A Prospective Controlled Trial of an Ultrathin Versus a Conventional Endoscope in Unsedated Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Background and Study Aims: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is performed without sedation in many countries. Unsedated patients experience more discomfort during endoscopy than sedated patients, but few studies have examined factors which could be modified to minimize discomfort during the procedure. We assessed the effect of endoscope diameter on patient discomfort during unsedated transoral gastroscopy.

Patients and Methods: A total of 322 patients attending for unsedated endoscopy were examined using an endoscope of diameter either 6.0 mm or 9.8 mm. Patients completed a two-part questionnaire assessing tolerance of the procedure and discomfort during it.

Results: There was failure to complete the initial unsedated endoscopy in three of 163 patients in the 6.0 mm group and 14 of 159 in the 9.8 mm group (P = 0.009). Patients in the 6.0 mm group reported less discomfort both during endoscope insertion (P < 0.0001) and during the remainder of the procedure (P < 0.0001). 14 % of patients in the 6.0 mm group indicated that they would request sedation if a further endoscopy were necessary, compared with 31 % in the 9.8 mm group (P = 0.0005).

Conclusions: Ultrathin endoscopes may have a role in clinical practice if randomized comparative studies with standard-bore instruments confirm that they do not compromise diagnostic quality.

References

• 1 Daneshmend T K, Bell G D, Logan R FA. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey.  Gut. 1991;  32 12-15
• 2 Keeffe E B, O’Connor K W. Survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;  36 13-18
• 3 Lazzaroni M, Bianchi Porro G. Preparation, premedication and surveillance.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 53-60
• 4 Arrowsmith J B, Gerstman B B, Fleischer D E, Benjamin S B. Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/US. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 421-427
• 5 Hedenbro J L, Ekelund M. Endoscopic perforation in unsedated patients undergoing endoscopy.  Br J Surg. 1996;  83 845-846
• 6 Froehlich F, Schwizer W, Thorens J, et al.. Concious sedation for gastroscopy: patient tolerance and cardiorespiratory parameters.  Gastroenterology. 1995;  108 697-704
• 7 Hedenboro J L, Lindblom A. Patient attitudes to sedation for diagnostic upper endoscopy.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1991;  26 1115-1120
• 8 Pereira S P, Hussaini S H, Hanson P JV, et al. Endoscopy: throat spray or sedation?.  J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994;  28 411-414
• 9 Hedenbro J L, Ekelund M, Jansson O, Lindblom A. A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study to evaluate topical anaesthesia in the pharynx in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1992;  24 585-587
• 10 Mulcahy H E, Greaves R RSH, Ballinger A, et al. A double-blind randomised trial of low-dose versus high-dose topical pharyngeal anaesthesia in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1996;  10 975-979
• 11 De Gregorio B T, Poorman J C, Katon R M. Peroral ultrathin endoscopy in adult patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 303-306
• 12 Shaker R. Unsedated trans-nasal pharyngoesophagogastroduodenoscopy (T-EGD).  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 346-348
• 13 Rey J F, Duforest D, Marek T A. Prospective comparison of nasal versus oral insertion of a thin video endoscope in healthy volounteers.  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 422-424
• 14 Dean R, Kulwinder D, Massey B, et al. A comparative study of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGD.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 422-424
• 15 Mulcahy H E, Fairclough P D. Ultrathin endoscopy in the initial assessment and treatment of upper and lower gastrointestinal strictures.  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1998;  48 618-620
• 16 Lehmann G A. Upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: are thinner endoscopes preferable?.  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 436-437
• 17 Zaman A, Hahn M, Hapke R, et al. A randomised trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 279-284
• 18 Dumortier J, Ponchon T, Scoazec J Y, et al. Prospective evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: feasibility and study on performance and tolerance.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 285-291
• 19 Craig A, Hanlon J, Dent J, Schoeman M. A comparison of transnasal and transoral endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 292-296
• 20 Tan C C, Freeman J G. Throat spray for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is quite acceptable to patients.  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 277-282
• 21 Martin J P, Arlett P A, Holdstock G. Development of a sedation policy for upper GI endoscopy based on an audit of patients’ perception of the procedure.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;  8 355-357
• 22 Jacob P, Kahrilas P J, Logemann J A, et al. Upper oesophageal sphincter opening and modulation during swallowing.  Gastroenterology. 1989;  97 1469-1478
• 23 Kahrilas P J, Shezhang L, Chen J, Logemann J A. Oropharyngeal accommodation to swallow volume.  Gastroenterology. 1996;  111 297-306
• 24 Sato H, Kodama T, Tatsumi Y, et al. New pancreatoscopy for the next generation development of peroral electronic pancreatoscope system.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 54
• 25 Mulcahy H E, Fairclough P D. Ultrathin endoscopy and difficult duodenal intubation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 115