Semin Reprod Med 2001; 19(2): 147-158
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-15395
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Ring X and Other Structural X Chromosome Abnormalities: X Inactivation and Phenotype

Kathleen A. Leppig1 4 , Christine M. Disteche2 3
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • 2Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • 3Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • 4Genetic Services, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Washington
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
31. Dezember 2001 (online)

Preview

ABSTRACT

Patients who carry a structural abnormality of the X chromosome are a fascinating group who have provided opportunities to evaluate genotype/phenotype correlation in relation to X chromosome content and inactivation. Turner syndrome (TS) is most commonly associated with a 45,X karyotype and presents with an array of phenotypes, the main ones being poor viability in utero, ovarian failure and infertility, short stature, lymphedema, and other congenital malformations but usually not mental retardation. In some TS patients the karyotype shows both a normal X and a structurally rearranged X chromosome. These structural abnormalities, which include deletions, duplications, inversions, translocations, and rings, are associated with chromosome breaks and significant imbalance of gene content of the X chromosome. However, such abnormalities are generally well tolerated because of the preferential inactivation of the abnormal X, which can restore, at least in part, a balanced genetic makeup. This beneficial effect of X inactivation results in a mild phenotype in most patients with structural abnormalities of the X, similar to that found in TS patients with a 45,X karyotype. However, in cases of ring X chromosomes and of X/autosome translocations the incidence of mental retardation and other congenital abnormalities can be significantly higher than in TS. These abnormal phenotypes can be ascribed to failed or partial X inactivation and/or incomplete selection in favor of cells with normal balance of gene expression. In this article, we present phenotype/genotype correlation in female patients with structural abnormalities of the X and address the role of X inactivation and cell selection in the phenotypic findings. Our review emphasizes a subset of rare patients with ring X chromosomes who have provided evidence of a direct role for X inactivation in determining phenotypes.

REFERENCES