End of the Millenium - End of the Single Thoracic Artery Graft? Two Thoracic Arteries - Standard for the Next Millenium?[*]

Purpose: CABG with bilateral IMA grafts (BIMA) can improve long-term results in cardiac morbidity and mortality. An enhanced incidence of bleeding and wound complications compared to patients with single IMA (SIMA) remains a matter of debate. The aim of the study was to compare the operative outcomes of patients who had undergone CABG with BIMA and SIMA in situ grafts, especially to identify patient-related risk factors, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus and age above 70 years. Methods: Out of a total of 5,144 patients operated on between January 1996 and September 1999, patients with isolated CABG (n = 3,671) with BIMA or SIMA were analyzed retrospectively. In the BIMA group, the patients' (n = 1,487) mean age was 64.0 years; mean EF was 62.1 %. In the SIMA group (n = 2,184), the mean age was 65.4 years and mean EF 60.6 % (n. s.). In the BIMA group, the right IMA was anterior of the aorta to the LAD, the left IMA to the lateral wall. In the SIMA group, the LAD was revascularisized with the left IMA. Additional bypasses were performed with vein grafts. Results: The 30-day lethality was 1.6 % in the BIMA group, 1.7 % in the SIMA group in patients under 70, and 4.1 % (BIMA) and 4.0 % (SIMA) in patients over 70 (p = n. s.). A significantly higher blood loss was observed in the BIMA group (BIMA 979 ± 708 ml, SIMA 790 ± 575 ml, p < 0.05). The rethoracotomy rate due to bleeding was significantly higher in patients with BIMA (4.1 %) compared to those with SIMA (2.5 %, p < 0.05). In patients with a body mass index (BMI) of less than 27, no significant difference could be found (SIMA 2.8 %, BIMA 3.4 %, p = n. s.). Patients with a BMI > 27 showed a significantly higher rethoracotomy rate (SIMA 2.2 %, BIMA 4.9 %). A higher incidence of sternal instabilities could be observed in the BIMA group (4.2 %, p < 0.05). Diabetes mellitus could not be identified as an independent risk factor for sternal complications (SIMA 2.9 %, BIMA 5.0 %, p = n. s.). Couclusion: CABG using both IMA's can be performed in nearly all patients as a routine method with good clinical results and low mortality. Bleeding in the BIMA group within 48 hours was increased. BMI > 27 could be identified as a risk factor for sternal complications, but not diabetes mellitus or age over 70 years.

Key words:

Coronary artery disease - Arterial revascularization - Bilateral JMA grafting

1 Presented at the 3^rd Joint Meeting of the German, the Austrian and the Swiss Societies for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, February 9 - 12, 2000 Lucerne

References

• 1 Loop F D, Lytle B W, Cosgrove D M, Stewart R W, Goormastic M, Williams G W, Golding L A R, Gill C C, Taylor P C, Sheldon W C, Proudfit W L. Influence of the internal mammary artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events.  N Eng J Med. 1986;  314 1-6
• 2 Grondin C M, Campell L, Lesperance J, Enjalbert M, Bourassa M. Comparison of Iater changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in two consecutive series of patients 10 years after operation.  Circulation. 1984;  70 2208-2221
• 3 Lytle B W, Loop F D, Cosgrove D. et al . Longterm (5 - 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;  89 248-258
• 4 Lytle B W, Cosgrove D M. Coronary artery bypass surgery.  Curr Probl Surg. 1992;  29 737-807
• 5 Barner H B, Barnett M G. Fifteen- to twenty-one-year angiographic assessment of internal thoracic artery as a bypass conduit.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;  57 1526-1528
• 6 Cameron A, Davies K B, Green G E. Coronary bypass surgery with internal thoracic artery grafts. Effects on survival over a 15-year period.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  334 216-219
• 7 Schmidt S E, Jones J W, Thornby J I, Miller C C, Beall A C. Improved survival with multiple left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;  64 9-15
• 8 Chow M S T, Sim E, Orszulak T A, Schaff H V. Patency of internal thoracic artery grafts: Comparison of right versus left and importance of vessel grafted.  Circulation. 1994;  90 (Part 2) II-129-132
• 9 Jones J W, Ochsner J L, Mills N L. The internal mammary bypass graft: a superior second coronary artery.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1978;  75 625-631
• 10 Pick A W, Osrzulak T A, Anderson B J, Schaff H V. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10 year outcome analysis.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;  64 599-605
• 11 Lytle B W, Blackstone E H, Loop F D, Houghtaling P L, Arnold J H, Akhrass R, McCarthy P M, Cosgrove D M. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;  117 855-872
• 12 Earner H B. Double internal mammary-coronary artery bypass graft.  Arch Surg. 1974;  102 627-631
• 13 Lytle B W, Cosgrove D M, Loop F D, Borsh J, Goormastic M, Taylor P C. Perioperative risk of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: analysis of 500 cases from 1971 to 1984.  Circulation. 1986;  74 (Suppl. III) 37-41
• 14 Dewar L R S, Jamieson W R E, Janusz M T, Adelisardo M, Germann E, MacNab J S, Tyers F O. Unilateral versus bilateral internal mammary revascularisation, survival and event-free performance.  Circulation. 1995;  92 (Suppl. II) 118-1113
• 15 Calafiore A M. Total arterial myocardial revascularisation.  Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon. 1997;  45 105-108
• 16 Sergeant P T, Blackstone E H, Meyns B P. Does arterial revascularisation degree the risk of infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting?.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  66 1-11
• 17 Dietl C A, Benoit C H, Gilbert C L. et al . Which is the graft of choice for the right coronary and posterior descending arteries? Comparison of the right internal mammary artery and the right gastroepiploic artery.  Circulation. 1995;  92 (Suppl: II) 92-97
• 18 Mestree C A, Rives A, Iqual A. Atherosclerosis of the internal mammary artery; histopathological analyses and implications of its results in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;  34 356-358
• 19 Van Son J A, Smedts F, Vincent J G, Lier H J, Kibat K. Comparative anatomic studies of various arterial conduits for myocardial revascularization.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;  99 703-707
• 20 Bamer H B, Kaiser G C, Jelinek M. et al . Aortocoronary veingraft and internal mammary-coronary anastomosis.  Arch Surg. 1972;  105 908-911
• 21 Fiore A C, Naunheim K S, Dean P. et al . Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: Single versus double grafts.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;  49 202-209
• 22 Kouchoukas N T, Wareing T H, Murphy S F. et al . Risks of bilateral internal mammary artery bypass grafting.  Annthorac Surg. 1990;  49 210-229
• 23 Sergeant P, Lesaffre E, Flameng W. et al . Internal mammary artery: methods of use and their effect on survival after coronary artery bypass.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1990;  4 72-78
• 24 Naunheim K S, Bamer H B, Fiore A C. Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: Single versus double grafts (Update).  Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;  53 716-718
• 25 Gansera B, Haschemi A, Angelis I, Eichinger W, Breuer M, Keiditsch E, Kemkes B M. Cardiac Surgery in Patients with Previous Carcinoma of the Breast and Mediastinal Irradiation: Is the Internal Thoracic Artery Graft obsolete ?.  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;  47 376-380
• 26 Breuer M, Gansera B, Kiask T, Kemkes B M. Cardiac Surgery in Patients with Dialysis-Dependent Renal Failure: Routine or Risk?.  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;  48 (Suppl I) 90

1 Presented at the 3^rd Joint Meeting of the German, the Austrian and the Swiss Societies for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, February 9 - 12, 2000 Lucerne