Background and Study Aims: Bleeding due to esophageal variceal rupture is associated with an extremely high
mortality rate. Variceal bleeding is frequent in patients who have a red color sign
on endoscopy. However, the red color sign is subjectively evaluated on the basis of
color tone and the shape of the varices. To allow standardization and facilitate consensus,
an objective method of assessing the red color sign is needed. In this study, a system
was established for quantifying the red color sign during endoscopic evaluation.
Patients and Methods: Between July 1995 and February 1997, 55 untreated patients with portal hypertension
and esophageal varices identified on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were enrolled
in the study. Images obtained about 5 cm oral to the esophagogastric junction during
endoscopy were stored on magnetic optical disks using an endoscopic image processor.
The still images were transmitted to a computer and analyzed using computer software.
The RGB components (R, red; G, green; B, blue) were measured at points showing flare
consistent with the red color sign. The endoscopic assessment was based on the Japanese
Research Society for Portal Hypertension’s general rules for recording endoscopic
findings in esophagogastric varices.
Results: The ratio of the red color area to the variceal area increased with increasing red
color grade. There were significant positive correlations between the R and G, and
G and B components. This suggests that comparing the R components alone would allow
assessment of the color differences in the red color area and in the varices. The
R value was significantly higher in the red color area (115 ± 20) than in the varices
(57 ± 19). An R value of 90 was found at the boundary between the two parts (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: The red color area can be automatically calculated and quantified using the analysis
program. Improvements in data storage methods may allow real-time evaluation during
endoscopy in the future.
References
1
Graham D Y, Smith J L.
The course of patients after variceal hemorrhage.
Gastroenterology.
1981;
80
800-809
2
Jackson F C, Perrin E B, Smith A G, et al.
A clinical investigation of the portacaval shunt: survival analysis of the prophylactic
operation.
Am J Surg.
1968;
11
22-42
3
Resnick R H, Chalmers T C, Ishihara A M, et al.
A controlled study of the prophylactic portacaval shunt: a final report.
Ann Intern Med.
1969;
70
675-688
4
Garsia-Tsao G, Grossmann R J, Fisher R L, et al.
Portal pressure, presence of gastroesophageal varices and variceal bleeding.
Hepatology.
1985;
5
419-424
5
Kleber G, Sauerbruch T, Ausari H, et al.
Prediction of variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis: a prospective follow-up study.
Gastroenterology.
1991;
100
1332-1337
6
Beppu K, Inokuchi K, Koyanagi N, et al.
Prediction of variceal hemorrhage by esophageal endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1981;
27
213-218
7
Fukuda K, Toyonaga A, Yasumoto M, et al.
Endoscopic observation of esophageal varices and its clinical significance.
Gastroenterol Endosc.
1981;
23
212-223
8
Arakawa M, Noda T, Fukuda K, et al.
Clinicopathological studies of esophageal varices: histological findings of ruptured
esophageal varix and its relationship to endoscopic findings.
Gastroenterol Endosc.
1985;
27
191-198
9
Rigau J, Bosch J, Bordas J M, et al.
Endoscopic measurement of variceal pressure in cirrhosis: correlation with portal
pressure and variceal hemorrhage.
Gastroenterology.
1989;
96
873-880
10
Kleber G, Sauerbruch T, Fischer G, Paumgartner G.
Pressure of intraoesophageal varices assessed by fine needle puncture: its relation
to endoscopic signs and severity of liver disease in patients with cirrhosis.
Gut.
1989;
30
228-232
11
Paquet K J, Kalk J F, Klein C P, et al.
Prophylactic sclerotherapy for esophageal varices in high-risk cirrhotic patients
selected by endoscopic and hemodynamic criteria: a randomized, single-center controlled
trial.
Endoscopy.
1994;
26
734-740
12
Pötzi R, Bauer P, Schöfl R, et al.
Prophylactic endoscopic sclerotherapy of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis: long-term
follow-up and final results of a multicenter prospective controlled randomized trial
in Vienna.
Endoscopy.
1993;
25
287-289
13
Koch H, Binmoeller K F, Grimm H, et al.
Prophylactic sclerotherapy for esophageal varices: long-term results of a prospective
study.
Endoscopy.
1994;
26
729-733
14
Japanese R esearch.
General rules for recording endoscopic findings on esophageal varices.
Jpn J Surg.
1980;
10
84-87
15
Idezuki Y.
General rules for recording endoscopic findings of esophagogastric varices (1991).
Japanese Society for Portal Hypertension.
World J Surg.
1995;
19
420-422
16
Siringo S, McCormick P A, Mistry P, et al.
Prognostic significance of the white nipple sign in variceal bleeding.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1991;
37
51-55
17
Spence R AJ, Terblanche J.
Venous anatomy of the lower esophagus: a new perspective on varices.
Br J Surg.
1987;
74
59-60
18
Wexler M J.
Treatment of bleeding esophageal varices by transection with the EEA stapling instrument.
Surgery.
1980;
88
406-416
19
[Anon] .
Recording standards for endoscopic findings of esophageal varices and the assessment
of risky varices.
Nippon Rinsho.
1990;
4
672-678
20
Gerhard K, Tilman S, Hasan A, et al.
Prediction of variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis: a prospective follow-up study.
Gastroenterology.
1991;
100
1332-1337
S. Ichikawa, M.D.
Second Department of Internal Medicine School of Medicine University of Tokushima
3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho Tokushima City Tokushima 770-8503 Japan
Fax: + 81-88-633-9235
eMail: soichi@clin.med.tokushima-u.ac.jp