Abstract
The aim of the present study was to compare the physiological responses during arm exercises when the crank rate was chosen spontaneously (TS ) or set at ± 20 % (T-20 , T+ 20 ) of the spontaneously chosen crank rate (SCCR). Eight physical education male students, aged 22 ± 3.2 years, performed an upper body exercise in which intensities ranged from unload to 80 % of maximal power. No significant difference was observed in oxygen uptake, ventilation, gross and net efficiency values between TS and T+ 20 or T-20 . Nevertheless, oxygen uptake and ventilation were significantly (p < 0.05) lower and gross and net efficiencies higher (p < 0.05) during T-20 than T+ 20 . No significant difference was noticed for heart rate, delta and work efficiency between TS , T-20 and T+ 20 . The hypothesis that SCCR is the most economical one according to the efficiency parameters was not quite verified. However, crank rates lower than SCCR could be interesting because they increase gross efficiency compared to higher crank rates. Moreover, the selection of crank rates depends on power output. Indeed, SCCR increased significantly (p < 0.05) with power output. In the physical reconditioning of injured or handicapped subjects, the latter are very sensitive to the power output, and the crank rate could be another constraint.
Key words
Spontaneously chosen crank rates · upper body exercise · cardiorespiratory parameters · efficiency
References
1 Astrand P O, Rodahl K. Précis de physiologie. Paris; Masson 1977
2
Banister E W, Jackson R C.
The effect of speed and load changes on oxygen intake for equivalent power output during bicycle ergometry.
Int Z Angew Physiol einschl Arbeitsphysiol.
1967;
24
284-290
3
Coast J R, Welch H G.
Linear increase in optimal pedal rate with increased power output in cycle ergometry.
Eur J Appl Physiol.
1985;
53
339-342
4
Corlett E, Mahadeva K.
A relationship between a freely chosen working pace and energy consumption curves.
Ergonomics.
1970;
4
517-524
5
Dickinson S.
The efficiency of bicycle-pedalling as affected by speed and load.
J Physiol.
1929;
67
242-255
6
Faulkner J A, Roberts D E, Elk R L, Conway J.
Cardiovascular responses to submaximum and maximum effort cycling and running.
J Appl Physiol.
1971;
30
457-461
7
Gaesser G A, Brooks G A.
Muscular efficiency during steady-rate exercise: effects of speed and work rate.
J Appl Physiol.
1975;
38
1132-1139
8
Glaser R M.
Arm exercise training for wheelchair users.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
1989;
21
149-157
9
Hagan R D, Weis S E, Raven P B.
Effect of pedal rate on cardiorespiratory responses during continuous exercise.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
1992;
24
1088-1095
10
Hagberg J M, Mullin J P, Giese M D, Spitzagel E.
Effect of pedalling rate on sub maximal exercise responses of competitive cyclists.
J Appl Physiol.
1981;
51
447-451
11 Jones P RM, Campbell E JM. Clinical exercise testing. London; Saunders 1982: 235-239
12
Mc Millan N, Gurovich A.
Effect of pedal cadence on metabolic parameters of cycling performance.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
1994;
26
S113
13
Marais G, Weissland T, Robin H, Vanvelcenaher J, Lavoie J M, Pelayo P.
Physiological effects of variations in spontaneously chosen crank rate during sub-maximal and supra-maximal upper body exercises.
Int J Sports Med.
1999;
20
239-245
14
Marsh A P, Martin P E.
The association between cycling experience and preferred and most economical cadences.
Med Sci Sport Exerc.
1993;
25
1269-1274
15
Marsh A P, Martin P E.
Effect of cadence, cycling experience, and aerobic power on delta efficiency during cycling.
Med Sci Sport Exerc.
2000;
23
1630-1634
16
Millet G Y, Hoffman M D, Candau R, Buckwalter J B, Clifford P S.
Cycle variations in roller ski skating: effects on oxygen uptake and poling forces.
Int J Sports Med.
1998;
19
521-525
17
Pelayo P, Sidney M, Weissland T.
Effects of variations in spontaneously chosen rate during crank upper-body and swimming exercise.
J Hum Movem Study.
1997;
32
1-10
18
Powers S K, Beadle R E, Mangum M.
Exercise efficiency during arm ergometry: effects of speed and work rate.
J Appl Physiol.
1984;
56
495-499
19
Saltin B, Astrand P O.
Maximal oxygen uptake in athletes.
J Appl Physiol.
1967;
23
353-358
20
Salvendy G, Pilitsis J.
Psychophysiological aspects of paced and unpaced performance as influenced by age.
Ergonomics.
1971;
6
703-711
21
Sawka M N, Foley M E, Pimental N A, Toner M M, Pandolf K B.
Determination of maximal aerobic power during upper-body exercise.
J Appl Physiol.
1983;
54
113-117
22
Sawka M N.
Physiology of upper body exercise.
Exer Sports Sci Rev.
1986;
14
175-211
23
Seabury J J, Adams W C, Ramey M R.
Influence of pedalling rate and power output on energy expenditure during bicycle ergometry.
Ergonomics.
1977;
20
491-498
24
Sidossis L S, Horowitz J F, Coyle E F.
Load and velocity of contraction influence gross and delta mechanical efficiency.
Int J Sports Med.
1992;
13
407-411
25
Takaishi T, Yasuda Y, Moritani T.
Neuromuscular fatigue during prolonged pedalling exercise at different pedalling rates.
Eur J Appl Physiol.
1994;
69
154-158
26
Takaishi T, Yasuda Y, Ono T, Moritani T.
Optimal pedaling estimated from neuromuscular fatigue for cyclists.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
1996;
28
1492-1497
27
Taylor H L, Buskirk E, Hensche L A.
Maximal oxygen intake as an objective measure of cardio respiratory performance.
J Appl Physiol.
1955;
8
73-80
28
Weissland T, Pelayo P, Vanvelcenaher J, Marais G, Lavoie J M, Robin H.
Physiological effects of variations of spontaneously chosen crank rate in incremental upper body exercise.
Eur J Appl Physiol.
1997;
76
428-433
29
Woude L H, Veeger H E, Rozendal R H, Sargeant A J.
Optimum cycle frequencies in hand-rim wheelchair propulsion. Wheelchair propulsion technique.
Eur J Appl Physiol.
1989;
58
625-632
G. Marais
Faculté des Sciences du Sport et de l’EP · Université de Lille 2
9 rue de l’université · 59790 Ronchin · France ·
Phone: +33 (0320) 887379
Fax: +33 (0320) 887377
Email: gmarais@hp-sc.univ-lille2.fr