Download PDF
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2000; 60(6): 314-319
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-9557
Originalarbeit

Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Nervenschonende radikale Hysterektomie I. Anatomische Grundlagen und Operationstechnik

Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: I. Anatomical Principles and Surgical TechniqueM. Höckel 1 , W. Wolff 2 , W. Schmidt 2 , K. Spanel-Borowski 2
  • 1 Universitätsfrauenklinik Leipzig
  • 2 Institut für Anatomie der Universität Leipzig
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Fragestellung

Fragestellung: Kann der therapeutische Index bei der operativen Behandlung des Zervixkarzinoms verbessert werden?

Methodik

Methodik: Liposuction-assistierte Untersuchungen der topographischen Neuroanatomie im Becken weiblicher Körperspender bildeten die Grundlage für die Entwicklung der nervenschonenden radikalen Hysterektomie [11].

Ergebnisse

Ergebnisse: Die nervenschonende radikale Hysterektomietechnik unterscheidet sich von der traditionellen Wertheim-Meigs-Operation durch: 1. Resektion von zusätzlichem Risikogewebe, insbesondere im inferioren posterioren Parametrium sowie lateral und dorsal der großen Beckengefäße; 2. Reduktion des Gewebetraumas durch Präparation in durch die Embryonalentwicklung vorgegebenen Ebenen; 3. Darstellen und Schonen wesentlicher Anteile des autonomen Beckennervensystems.

Schlussfolgerung

Schlussfolgerung: Die Umsetzung neuer anatomischer und tumorbiologischer Erkenntnisse in die Technik der nervenschonenden radikalen Hysterektomie eröffnet eine Möglichkeit, die operative Behandlung des Zervixkarzinoms zu verbessern.

Abstract

Objective

Objective: To improve the therapeutic index of the surgical treatment of cervical cancer.

Methods

Methods: The technique of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was developed based on liposuction-assisted neuroanatomical studies of the female pelvis.

Results

Results: Compared with conventional radical hysterectomy, the nerve-sparing procedure permitted the resection of more parametrial tissue, particularly in the inferior and posterior parametrium as well as lateral to and behind the major vessels. Tissue trauma was reduced by dissection along embryologically preformed planes. Major portions of the autonomic pelvic nerve supply were dissected out and preserved.

Conclusions

Conclusions: The application of new anatomical and tumor biological findings in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy may improve the surgical treatment of cervical cancer.

Literatur

  • 1 Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Scambia G, Greggi S, Cutillo G, D'Andrea G, Rabitti C, Coronetta F, Capelli A, Mancuso S. Lymphatic spread of cervical cancer: An anatomical and pathological study based on 225 radical hysterectomies with systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy.  Gynecol Oncol. 1996;  62 19-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bergmark K, Avall-Lundqvist E, Dickman P W, Henningsohn L, Steineck G. Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer.  N Engl J Med. 1999;  340 1383-1389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Burghardt E, Baltzer J, Tulusan A H, Haas J. Results of surgical treatment of 1028 cervical cancers studied with volumetry.  Cancer. 1992;  70 648-655
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Burghardt E. Radicality in gynecologic cancer surgery: A historical perspective.  Gynecol Oncol. 1998;  70 172-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Dargent D, Brun J L, Roy M, Methevet P, Remy I. La trachélectomie élargie (TE). Une alternative à l'hystérectomie radicale dans le traitement des cancers infiltrants développés sur la face externe du col utérin.  JobGyn. 1994;  2 285-292
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dargent D, Mathevet P. Schauta's vaginal hysterectomy combined with laparoscopic lymhadenectomy.  Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;  9 105-109
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fotiou S, Tserkezoglou A, Hatzieleftheriou G, Apostolikas N. Class III vs class II radical hysterectomy in stage IB cervical carcinoma: a comparison of morbidity and survival.  Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1997;  7 117-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Friedberg V. Operative therapy for stage IIB cervical cancer.  Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;  2 973-980
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Girardi F, Pickel H, Winter R. Pelvic and parametrial lymph nodes in the quality control of the surgical treatment of cervical cancer.  Gynecol Oncol. 1993;  50 330-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Höckel M, Schlenger K, Hamm H, Knapstein P G, Hohenfellner R, Rösler H P. Five-year experience with combined operative and radiotherapeutic treatment of recurrent gynecologic tumors infiltrating the pelvic wall.  Cancer. 1996;  77 1918-1933
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Höckel M, Konerding M A, Heußel C P. Liposuction-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hysterectomy: Oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  178 971-976
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Höckel M. Laterally extended endopelvic resection: Surgical treatment of infrailiac pelvic wall recurrences of gynecologic malignancies.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;  180 306-312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Höckel M. Pelvic recurrences of cervical cancer. Relapse pattern, prognostic factors, and the role of extended radical treatment.  J Pelvic Surg. 1999;  5 255-266
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kadar N, Salbia N, Nelson J H. The frequency, causes and prevention of severe urinary dysfunction after radical hysterectomy.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983;  90 858-863
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lahousen M, Haas J, Pickel H, Hackl A, Kurz C, Ogris H, Stummvoll W, Winter R. Chemotherapy versus radiotherapy versus observation for high-risk cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy: A randomized, prospective, multicenter trial.  Gynecol Oncol. 1999;  73 196-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lin H H, Cheng W F, Chan K WA, Chang D Y, Chen C K, Huang S C. Risk factors for recurrence in patients with stage IB, IIA and IIB cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy and postoperative pelvic irradiation.  Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  88 274-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Magrina J F, Goodrich M A, Lidner T K, Weaver A L, Cornella J L, Podratz K C. Modified radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early squamous cervical cancer.  Gynecol Oncol. 1999;  72 183-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Manzl J, Marberger F, Hetzel H, Klammer J, Geir W, Dapunt O. Funktionelle Störungen des unteren Harntraktes nach Radikaloperation des Kollumkarzinoms.  Geburtsh u Frauenheilk. 1981;  41 145-150
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Meigs J V. Carcinoma of the cervix: the Wertheim operation.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1944;  78 195-198
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Nezhat C R, Burrell M O, Nezhat F R, Benigno B B, Welander C E. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;  166 864-865
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Okabayashi H. Radical abdominal hysterectomy for cancer of the cervix uteri.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1921;  33 335-341
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Petri E. Bladder dysfunction after intraabdominal or vaginal surgery. Ostergard DR, Bent AE Urogynecology and Urodynamics. Baltimore; Williams & Williams 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Piver M S, Rutledge F, Smith J P. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer.  Obstet Gynecol. 1974;  44 265-272
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Possover M, Krause N, Kuhne-Heid R, Schneider A. Laparoscopic assistance for extended radicality of radical vaginal hysterectomy: description of a technique.  Gynecol Oncol. 1998;  70 94-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sardi J, Sananes C, Giaroli A, Bayo J, Gomes Rueda N, Vighi S. Results of a prospective randomized trial with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB, bulky, squamous carcinoma of the cervix.  Gynecol Oncol. 1993;  49 156-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Sardi J E, Sananes C E, Giaroli A A, Bermúdez A, Ferreira M H, Soderini A H, Snaidas L, Guardado N, Anchezar P, Contreras Ortiz O, DiPaola G R. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical carcinoma stage IIB. a randomized controlled trial.  Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1998;  8 441-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Sartori E, Fallo L, LaFace B, Bianchi U A, Pecorelli S. Extended radical hysterectomy in early-stage carcinoma of the uterine cervix: tailoring the radicality.  Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1995;  5 143-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Schneider A, Possover M, Kamprath S, Endisch U, Krause N, Noschel H. Laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy modified according to Schauta-Stoeckel.  Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  88 1057-1060
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sedlis A, Bundy B N, Rotman M Z, Lentz S S, Muderspach L I, Zaino R J. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A gynecologic oncology group study.  Gynecol Oncol. 1999;  73 177-183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Sekido N, Kaeai K, Akaza H. Lower urinary tract dysfunction as persistent complication of radical hysterectomy.  Int J Urol. 1997;  4 259-264
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Thiel W. Die Konservierung ganzer Leichen in natürlichen Farben.  Ann Anat. 1992;  174 185-195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Wertheim E. The extended abdominal operation for carcinoma uteri (based on 500 operative cases).  Am J Obstet Dis Women Child. 1912;  66 169-232
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. Michael Höckel

Universitätsfrauenklinik

Philipp-Rosenthal-Strasse 55

04103 Leipzig