PDF herunterladen
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002; 06(1): 057-066
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-23164
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

MR Imaging after Surgery for Musculoskeletal Neoplasm

David M. Panicek, Lawrence H. Schwartz
  • Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
26. März 2002 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the current radiologic method of choice for both detecting recurrent musculoskeletal neoplasm after surgical resection and defining its anatomic extent within soft tissue and bone. Various factors (such as the presence of surgical hardware and postsurgical seromas, hematomas, edema, scarring, and anatomic distortion) complicate the interpretation of postoperative MR imaging in these patients. By optimizing the MR imaging protocol, integrating relevant clinical and pathologic information (such as the date and extent of the most recent surgery and the histologic type and grade of the original tumor) during interpretation of the images, and being familiar with the typical manifestations of postsurgical changes and recurrent musculoskeletal tumors, the radiologist can maximize his ability to help guide patient management effectively.

KEYWORD

Musculoskeletal neoplasm - sarcoma - magnetic resonance imaging - postsurgical evaluation

REFERENCES

  • 1 Davis A M, Kandel R A, Wunder J S. The impact of residual disease on local recurrence in patients treated by initial unplanned resection for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity.  J Surg Oncol . 1997;  66 81-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Vanel D, Bittoun J, Tardivon A. MRI of bone metastases.  Eur Radiol . 1998;  8 1345-1351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Eustace S, Goldberg R, Williamson D, Melhem E R, Oladipo O, Yucel E K, Jara H. MR imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopaedic hardware: techniques to minimize susceptibility artefact.  Clin Radiol . 1997;  52 589-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Chang S D, Lee M J, Munk P L, Janzen D L, MacKay A, Xiang Q S. MRI of spinal hardware: comparison of conventional T1-weighted sequence with a new metal artifact reduction sequence.  Skel Radiol . 2001;  30 213-218
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kransdorf M J. The use of gadolinium in the MR evaluation of musculoskeletal tumors.  Top Magn Reson Imag . 1996;  8 15-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 May D A, Good R B, Smith D K, Parsons T W. MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumors and tumor mimickers with intravenous gadolinium: experience with 242 patients.  Skel Radiol . 1997;  26 2-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kransdorf M J, Murphey M D. The use of gadolinium in the MR evaluation of soft tissue tumors.  Semin Ultrasound CT MR . 1997;  18 251-268
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Poon-Chue A, Menendez L, Gerstner M M, Colletti P, Terk M. MRI evaluation of post-operative seromas in extremity soft tissue sarcomas.  Skel Radiol . 1999;  28 279-282
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Verstraete K L, Lang P. Bone and soft tissue tumors: the role of contrast agents for MR imaging.  Eur J Radiol . 2000;  34 229-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Vanel D, Shapeero L G, De Baere T, Gilles R, Tardivon A, Genin J, Guinebretiere J M. MR imaging in the follow-up of malignant and aggressive soft-tissue tumors: results of 511 examinations.  Radiology . 1994;  190 263-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Verstraete K L, Lang P. Post-therapeutic magnetic resonance imaging of bone tumors.  Top Magn Reson Imag . 1999;  10 237-246
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Baur A, Reiser M F. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the musculoskeletal system in humans.  Skel Radiol . 2000;  29 555-562
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Vanel D, Lacombe M J, Couanet D, Kalifa C, Spielmann M, Genin J. Musculoskeletal tumors: follow-up with MR imaging after treatment with surgery and radiation therapy.  Radiology . 1987;  164 243-245
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Davies A M, Vanel D. Follow-up of musculoskeletal tumors. I. Local recurrence.  Eur Radiol . 1998;  8 791-799
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Berger F H, Verstraete K L, Gooding C A, Lang P. MR imaging of musculoskeletal neoplasm.  Magn Reson Imag Clin North Am . 2000;  8 929-951
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Richardson M L, Lough L R, Shuman W P, Lazerte G D, Conrad E U. MR appearance of skeletal neoplasms following cryotherapy.  Skel Radiol . 1994;  23 121-125
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hoeffner E G, Ryan J R, Qureshi F, Soulen R L. Magnetic resonance imaging of massive bone allografts with histologic correlation.  Skel Radiol . 1996;  25 165-170
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kattapuram S V, Rosol M S, Rosenthal D I, Palmer W E, Mankin H J. Magnetic resonance imaging features of allografts.  Skel Radiol . 1999;  28 383-389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Richardson M L, Zink-Brody G C, Patten R M, Koh W J, Conrad E U. MR characterization of post-irradiation soft tissue edema.  Skel Radiol . 1996;  25 537-543
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Panicek D M, Schwartz L S, Heelan R T, Caravelli J F. Non-neoplastic causes of high signal intensity at T2-weighted MR imaging after treatment for musculoskeletal neoplasm.  Skel Radiol . 1995;  24 185-190
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Biondetti P R, Ehman R L. Soft-tissue sarcomas: use of textural patterns in skeletal muscle as a diagnostic feature in postoperative MR imaging.  Radiology . 1992;  183 845-848
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Jelinek J S, Kransdorf M J, Shmookler B M, Aboulafia A J, Malawer M M. Liposarcoma of the extremities: MR and CT findings in the histologic subtypes.  Radiology . 1993;  186 455-459
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Peterson K K, Renfrew D L, Feddersen R M, Buckwalter J A, el-Khoury G Y. Magnetic resonance imaging of myxoid containing tumors.  Skel Radiol . 1991;  20 245-250
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Schweitzer M E, White L M. Does altered biomechanics cause marrow edema?.  Radiology . 1996;  198 851-853
    PubMedGoogle Scholar