Post-ERCP Pancreatitis and Hyperamylasemia: Patient-Related and Operative Risk Factors

Background and Study Aims: Previous studies on the development of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (post-ERCP) hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis have focused on different risk factors, either procedure- or patient-related, and also prognostic factors, such as amylase levels together with the occurrence of pancreatic-type pain, which might be implicated. The aim of this study is to identify possible predictive risk factors and also prognostic factors in order to better organize the treatment strategy.
Patients and Methods: During a 5-year period, 556 ERCP procedures were performed by the same operator. Of these, 43 procedures were excluded from the study. Data recorded from the procedures included both patient characteristics and procedure details. Patients were evaluated for pancreatic-type pain at 4 and 24 h after the procedure, and serum amylase levels were determined at 2 and 24 h after the procedure. Pancreatitis was diagnosed on the basis of both clinical and laboratory examination, while patients with hyperamylasemia were in a normal clinical condition but had high serum amylase levels.
Results: Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred after 17 procedures (3.3 %) and hyperamylasemia after 85 procedures (16.5 %). Patients who developed pancreatitis all had pancreatic-type pain together with amylase levels higher than 4 - 5 times the upper normal limit at 24 h after ERCP. There was a significant association between serum amylase levels and post-procedure pancreatic-type pain both at 4 h and 24 h after ERCP (P = 0.006). Age less than 50 years, history of relapsing pancreatitis, pancreatic duct opacification, and difficulty in obtaining bile duct cannulation all proved to be significant predictive risk factors for the development of either hyperamylasemia or pancreatitis. In contrast, additional procedures and sphincterotomy seemed to reduce the likelihood of both complications.
Conclusions: Serum amylase levels higher than 4 - 5 times the normal upper limit together with the existence of pancreatic-type pain, at 24 h after ERCP, strongly suggest the occurrence of pancreatitis. When any of the predictive risk factors coexist during a procedure it would be better either to abandon the procedure and try again later or, if the situation is urgent, to have earlier recourse to an alternative, such as precut or needle-knife papillotomy.

References

• 1 Lopertido S, Angelini G P, Benedetti G. et al . Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 1-10
• 2 Gottlieb K, Sherman S, Pezzi J. et al . Early recognition of post-ERCP pancreatitis by clinical assessment and serum pancreatic enzymes.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 1553-1557
• 3 Cotton P B, Lehman G, Vennes J. et al . Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 383-393
• 4 Haber G B. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 1
• 5 Freeman M L, Nelson O B, Disario J A. et al . Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 72AB
• 6 Cavallini G, Tittobello A, Frulloni L. et al . Gabexate for the prevention of pancreatic damage related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 919-928
• 7 Hamilton I, Lintott D J, Rothwell J. et al . Acute pancreatitis following endoscopic cholangiopancreatography.  Clin Radiol. 1983;  34 543-546
• 8 Freeman M L, Nelson D B, Sherman S. et al . Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 909-918
• 9 Barkin J S, Casal G L, Reiner D K. et al . A comparative study of contrast agents for endoscopic retrograde pancreatography.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;  86 1437-1441
• 10 Goebel C, Hardt P, Doppl W. et al . Frequency of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with iopromid or iotrolan: a randomized trial.  Eur Radiol. 2000;  10 677-680
• 11 Elta G H, Barnett J L, Wille R T. et al . Pure cut electrocautery current for sphincterotomy causes less post-procedure pancreatitis than blended current.  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1998;  7 (2) 149-153
• 12 Siegel J H, Veerapan A, Tucker R. Bipolar versus monopolar sphincterotomy: a prospective trial.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 1827-1830
• 13 Mehta S N, Pavone E, Barkun J S. et al . Predictors of post-ERCP complications in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 457-463
• 14 Sherman S, Ruffolo T A, Hawes R H. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and non-dilated bile ducts.  Gastroenterology. 1991;  101 1068-1075
• 15 Rabenstein T, Schneider H T, Niklas M. et al . Impact of skill and experience of the endoscopist on the outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 628-636
• 16 Chen V K, Addulian J D, Escalante-Glosky S. et al . Clinical outcome of post-ERCP pancreatitis: relationship to history of previous pancreatitis.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 2120-2123
• 17 Sherman S, Lehman G A. ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis.  Pancreas. 1991;  6 350-367
• 18 Freeman M L. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a review.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 288-297
• 19 Testoni P A, Caparuscio S, Bagnolo F. et al . Twenty-four hour serum amylase predicting pancreatic reaction after endoscopic sphincterotomy.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 (2) 131-136
• 20 Bradley E L. A clinical based classification system for acute pancreatitis.  Arch Surg. 1993;  128 586-590
• 21 La Ferla G, Gordon S, Archibald M. et al . Hyperamylasemia and acute pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Pancreas. 1986;  1 (2) 160-163
• 22 Lavelle M I, Tait N P, Walsh T. et al . Demonstration of pancreatic parenchyma by digital subtraction techniques during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Clin Radiol. 1985;  36 405-407
• 23 Johnson G K, Geenen J E, Johanson J F. et al . Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis: potential causes noted during controlled study of differing contrast media.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1977;  46 217-222
• 24 Baillie J. Complications of endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1994;  26 185-203
• 25 Backman D E, Schiller W R, Anderson M C. Route of retrograde flow in the exocrine pancreas during ductal hypertension.  Arch Surg. 1971;  103 321-329
• 26 Endlund Y, Ekholm R. Microstructure and ultrastructure of the human pancreas.  Acta Chir Scand. 1957;  113 469-471
• 27 Saari A, Kivisaari L, Standertskjold . et al . Experimental pancreatography: a comparison of three contrast media.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1988;  23 53-58
• 28 Gottlieb K, Sherman S. ERCP and endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1998;  8 87-114
• 29 Testoni P A, Bagnolo F, Caporuscio S. et al . Serum amylase measured four hours after endoscopic sphincterotomy is a reliable predictor of postprocedure pancreatitis.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 1235-1241
• 30 Lee J G, Schutz S M, England R E. et al . Endoscopic therapy of sclerosing cholangitis.  Hepatology. 1995;  21 661-667
• 31 Zimmon D S, Falkenstein D B, Riccobono C. et al . Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Gastroenterology. 1975;  69 303-309
• 32 Dickinson R J, Davies S. Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: the role of operative and patient factors.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;  10 423-428
• 33 Steinberg W MSS, Goldstein N D, Davis J. et al . Diagnostic assays in acute pancreatitis: a study of sensitivity and specificity.  Ann Intern Med. 1985;  102 576
• 34 Fox C J, Harry R A, Cairns S R. A prospective series of outpatient endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;  12 523-527