Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2001; 14(3): 243-252
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-16552
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Perineal Approaches for Rectal Prolapse

Julio Faria, Alan G. Thorson
  • Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NB
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
22. August 2001 (online)

ABSTRACT

Rectal prolapse remains an uncommon disorder, the optimal surgical treatment of which has eluded surgeons for centuries. Recently, there has been resurgent interest in the use of perineal approaches for its management. Compared with transabdominal approaches, perineal approaches have long been felt to be less technically demanding for the surgeon and to be less stressful on the patient, permitting an expedient and uneventful recovery for even the highest-risk patient. Reports of improved recurrence rates, amelioration of symptoms of fecal incontinence, and lack of exacerbation of constipation and sexual dysfunction have made perineal approaches to rectal prolapse attractive. Perineal approaches currently in use include perineal rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier procedure), mucosal sleeve resection (Delorme procedure), and anal encirclement (Thiersch procedure). This article describes these procedures as they are used to treat rectal prolapse and provides an update of the most recent results reported with these procedures.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Mikulicz J. Zur operativen behandlung des prolapsus recti et coli invaginati.  Arch Klin Chir . 1889;  38 74-97
  • 2 Altemeier W A, Culbertson W R, Schowengerdt C, Hunt J. Nineteen years' experience with the one-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse.  Ann Surg . 1971;  173 993-1006
  • 3 Prasad M L, Pearl R K, Abcarian H. Perineal proctectomy, posterior rectopexy, and postanal levator repair for the treatment of rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1986;  29 547-552
  • 4 Yoshioka K, Hyland G, Keighley M R. Anorectal function after abdominal rectopexy: parameters of predictive value in identifying return of continence.  Br J Surg . 1989;  76 64-68
  • 5 Deen K I, Grant E, Billingham C, Keighley M R. Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg . 1994;  81 302-304
  • 6 Agachan F, Pfeifer J, Joo J S. Results of perineal procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse.  Am Surg . 1997;  63 9-12
  • 7 Kim D S, Tsang C B, Wong W D. Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1999;  42 460-466
  • 8 Delorme R. Sur le traitement des prolapsus du rectum totaux pour l'excision de la muqueuse rectale ou rectocolique.  Bull Mem Soc Chir Paris . 1900;  26 498-499
  • 9 Uhlig B E, Sullivan E S. The modified Delorme operation: its place in surgical treatment for massive rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1979;  22 513-521
  • 10 Nay H R, Blair C R. Perineal surgical repair of rectal prolapse.  Am J Surg . 1972;  123 577-579
  • 11 Moskalenko V W. Modification of Delorme's resection of rectal mucosa for prolapse of the rectum.  Int Surg . 1973;  58 192-194
  • 12 Lechaux J P, Lechaux D, Perez M. Results of Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse. Advantages of a modified technique.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1995;  38 301-307
  • 13 Plusa S M, Charig J A, Balaji V. Physiological changes after Delorme's procedure for full-thickness rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg . 1995;  82 1475-1478
  • 14 Chow P K, Ho Y H. Abdominal resection rectopexy versus Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse: comparison of clinical and physiological outcomes.  Int J Colorectal Dis . 1996;  11 201-202
  • 15 Penninckx F, D'Hoore A, Sohier S, Kerremans R. Abdominal resection rectopexy versus Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse: a predictable outcome.  Int J Colorectal Dis . 1997;  12 49-50
  • 16 Senapati A, Nicholls R J, Thomson J P, Phillips R K. Results of Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1994;  37 456-460
  • 17 Pescatori M, Interisano A, Stolfi V M, Zoffoli M. Delorme's operation and sphincteroplasty for rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence.  Int J Colorectal Dis . 1998;  13 223-227
  • 18 Terrell R V. Experience with Thiersch wire in rectal prolapse.  AORN J . 1968;  8 72-76
  • 19 Wilson E. Thiersch's operation.  Aust NZ J Surg . 1969;  38 239-243
  • 20 Hopkinson B R, Hardman J. Silicone rubber perianal suture for rectal prolapse.  Proc R Soc Med . 1973;  66 1095-1098
  • 21 Jackaman F R, Francis J N, Hopkinson B R. Silicone rubber band treatment of rectal prolapse.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl . 1980;  62 386-387
  • 22 Sainio A P, Halme L E, Husa A I. Anal encirclement with polypropylene mesh for rectal prolapse and incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1991;  34 905-908
  • 23 Labow S B, Hoexter B, Moseson M D. Modification of silastic sling repair for rectal procidentia and anal incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1985;  28 684-685
  • 24 Thorlakson R H. A modification of the Thiersch procedure for rectal prolapse using polyester tape.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1982;  25 57-58
  • 25 Poole G VJ, Pennell T C, Myers R T, Hightower F. Modified Thiersch operation for rectal prolapse. Technique and results.  Am Surg . 1985;  51 226-229
  • 26 Rye B A, Seidelin C, Dueholm S. Perineal progressive myonecrosis following Thiersch's operation for rectal prolapse.  Ann Chir Gynaecol . 1987;  76 136-137
  • 27 Pikarsky A J, Joo J S, Wexner S D. Recurrent rectal prolapse: what is the next good option?.  Dis Colon Rectum . 2000;  43 1273-1276
  • 28 Fengler S A, Pearl R K, Prasad M L. Management of recurrent rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1997;  40 832-834
  • 29 Hool G R, Hull T L, Fazio V W. Surgical treatment of recurrent complete rectal prolapse: a thirty-year experience.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1997;  40 270-272
  • 30 Friedman R, Muggia S M, Freund H R. Experience with the one-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1983;  26 789-791
  • 31 Gopal K A, Amshel A L, Shonberg I L, Eftaiha M. Rectal procidentia in elderly and debilitated patients. Experience with the Altemeier procedure.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1984;  27 376-381
  • 32 Watts J D, Rothenberger D A, Buls J G. The management of procidentia: 30 years' experience.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1985;  28 96-102
  • 33 Finlay I G, Aitchison M. Perineal excision of the rectum for prolapse in the elderly.  Br J Surg . 1991;  78 687-689
  • 34 Thorne M C, Polglase A L. Perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse in elderly and debilitated patients.  Aust NZ J Surg . 1992;  62 791-794
  • 35 Williams J G, Rothenberger D A, Madoff R D, Goldberg S M. Treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1992;  35 830-834
  • 36 Johansen O B, Wexner S D, Daniel N. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy in the elderly.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1993;  36 767-772
  • 37 Ramanujam P S, Venkatesh K S, Fietz M J. Perineal excision of rectal procidentia in elderly high-risk patients. A ten-year experience.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1994;  37 1027-1030
  • 38 Agachan F, Reissman P, Pfeifer J. Comparison of three perineal procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse.  South Med J . 1997;  90 925-932
  • 39 Yoshioka K, Ogunbiyi O A, Keighley M R. Pouch perineal rectosigmoidectomy gives better functional results than conventional rectosigmoidectomy in elderly patients with rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg . 1998;  85 1525-1526
  • 40 Christiansen J, Kirkegaard P. Delorme's operation for complete rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg . 1981;  68 537-538
  • 41 Gundersen A L, Cogbill T H, Landercasper J. Reappraisal of Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1985;  28 721-724
  • 42 Monson J R, Jones N A, Vowden P, Brennan T G. Delorme's operation: the first choice in complete rectal prolapse?.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl . 1986;  68 143-146
  • 43 Houry S, Lechaux J P, Huguier M, Molkhou J M. Treatment of rectal prolapse by Delorme's operation.  Int J Colorectal Dis . 1987;  2 149-152
  • 44 Abulafi A M, Sherman I W, Fiddian R V, Rothwell J R. Delorme's operation for rectal prolapse.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl . 1990;  72 382-385
  • 45 Graf W, Ejerblad S, Krog M. Delorme's operation for rectal prolapse in elderly or unfit patients.  Eur J Surg . 1992;  158 555-557
  • 46 White S, Stitz R W. Rectal prolapse: Delorme or Ripstein repair.  Aust NZ J Surg . 1992;  62 193-195
  • 47 Oliver G C, Vachon D, Eisenstat T E. Delorme's procedure for complete rectal prolapse in severely debilitated patients. An analysis of 41 cases.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1994;  37 461-467
  • 48 Tobin S A, Scott I H. Delorme operation for rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg . 1994;  81 1681-1684
  • 49 Kling K M, Rongione A J, Evans B, McFadden D W. The Delorme procedure: a useful operation for complicated rectal prolapse in the elderly.  Am Surg . 1996;  62 857-860
  • 50 Pescatori M. Anal continence after surgery for rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1998;  41 405
  • 51 Yakut M, Kaymakcioglu N, Simsek A. Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. A retrospective analysis of 94 cases.  Int Surg . 1998;  83 53-55
  • 52 Watts A M, Thompson M R. Evaluation of Delorme's procedure as a treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg . 2000;  87 218-222
  • 58 Dietzen C D, Pemberton J H. Perineal approaches for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse.  Neth J Surg . 1989;  41 140-144
  • 53 Labow S, Rubin R J, Hoexter B, Salvati E P. Perineal repair of rectal procidentia with an elastic fabric sling.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1980;  23 467-469
  • 54 Hunt T M, Fraser I A, Maybury N K. Treatment of rectal prolapse by sphincteric support using silastic rods.  Br J Surg . 1985;  72 491-492
  • 55 Larach S W, Vazquez B. Modified Thiersch procedure with silastic mesh implant: a simple solution for fecal incontinence and severe prolapse.  South Med J . 1986;  79 307-309
  • 56 Earnshaw J J, Hopkinson B R. Late results of silicone rubber perianal suture for rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1987;  30 86-88
  • 57 Khanduja K S, Hardy-TG J, Aguilar P S. A new silicone-prosthesis in the modified Thiersch operation.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1988;  31 380-383