Download PDF
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2001; 14(1): 015-024
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-13142
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Intra-abdominal Anastomotic Techniques

W. Brian Sweeney
  • Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55104
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2001 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Volumes have been written describing numerous methods for joining together two segments of intestine. The specific technique favored by an individual surgeon depends more on training, personal experience, and perhaps blind faith than on results from randomized, prospective controlled studies. The fact is no one particular intestinal anastomotic technique has proven scientifically to be superior. It appears that, if general principles are followed, any technique of joining two segments of intestine together should in most instances result in uncomplicated healing. The objective of this review is not to describe in detail individual anastomotic techniques for which references are provided. Rather, the objectives are threefold: (1) to review the basic principles of intestinal anastomosis, (2) to explore the operative decisions a surgeon makes faced with numerous anastomotic options, and (3) to summarize the complications of intestinal anastomosis. Anastomotic choices discussed in the second objective include the decision to perform an anastomosis, impact of bowel preparation, mechanical or sutured techniques, and adjuncts to anastomoses.

KEYWORD

Intestinal anastomosis - anastomotic leak - anastomotic technique - complications of anastomosis - principles of anastomosis

REFERENCES

  • 1 Keighley M RB, Williams N S. Surgery of the Anus, Rectum and Colon, 3rd ed. London: WB Saunders 1999
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Sabiston D C, Lyerly H K. Textbook of Surgery, 15th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1997: 356
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Garcia J G, Garcia Criado J F, Benito Persona A M, Alonso A G. Healing of colonic ischemic anastomoses in the rat.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1998;  41 892-895
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Irvin T T, Goliger J C. Etiology of disruption of intestinal anastomosis.  Br J Surg . 1973;  60 461-464
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Schrock T R, Deveney C W, Dunphy J E. Factors contributing to leakage of colonic anastomoses.  Ann Surg . 1973;  177 513-518
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Khoury G A, Waxman B P. Large bowel anastomosis, the healing process and sutured anastomosis: a review.  Br J Surg . 1983;  70 61-63
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Torralba J A, Robles R, Parrilla P. Subtotal colectomy versus intra-operative colonic irrigation in the management of obstructed left colon carcinoma.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1998;  41 18-22
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Hsu T-C. One-stage resection and anastomosis for acute obstruction of the left colon.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1998;  41 28-32
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Pahlman L, Glimelius B. Pre or post-operative radiotherapy in rectal and rectosigmoid carcinoma.  Ann Surg . 1990;  211 187-195
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Weiber S, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Pre-operative irradiation and colonic healing.  Eur J Surg . 1994;  160 47-51
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Rabau M, Eyal A, Kluger Y, Dayan D. Bursting pressure in anastomotic healing in experimentally induced colitis in rats.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1998;  41 468-472
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Yamamoto T, Bain I M, Allen R N, Keighley M RB. An audit of sticturoplasty for small-bowel Chron's disease.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1999;  42 797-803
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Platell C, Hall J. What is the role of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing colorectal surgery?.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1998;  41 875-883
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Miettinen R PJ, Laitinen S T, Makela J T, Paakkonen M E. Bowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution versus no preparation in elective open colorectal surgery: prospective, randomized study.  Dis Colon Rectum . 2000;  43 669-677
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kressner U, Antonsson J, Ejerblad S. Intraoperative colonic lavage and primary anastomosis-an alternative to Hartmann procedure in emergency surgery of the left colon.  Eur J Surg . 1994;  160 287-292
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Forloni B, Reduzzi R, Paludetti A. Intraoperative colonic lavage in emergency surgical treatment of left-sided colonic obstruction.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1998;  41 23-27
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Graffner H, Andersson L, Lowenhielm P, Walther B. The healing process of anastomoses of the colon: a comparative study using single, double-layer or stapled anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1984;  27 767-771
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Fingerhut A, Hay J M, Elhadad A. Supraperitoneal colorectal anastomoses: hand-sewn versus circular stapler-a controlled clinical trial.  Surgery . 1995;  118 479-485
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Wheeless C R, Smith J J. A comparison of the flow of iodine 125 through three different intestinal anastomoses: standard, Gambee, and stapler.  Obstet Gynecol . 1983;  62 513-518
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 McGinn S P, Gartell P C, Clifford P C, Brunton F J. Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial.  Br J Surg . 1985;  72 603-605
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 MacRae H M, McLeod R S. Hand-sewn versus stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1998;  41 180-189
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Gambee L P, Jarnjobst W, Hardwick L E. Ten year's experience with a single-layer anastomosis in colon surgery.  Am J Surg . 1956;  92 222-226
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Max E, Sweeney W B, Bailey H R. Results of 1000 single-layer continuous polypropylene intestinal anastomoses.  Am J Surg . 1991;  162 461-467
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Law W L, Bailey H R, Max E. Single-layer continuous colon and rectal anastomosis using monofilament absorbable suture (Maxon℗): a study of 500 cases.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1999;  42 736-740
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Bell R H, Rikkers L F, Mulholland M W. Digestive Tract Surgery: A Text and Atlas.  Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven 1996: 1472-1494
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Zollinger R M, Zollinger R M. Atlas of Surgical Operations. McGraw-Hill; 1993: 16-172
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Ravitch M M, Steichen F M. A stapling instrument for end-to-end inverting anastomoses in the gastrointestinal tract.  Ann Surg . 1979;  189 791-797
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27a Beck D E. Intraoperative Anastomotic Complications. In: Hicks TC, Beck DE, Timmcke AE, Opelka FG, eds. Complications in Colorectal Surgery Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1996: 70-81
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27b Last M D, Fazio V W. The rational use of the purse-string device in constructing anastomosis with the circular stapler.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1985;  28 979-980
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27c Khoury D A, Opelka F G. Anoscopic-insertion of end-to-end anastomosimg staplers.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1995;  38 553-554
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Roumen R H, Rahufen F TG, Wignen M W A H, Croiset Van Uchelen F A M A. ``Dog ear'' formation after double stapled low anterior resection as a risk for anastomotic disruption.  Dis Colon Rectum . 2000;  43 522-525
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Moritz E, Achleitner D, Holbling N. Single versus double stapling technique in colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized trial.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1991;  34 495-497
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Detry R J, Kartheuser A, Delriviere L. Use of the circular stapler in 1000 consecutive colorectal anastomoses: experience of one surgical team.  Surgery . 1995;  117 140-145
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Beard J D, Nicholson M L, Sayers R D. Intraoperative air testing of colorectal anastomoses: a prospective, randomized trial.  Br J Surg . 1990;  77 1095-1097
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Ho Y H, Tan M, Leong A. Anal pressures impaired by stapler insertion during colorectal anastomosis: a randomized, controlled trial.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1999;  42 89-95
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Wagensteen O H, Wagensteen S D. The Rise of Surgery: From Empiric Craft to Scientific Discipline.  Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1978: 120
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 34 Bubrick M P, Corman M L, Cahill C J. Prospective, randomized trial of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring.  Am J Surg . 1991;  161 136-143
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 DiCastro A, Biancari F, Brocato R. Intestinal anastomosis with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring.  Am J Surg . 1998;  176 472-474
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Choi H J, Kim H H, Jung G J, Kim S S. Intestinal anastomosis by use of the biofragmentable anastomotic ring: is it safe and efficacious in emergency operations as well?.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1998;  41 1281-1286
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Bailey R W, Flowers J L. Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery.  St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing 1995: 278-279
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 38 Thaler K, Schoenleben F, Scheiddach H. Laparoscopic-assisted colon anastomosis using the Valtrac ring: an animal study.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1999;  42 1196-1199
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Carter D C, Jankins D HR, Whitfield H N. Omental reinforcement of intestinal anastomoses.  Br J Surg . 1972;  59 10
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 McLachlin A D, Denton D W. Omental protection of intestinal anastomoses.  Am J Surg . 1973;  125 134
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Trowbridge P R, Howes E L. Reinforcement of colon anastomoses using polyurethane foam treated with neomycin: an experiemental study.  Am J Surg . 1967;  113 236
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Laufman H, Method H. Effects of absorbable foreign substance on bowel anastomosis.  Surg Gynecol Obstet . 1948;  86 669
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Hoffmann J, Shokouh-Amiri M H, Damm P, Jensen R. A prospective, controlled study of prophylactic drainage after colonic anastomoses.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1987;  30 449-452
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Sagar P M, Couse N, Kerin M. Randomized trial of drainage of colorectal anastomoses.  Br J Surg . 1993;  80 769-771
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Pakkastie T E, Luukkonen P E, Jarvinen H J. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum.  Eur J Surg . 1994;  160 293-297
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Ravo B, Ger R. A preliminary report on the intracolonic bypass as an alternative to temporary colostomy.  Surg Gynecol Obstet . 1984;  159 541-545
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Ravo B, Mishrick A, Addei K. The treatment of perforated diverticulitis by one-stage intracolonic bypass procedure.  Surgery . 1987;  102 771-776
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Vignali A, Fazio V W, Lavery I C. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients.  J Am Coll Surg . 1997;  185 105-113
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Luchtefeld M A, Milsom J W, Senagore A. Colorectal anastomotic stenosis: results of a survey of the ASCRS membership.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1989;  32 733-736
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar