Download PDF
Viszeralchirurgie 2002; 37(1): 30-35
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-20325
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Schließmuskelersatz als Therapie der Inkontinenz

Anal Sphincter Replacement for fecal incontinenceE.  Berg
  • 1Koloproktologie Prosper-Hospital Recklinghausen
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 February 2002 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Schließmuskelersatzoperationen sind eine neue Therapieoption in der Behandlung der sonst therapierefraktären anorektalen Inkontinenz. Der Ersatz erfolgt durch eine elektrisch stimulierte Skelettmuskeltransposition, vorzugsweise des Musculus gracilis, oder durch einen künstlichen Schließmuskel. Beide Verfahren sind teuer und komplikationsträchtig. Eine Kontinenzverbesserung gelingt in 60 - 70 %.

Abstract

Anal sphincter replacement offers a new treatment option for patients with severe refractory fecal incontinence. The procedures are electrically stimulated skeletal muscle neosphincter, using especially the gracilis muscle and artificial anal sphincter. Both operations are expensive and can produce many complications. The success rate is 60 - 70 %.

Schlüsselwörter

Schließmuskelersatz - dynamische Grazilisplastik - künstlicher Schließmuskel

Key words

Anal sphincter replacement - Dynamic graciloplasty - Artificial bowel sphincter

Literatur

  • 1 Nelson R, Norton N, Cauteley E, Furner S. Communitybased prevalence of anal incontinence.  JAMA. 1995;  274 559-561
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rothbarth J, Bememan W, Meijerink J H, Stiggelbout A M, Zwindermann A H, Buyze-Westerweel M E. et al . What is the impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 67-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Engel A F, Kamm M A, Sultan A H, Bartram C I, Nicholls R J. Anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 1231-1234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Vaizey C J, Kamm M A, Nicholls R J. Recent advances in the surgical treatment of faecal incontinence.  Br J Surg. 1998;  85 596-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pickrell K L, Broadbent T R, Masters F W, Metzger J T. Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal incontinence by transplanting the gracilis muscle: a report of four cases in children.  Ann Surg. 1952;  135 853-863
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pickrell K L. Gracilis muscle transplant for the correction of neurogenic rectal incontinence.  Surg Clin North Am. 1959;  39 1405
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Yoshioka K, Keighley M RB. Clinical and manometric assessment of gracilis muscle transplant for faecal incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;  31 767-769
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Baeten C, Spaans F, Fluks A. An implanted neuromuscular stimulator for fecal continence following previously implanted gracilis muscle: report of a case.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;  31 134-137
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Baeten C G, Konsten J, Spaans F, Visser R, Habets A M, Bourgeois I M. et al . Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence.  Lancet. 1991;  338 1163-1165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Williams N S, Patel J, George B D, Hallan R I, Watkins E S. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter.  Lancet. 1991;  338 1166-1169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Konsten J, Baeten C G, Havenith M G, Soetrers P B. Morphology of dynamic graciloplasty compared with the anal sphincter.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 ;  36 559-563
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cavina E, Seccia M, Evangelista G, Chiarugi M, Buccianti P, Chiricio A. et al . Construction of a perineal colostomy by using electrostimulated gracilis muscles after abdominoperineal resection: personal technique and experience with 32 cases.  It J Surg Sci. 1987;  17 305-314
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Williams N S, Hallan R I, Koeze T H, Watkins E S. Construction of a neorectum and neoanal sphincter following previous proctocolectomy.  Br J Surg. 1989;  76 1191-1194
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Geerdes B P, Heinemann E, Konsten J, Soeters P B, Baeten C G. Dynamic graciloplasty: complications and management.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 912-917
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Baeten C G, Bailey H R, Bakka A, Belliveau P, Berg E and the Dynamic Graciloplasty Study G roup. Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective multicenter trial.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 743-751
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wexner S. The dynamic graciloplasty study group . Long-term efficacy and quality of life after dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  April A9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Christiansen J, Rasmussen O, Lindorff-Larsen K. Dynamic graciloplasty for severe anal incontinence.  Br J Surg. 1998;  85 88-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Mavrarantonis C, Wexner S. Stimulated graciloplasty for treatment of intractable fecal incontinence: critical influence of the method of stimulation.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 497-504
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Konsten J, Rongen M J, Ogunbiyi O A, Darakhshan A, Baeten C G, Williams N S. Comparison of epineural or intramuscular nerve electrodes for stimulated graciloplasty.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 581-586
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Malone P S, Wheeler R A, Williams J E. Continence in patients with spina bifida: long term results.  Arch Dis Child. 1994;  70 433-438
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Cavina E. Outcome of restorative perineal graciloplasty with simultaneous excision of the anus and rectum for cancer. A ten-year experience with 81 patients.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 182-190
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rongen M G, Dekker F A, Geerdes B P, Heinemann E, Baeten C G. Secondary pull-through and double dynamic graciloplasty after miles resection - feasible, but with a high morbidity.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 776-781
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Scott F B, Bradeley W E, Tim G W. Treatment of urinary incontinence by implantable prosthetic sphincter.  Urology. 1973;  1 252-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Leo M E, Barrett D M. Success of the narrow backed cuff design of the AMS800 artificial urinary sphincter: analysis of 144 patients.  J Urol. 1993;  150 1412-1414
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Christiansen J, Sparso B. Treatment of anal incontinence by an implantable prosthetic anal sphincter.  Ann Surg. 1992;  215 383-386
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lehur P A, Roig J V, Duinslaeger M. Artificial anal sphincter: prospective clinical and manometric evaluation.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 1100-11006
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Wong W D, Jensen L L, Bartolo D C, Rothenberger D A. Artificial anal sphincter.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 1345-1351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lehur P A, Michot F, Denis Ph, Orise Ph, Leborgne J, Tenier P P. et al . Results of artificial sphincter in severe anal incontinence. Report of 14 consecutive implantations.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 1352-1355
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Vaizey C J, Kamm M A, Gold D M, Bartram C L, Halligan S, Nicholls R J. Clinical, physiological and radiological study of a new purpose-designed artificial bowel sphincter.  Lancet. 1998;  352 105-109
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 O'Brien P E, Skinner S. Restoring control: the Acticon Neosphincter artificial bowel sphincter in the treatment of anal incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 1213-1216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Jorge J M, Wexner S D. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;  36 77-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Wong W. The ABS clinical trial group . The artificial bowel sphincter - results of a multicenter clinical trial.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 A9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Denkers D, Berg E. Artificial bowel sphincter in the treatment of severe anal incontinence, a four year experience. Vortrag 8th biennial Congress European Council of Coloproctology, Prag 2.5.2001
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Devesa J M, Vicente E, Enriquez J M, Nuno J, Bucheli P, de Blas G. et al . Total fecal incontinence a new method of gluteus maximus transposition: preliminary results and report of previous experience with similar procedures.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 339-349
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Matzel K E, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall F P. Electrical stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence.  Lancet. 1995;  346 1124-1127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Matzel K E, Madoff R, La Fontaine L, Baeten C G, Buie D. The dynamic Graciloplasty Study Group . Complications of dynamic graciloplasty: incidence, management and impact of outcome.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1427-1435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Madoff R, Baeten C G, Christiansen J, Rosen H, Williams N S, Heine J A. et al . Standards for anal sphincter replacement.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 135-141
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Giordano P, Renzi A, Efron J, Gervaz P, Vernava III A, Weiss E. et al . Previous sphincter repair does not effect the outcome of repeat repair.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 A10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Riedel J G, Festge O A. Eine neue Behandlungsmethode bei schwerer Stuhlinkontinenz im Kindesalter.  Chirurg. 1999;  70 935-938
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Ruckauer. Dynamic graciloplasty in children with fecal incontinence: a preliminary report.  J Pediatr Surg. 2001;  7 1036-1039
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Korsgen S, Keighley M R. Stimulated gracilis neosphincter - not as good as previously thought. Report of four cases.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 1331-1333
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Adang E, Engel G L, Rutten F F, Geerdes B P, Baeten C G. Cost-effectiveness of dynamic graciloplasty in patients with fecal incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;  41 725-734
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Whitehead W E, Wald A, Norton N J. Treatment options for fecal incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 131-144
    Google Scholar

E. Berg

Koloproktologische Klinik, Prosper-Hospital

Mühlenstraße 27, 45659 Recklinghausen

Phone: 02361/54-2750

Fax: 02361/54-2756

Email: Eugen.Berg@Prosper-Hospital.de