Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol 2001; 18(1): 003-010
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-12839
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Renal Arteries

Charles M. Heaton, Joshua M. Farber
  • Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2001 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) represents an important tool in the diagnosis of many vascular processes involving the kidneys. This article reviews the indications for MRA of the renal arteries and the results presented in the literature regarding MRA for renal artery stenosis, variant anatomy, renal masses, and renal transplants. In addition, the techniques currently used for MRA of the renal arteries are outlined.

KEYWORD

Magnetic resonance angiography - vascular studies - kidney - magnetic resonance - MR

REFERENCES

  • 1 Silverman J, Friedman M, Van Allan R. Detection of main renal artery stenosis using phase-contrast cine MR angiography.  AJR Am J Roentgenol . 1996;  166 1131-1137
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Schwartz G L. Hypertension. In: Prakash U, ed. Mayo Clinic Internal Medicine Board Review 1998-1999 Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins 1998: 477-480
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Smyth S. Renovascular hypertension. In: Taveras J, Ferrucci J, eds. Radiology: Diagnosis, Imaging, Intervention Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott 1989: 86:1-11
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Ghantous V, Eisen T, Sherman A, Finkelstein F. Evaluating patients with renal failure for renal artery stenosis with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.  Am J Kidney Dis . 1999;  33 36-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rosen R. Angiography: General techniques, complications, and risk management. In: Taveras J, Ferrucci J, eds. Radiology: Diagnosis, Imaging, Intervention Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott, 1999: 143:11-14
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Dong Q, Schoenberg S, Carlos R, Prince M. Renal MR angiography.  Sem Intervent Radiol . 1998;  4 1-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Korosec F, Mistretta C. MR angiography: basic principles and theory.  MRI Clin North Am . 1998;  6 223-256
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sheppard S. Basic concepts in magnetic resonance angiography.  Radiol Clin North Am . 1995;  33 91-113
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Laissy J P, Benyounes M, Limot O. Screening of renal artery stenosis: assessment with magnetic resonance angiography at 1.0T.  Magn Reson Imaging . 1996;  14 1033-1041
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kim D, Edelman R, Kent K, Porter D, Skillman J. Abdominal aorta and renal artery stenosis: evaluation with MR angiography.  Radiology . 1990;  174 727-731
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Holland G, Dougherty L, Carpenter J. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries.  AJR Am J Roentgenol . 1996;  166 971-981
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Prince M. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.  Radiology . 1994;  191 155-164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Thornton J, O'Callaghan J, Walshe J. Comparison of digital subtraction angiography with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.  Eur Radiol . 1999;  9 930-934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rieumont M, Kaufman J, Geller S. Evaluation of renal artery stenosis with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.  AJR Am J Roentgenol . 1997;  169 39-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bakker J, Beek F, Beutler J. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography.  Radiology . 1998;  207 497-504
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hany T, Leung D, Pfammatter T, Debatin J. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries.  Invest Radiol . 1998;  33 653-659
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Schoenberg S, Bock M, Knopp M. Renal arteries: optimization of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with bolus-timing-independent fast multiphase acquisition in a single breath-hold.  Radiology . 1999;  211 667-679
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Miller S, Schick F, Duda S. Gd-enhanced 3D phase-contrast MR angiography and dynamic perfusion imaging in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.  Magn Reson Imaging . 1998;  16 1005-1012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hahn U, Miller S, Nagele T. Renal MR angiography at 1.0T: three-dimensional phase-contrast technique versus gadolinium enhanced 3D fast low-angle shot breath-hold imaging.  AJR Am J Roentgenol . 1999;  172 1501-1508
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gedroyc W, Neerhut P, Negus R. Magnetic resonance angiography of renal artery stenosis.  Clin Radiol . 1995;  50 436-439
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 de Haan M, Kouwenhoven M, Thelissen G. Renovascular disease in patients with hypertension: detection with systolic and diastolic gating in three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography.  Radiology . 1996;  198 449-456
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Paolini R M. Renovascular hypertension. In: Uflacker R, Wholey MH, eds. Interventional Radiology New York: McGraw Hill 1991: 401-413
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Tsuda K, Murakami T, Kim T. Helical CT angiography of living renal donors: comparison with 3D Fourier transformation phase-contrast MRA.  J Computer Assist Tomogr . 1998;  22 186-193
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Halpern E, Nazarian L, Wechsler R. US, CT, and MRI evaluation of accessory renal arteries and proximal renal artery branches.  Acad Radiol . 1999;  6 299-304
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Pfluger T, Czekalla R, Hundt C. MR angiography versus color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of renal vessels and the inferior vena cava in abdominal masses of pediatric patients.  AJR Am J Roentgenol . 1999;  173 103-108
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cohen C, Becker J. Imaging of renal transplantation and its complications.  Sem Intervent Radiol . 1998;  4 1-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar