Download PDF
Skull Base 2000; Volume 10(Number 03): 141-148
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-9510
Copyright © 2000 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Hearing Preservation after Acoustic Neuroma Surgery

Vikram J. Jaisinghani, Samuel C. Levine, Eric Nussbaum, Stephen Haines, Bruce Lindgren
  • Department of Otolaryngology (VJJ), Department of Otolaryngology (SCL), Department of Neurosurgery (EN, SH), School of Public Health (BL), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Minnesota
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Acoustic neuromas (AN) are benign tumors that arise from the vestibular nerve within the internal auditory canal, where hearing loss is the most common symptom. This retrospective study was done to determine the results of hearing preservation in patients operated for AN at the University of Minnesota, as well as the factors affecting them. One hundred-eighty patients with AN were operated between 1988 and 1998, of whom 91 (50.5%) underwent hearing preservation surgery by either the middle fossa (MF) or the suboccipital (SO) approach. Preoperative and postoperative pure-tone averages (1, 2, and 4 K), speech discrimination scores (SDS), and acoustic reflex thresholds (ART) were noted and classified according to the Shelton's and the Gardner's classifications. The overall rate of hearing preservation was 23.1%. The outcome of hearing results was better with the MF approach compared with the SO approach. Small tumor size and better preoperative hearing levels favored a better postoperative hearing result. The rate of hearing improvement over time was better for the MF patients. Patients for whom intraoperative auditory monitoring was performed seemed to have better hearing outcomes.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Dornhoffer J L, Helms J, Hoehmann D H. Hearing preservation in acoustic tumor surgery: Results and prognostic factors.  Laryngoscope . 1995;  105 185-187
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Tos M, Thomsen J. Proposal of classification in Acoustic Neuroma surgery. In: Tos M, Thomsen J, eds. Acoustic Neuroma Proceedings of the First International Conference on Acoustic Neuroma, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 1991. Amsterdam Kugler, 1992: 133-137
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Elliot F A, McKissock W. Acoustic neuroma: Early diagnosis.  Lancet . 1954;  2 1189-1191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 House W F. Surgical exposure of the internal auditory canal and its contents through the middle cranial fossa.  Laryngoscope . 1961;  71 1363-1385
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jannetta P J, Møller A R, Møller M B. Technique of hearing preservation in small acoustic neuromas.  Ann Surg . 1984;  200 513-523
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ojemann R G, Levine R A, Montgomery W M. Use of intraoperative auditory evoked potentials to preserve hearing in unilateral acoustic neuroma removal.  J Neurosurg . 1984;  61 938-948
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bess F H, Lichtenstein M J, Logan S A, Burger M C, Nelson E. Hearing impairment as a determinant of function in the elderly.  J Am Geriatr Soc . 1989;  37 123-128
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Weigand D A, Fickel V. Acoustic neuroma-the patients perspective: Subjective assessment of symptoms, diagnosis, therapy, and outcome in 541 patients.  Laryngoscope . 1989;  99 179-187
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gardner G, Robertson J H. Hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol . 1988;  97 55-66
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Glasscock III M E, Hays J W, Minor Z B, Haynes D S, Carrasco V N. Preservation of hearing in surgery for acoustic neuromas.  J Neurosurg . 1993;  78 864-870
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cohen N L, Hammersclag P, Berg H. Acoustic neuroma surgery: an eclectic approach with emphasis on preservation of hearing-the New York-Bellevue experience.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol . 1986;  95 21-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Frerebeau P, Benezech J, Uziel A. Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma operation.  Neurosurgery . 1987;  21 197-200
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nedzelski J M, Chiong C M, Cashman M Z, Stanton S G, Rowed D W. Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery: value of monitoring cochlear nerve action potentials.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1994;  111 703-709
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Hoehmann D. Pre and postoperative hearing thresholds and brainstem responses in patients with acoustic neuroma: Follow up study using the middle fossa approach.  Am J Otol . 1991;  12 172-178
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Shelton C, Brackmann D E, House H F. Middle fossa acoustic tumor surgery: Results in 106 cases.  Laryngoscope . 1989;  99 405-408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gantz B J, Parnes L S, Harker L A. Middle cranial fossa acoustic neuroma excision: results and complications.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol . 1986;  95 454-459
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Glasscock III M E, McKennan K X, Levine S C. Acoustic neuroma surgery: The results of hearing conservation surgery.  Laryngoscope . 1987;  97 785-789
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Silverstein H, McDaniel A B, Norrell H. Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma surgery using intraoperative direct eighth cranial nerve monitoring.  Am J Otol . 1985;  6(suppl) 99-106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Harner S G, Laws Jr E R, Onofrio B M. Hearing preservation after removal of acoustic neurinomas.  Laryngoscope . 1984;  94 1431-1434
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Shelton C, Brackmann D E, House W F. Acoustic tumor surgery: Prognostic factors in hearing conservation.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1989;  115 1212-1216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nadol J B, Chiong C M, Ojemann R G. Preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in resection of acoustic neuroma.  Laryngoscope . 1992;  102 1153-1158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Fischer G, Costantini J L, Mercier P. Improvement of hearing after microsurgical removal of acoustic neurinoma.  Neurosurgery . 1980;  7 154-159
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Samii M, Turel K E, Penkert G. Management of seventh and eighth nerve involvement by cerebellopontine angle tumors.  Clin Neurosurg . 1985;  32 242-272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rowed D W, Nedzelski J M. Hearing preservation in the removal of intracanalicular acoustic neuromas via the retrosigmoid approach.  J Neurosurg . 1997;  86 456-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Nadol J B, Levine R, Martuza R J, Ojemann R G, Montgomery W W. Preservation of hearing in surgical removal of acoustic neuromas in the internal auditory canal and cerebellar pontine angle.  Laryngoscope . 1987;  97 1287-1294
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Fischer G, Fischer C, Remond J. Pre- and intraoperative indicators for hearing preservation in suboccipital surgery. In: Tos M, Thomsen J, eds. Acoustic Neuroma Proceedings of the First International Conference on Acoustic Neuroma, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 1991 Amsterdam: Kugler, 1992: 531-535
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Kveton J F, Book J. A comparison of auditory nerve monitoring techniques in acoustic tumor surgery. In: Tos M, Thomsen J, eds. Acoustic Neuroma Proceedings of the First International Conference on Acoustic Neuroma, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 1991 Amsterdam: Kugler, 1992: 537-542
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Maniglia A J, Fenstermaker R A, Ratcheson P A. Preservation of hearing in the surgical removal of cerebellopontine angle tumors.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am . 1989;  22 211-232
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Prass R L, Kinney S E, Luders H. Transtragal, transtympanic electrode placement for intraoperative electrocochleographic monitoring.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1989;  97 343-350
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Symon L, Sabin H, Bentivoglio P. Intraoperative monitoring of the electrocochleogram and the preservation of hearing during acoustic neuroma excision.  Acta Neurochir (Wein) . 1988;  42(suppl) 27-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar