linear relationship between dose and detector signal with the possibility of a tailored optimization of image contrast. Other advantages include digital image storage, telemammography, and computer-assisted diagnosis.
Schlüsselwörter:
Digitale Mammographie - Mammakarzinom - Früherkennung - PACS - Computer-assistierte Diagnose
Key words:
Digital Mammography - Breast Cancer - Screening - PACS - Computer-assisted Diagnosis
Literatur
-
1
Inamura K, Takahashi T.
Storage and presentation of images.
Int J Biomed Comput.
1995;
39
157-162
-
2
Lindhardt F E.
Clinical experiences with computed radiography.
Eur Radiol.
1996;
22
175-185
-
3
Bauman R A, Gell G, Dwyer S J3rd.
Large picture archiving and communication systems of the world - Part 1.
J Digit Imaging.
1996;
9
99-103
-
4
Pisano E D.
Current status of full-field digital mammography.
Radiology.
2000;
214
26-28
-
5
Feig S A, Yaffe M J.
Current status of digital mammography.
Semin Ultrasound CT MR.
1996;
17
424-443
-
6
Williams M B, Fajardo L L.
Digital mammography: performance considerations and current detector designs.
Acad Radiol.
1996;
3
429-437
-
7 Critten J P, Emde K A, Mawdsley G E, Yaffe M J. Digital mammography image correction and evaluation. In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA (eds) Digital Mammography '96. Amsterdam; Elsevier Science 1996: 455-458
-
8
Chan H-P, Vyborny C J, MacMahon H, Metz C E, Doi K, Sickles E A.
Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
Invest Radiol.
1987;
22
581-589
-
9
Feig S A, Yaffe M J.
Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
Radiol Clin North Am.
1995;
33
(6)
1205-1230
-
10
Rosol M S, Niklason L T, Venkatakrishan V, Silvenoinnen H, Kopans D B, Hamberg L M.
Contrast-detail comparison of a full-field digital mammography system and a screen-film system.
Radiology.
1999;
213P
151
-
11
Diekmann F, Bick U, Grebe S D, Marth F, Juran R, Friedrich M, Hamm B.
Contrast-detail resolution of full-field digital mammography in comparison with conventional film-screen mammography.
Eur Radiol.
2000;
10
(1)
117
-
12
Gingold E L, Wu X, Barnes G T.
Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography.
Radiology.
1995;
195
639-644
-
13
Nab H W, Karssemeijer N, van Erning L JTHO, Hendriks J HCL.
Comparison of digital and conventional mammograph: a ROC study of 270 mammograms.
Med Inform.
1992;
17
125-131
-
14
Karssemeijer N, Frieling J TM, Hendriks J HCL.
Spatial resolution in digital mammography.
Invest Radiol.
1993;
28
413-419
-
15
Bick U, Diekmann F, Grebe S D, Hamm B.
Full-field digital mammography: first clinical experiences.
Eur Radiol.
2000;
10
(1)
116
-
16
Cowen A R, Parkin G JS, Hawkridge P.
Direct digital mammography image acquisition.
Eur Radiol.
1997;
7
918-930
-
17
Jarlman O, Samuelsson L, Braw M.
Digital luminescence mammography. Early clinical experience.
Acta Radiol.
1991;
32
110-113
-
18
Nawano S.
Evaluation of digital mammography in diagnosis of breast cancer.
J Digit Imaging.
1995;
8
67
-
19
Brettle D S, Ward S C, Parkin G JS, Cowen A R, Sumsion H J.
A clinical comparison between conventional and digital mammography utilizing computed radiography.
Br J Radiol.
1994;
67
464-468
-
20
Schönhofen H, Arnold W, Hess T, Allgayer B.
Digitale Mammographie: Erfahrungen bei klinischer Anwendung.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
1998;
169
45-52
-
21
Higashida Y, Moribe N, Morita K, Katsuda N, Hatemura M, Takada T, Takahashi M, Yamashita J.
Detection of subtle microcalcifications: comparison of computed radiography and screen-film mammography.
Radiology.
1992;
183
483-486
-
22
Kheddache S, Thilander-Klang A, Lanhede B, Mansson L G, Bjurstam N, Ackerholm P, Björneld L.
Storage phosphor and film-screen mammography: performance with different mammographic techniques.
Eur Radiol.
1999;
9
591-597
-
23
Oestmann J W, Kopans D, Hall D A, McCarthy K A, Rubens J R, Greene R.
A comparison of digitized storage phosphors and conventional mammogrpahy in the detection of malignant microcalcifications.
Invest Radiol.
1988;
23
725-728
-
24
Yaffe M J, Rowlands J A.
X-ray detectors for digital radiography.
Phys Med Biol.
1997;
42
1-39
-
25
Yaffe M J.
Direct digital mammography using a scanned-slot CCD imaging system.
Med Prog Technol.
1993;
19
13-21
-
26 Feig S A, Yaffe M J, Plewes D B, Maidment A DA, Piccaro M F, Tesic M, Mawdsley G E, Critten J P. Clinical evaluation of a scanned-slot, full-field digital mammography system. In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA (eds) Digital Mammography '96. Amsterdam; Elsevier Science 1996: 71-79
-
27
Nishikawa R M, Mawdsley G E, Fenster A, Yaffe M J.
Scanned-projection digital mammography.
Med Phys.
1987;
14
717-727
-
28
Boyle E R, Pak D, Williams J B.
Motion artifact seen on slot-scanning direct digital mammography.
Am J Roentgenol.
1999;
172
697-701
-
29
Jalink A, McAdoo J, Halama G, Liu H.
CCD mosaic technique for large area mammography.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging.
1996;
15
260-267
-
30 Cheung L, Bird R, Chitkara A, Rego A, Rodriguez C, Yuen J. Initial operating and clinical results of a full field mammography system. In: Karssemeijer N, Thijssen M, Hemdriks J, van Erning L (eds) Digital Mammography. Dordrecht; Kluwer 1998: 11-18
-
31
Muller S.
Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system.
Eur J Radiol.
1999;
31
25-34
-
32
Rowlands J A, Hunter D M, Araj N.
X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: detective quantum efficiency of photoconductive receptors for digital mammography.
Med Phys.
1991;
18
421-431
-
33
Fahrig R, Rowlands J A, Yaffe M J.
X-ray imaging with amorphous selenium: detective quantum efficiency of photoconductive receptors for digital mammography.
Med Phys.
1995;
22
153-160
-
34
Lewin J M.
Full-field digital mammography.
Diagnostic Imaging.
1999;
September
40-45
-
35
Funke M, Netsch T, Breiter N, Biehl M, Peitgen H O, Grabbe E.
Computergestützte Visualisierung digitaler Mammogramme.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
1999;
171
359-363
-
36
Shile P E, Ramanurthy V.
Performance issues in the softcopy display of mammograms.
Radiology.
1999;
213P
151
-
37
Blume H, Roehrig H, Browne M, Ji T L.
Comparison of the physical performance of high resolution CRT displays and films recorded by laser image printers and displayed on light-boxes and the need for a display standard.
Proc SPIE.
1990;
1232
97-114
-
38
Maitz G S, Chang T S, Sumkin J H, Wintz P W, Johns C M, Gannott M, Holbert B L, Hakim C M, Harris K M, Gur D, Herron J M.
Preliminary clinical evaluation of a high-resolution telemammography system.
Invest Radiol.
1997;
32
236-240
-
39
Thurfjell E L, Lernevall K A, Taube A AS.
Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program.
Radiology.
1994;
191
241-244
-
40
Pisano E D, Chandramouli J, Hemminger B M, Johnston R E, Muller K, Pizer S.
The effect of intensity windowing on the detection of simulated masses embedded in dense portions of digitized mammograms in a laboratory setting.
J Digit Imaging.
1997;
10
174-182
-
41
Pisano E D, Chandramouli J, Hemminger B M, DeLuca M, Glueck D, Johnston R E, Muller K, Braeuning M P, Pizer S.
Does intensity windowing improve the detection of simulated calcifications in dense mammograms?.
J Digit Imaging.
1997;
10
79-84
-
42
Metz C E, Chan H-P, Doi K, Shen J-H.
Contrast enhancement of noisy images by windowing: Limitations due to the finite dynamic range of the display system.
Med Phys.
1989;
16
170-178
-
43
Pisano E D, Zong S, Hemmiger B M, DeLuca M, Johnston R E, Muller K, Braeuning M P, Pizer S.
Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms.
J Digit Imaging.
1998;
11
193-200
-
44
Bick U, Giger M L, Schmidt R A, Nishikawa R M, Wolverton D E, Doi K.
Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms.
Acad Radiol.
1995;
2
1-9
-
45
Bick U, Giger M L, Schmidt R A, Nishikawa R M, Doi K.
Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms.
Radiographics.
1996;
16
1403-1411
-
46
Byng J W, Critten J P, Yaffe M J.
Thickness-equalization processing for mammographic images.
Radiology.
1997;
203
564-568
-
47
Bick U.
Computerassistierte Diagnose in der Screeningmammographie.
Radiologe.
1996;
36
72-80
-
48
Karssemeijer N, Hendriks J HCL.
Computer-assisted reading of mammograms.
Eur Radiol.
1997;
7
743-748
-
49
Nawano S, Murakami K, Moriyama N, Kobatake H, Takeo H, Shimura K.
Computer-aided diagnosis in full digital mammography.
Invest Radiol.
1999;
34
310-316
-
50
Nishikawa R M, Giger M L, Yarusso L M, Kupinski M A, Baehr A E, Venta L A, et al.
Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of images obtained on full-field digital mammography.
Radiology.
1999;
213P
229
Priv. Doz. Dr. med. Ulrich Bick
Associate Professor of Radiology Department of Radiology MC 2026 The University of Chicago
5841 South Maryland Avenue
Chicago, IL 60637
USA
Phone: + 1-773-702-6200
Fax: + 1-773-702-1161
Email: u-bick@uchicago.edu
