References
1a
Ulven T.
Carlsen PHJ.
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2001,
3367
1b
Majewski M.
Nowak P.
J. Org. Chem.
2000,
65:
5152
1c
Doyle MP.
Tedrow JS.
Dyatkin AB.
Spaans CJ.
Ene DG.
J. Org. Chem.
1999,
64:
8907
1d
Enders D.
Hundertmark T.
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
1999,
751
1e
Enders D.
Prokopenko OF.
Liebigs. Ann.Chem.
1995,
1185
1f
Enders D.
Whitehouse DL.
Runsink J.
Chem.-Eur. J.
1995,
1:
382
1g
Enders D.
Jegelka U.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1993,
34:
2453
1h
Enders D.
Jegelka U.
Dücker B.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1993,
32:
423
1i
Enders D.
Jegelka U.
Synlett
1992,
999
1j
Hirama M.
Noda T.
Itô S.
J. Org. Chem.
1988,
53:
708
2
Enders D.
Ince SJ.
Synthesis
2002,
619
3 For a review of structure and activity see: Blázquez MA.
Bermejo A.
Zafra-Polo MC.
Cortes D.
Phytochem. Anal.
1999,
10:
161
For selected total syntheses see:
4a
Bermejo A.
Tormo JR.
Cabedo N.
Estornell E.
Figadère B.
Cortes D.
J. Med. Chem.
1998,
41:
5158
4b
Bermejo A.
Blázquez MA.
Serrano A.
Zafra-Polo MC.
Cortes D.
J. Nat. Prod.
1997,
60:
1338
4c
Bruns R.
Wernicke A.
Koll P.
Tetrahedron
1999,
55:
9793
4d
Chen W.-P.
Roberts SM.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1999,
103
4e
Dixon DJ.
Ley SV.
Tate EW.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1998,
3125
4f
Friesen RW.
Bissada S.
Can. J. Chem.
1998,
76:
94
4g
Gracza T.
Szolcsanyi P.
Molecules
2000,
5:
1386
4h
Harris JM.
O’Doherty GA.
Tetrahedron
2001,
57:
5161
4i
Mereyala HB.
Gadikota RR.
Indian J. Chem., Sect. B.
2000,
39:
166
4j
Mukai C.
Hirai S.
Hanaoka M.
J. Org. Chem.
1997,
62:
6619
4k
Paddon-Jones GC.
Hungerford NL.
Hayes P.
Kitching W.
Org. Lett.
1999,
1:
1905
4l
Shing TKM.
Tsui H.-C.
Zhou Z.-H.
J. Org. Chem.
1995,
60:
3121
4m
Su YL.
Yang CS.
Teng SJ.
Zhao G.
Ding Y.
Tetrahedron
2001,
57:
2147
4n
Surivet J.-P.
Vatèle J.-M.
Tetrahedron
1999,
55:
13011
4o
Tsubuki M.
Kanai K.
Nagase H.
Honda T.
Tetrahedron
1999,
55:
2493
4p
Yang M.
Li HM.
Zhao G.
Yu QS.
Ding Y.
Chin. J. Chem.
2000,
18:
225
4q
Yang ZC.
Zhou WS.
Heterocycles
1997,
45:
367
4r
Ye JH.
Bhatt RK.
Falck JR.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1993,
34:
8007
4s
Yi XH.
Meng Y.
Hua XG.
Li CJ.
J. Org. Chem.
1998,
63:
7472
For analogue synthesis see:
5a
Bermejo A.
Léonce S.
Cabedo N.
Andreu I.
Caignard DH.
Atassi G.
Cortes D.
J. Nat. Prod.
1999,
62:
1106
5b
Li HM.
Yang M.
Zhou G.
Yu QS.
Ding Y.
Chin. J. Chem.
2000,
18:
388
5c
Mereyala HB.
Gadikota RR.
Joe M.
Arora SK.
Dastidar SG.
Agarwal S.
Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
1999,
7:
2095
5d
Peris E.
Estornell E.
Cabedo N.
Cortes D.
Bermejo A.
Phytochemistry
2000,
54:
311
5e
Shing TKM.
Tai VWF.
J. Org. Chem.
1999,
64:
2140
6a For isolation see: Fang X.-P.
Anderson JE.
Qiu X.-X.
Kozlowski JF.
Chang C.-J.
McLaughlin JL.
Tetrahedron
1993,
49:
1563
6b For semisynthesis and structure revision see: Mukai C.
Yamashita H.
Hirai S.
Hanaoka M.
McLaughlin JL.
Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1999,
47:
131
7
Evans DA.
Hoveyda AH.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1990,
112:
6447
8 All new compounds gave consistent analytical data including correct elemental analysis and/or HRMS.
9
Enders D.
Prokopenko OF.
Raabe G.
Runsink J.
Synthesis
1996,
1095
10 CCDC 179448 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html (or from the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax:+44(1223)336033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
11
Lu L.
Chang H.-Y.
Fang J.-M.
J. Org. Chem.
1999,
64:
843
12 In contrast, the reaction of α-silyl ketone 1 with SmI2 and PhCHO, according to the conditions described for cyclohexanone in ref.
[11]
, was very sluggish and poorly diastereoselective.
13 NMR analysis of ketone 4 confirms it to be in a twist-boat conformation. In this respect a discussion of the reduction selectivity is complicated, as true axial or equatorial attack is no longer applicable in a twist-boat system. Pseudoaxial attack seems possible for both the syn- and anti-aldol products, the latter case may be disfavoured due to the proximity of the electron rich aryl ring and the coordinating Sm species.
14 A range of protic and Lewis acidic hydrolyses, transketalisations and thioketalisation were unsuccessful giving starting material or inseparable mixtures of TBS/acetal deprotection. It is possible that the C-5 alcohol is acting as a general acid.
15 (S,S)-10: See ref.
[9]
16
Paterson I.
Perkins MV.
Tetrahedron
1996,
52:
1811
17 Prepared in two steps from propane-1,3-diol (silylation, Dess-Martin oxidation). Purified by chromatography on silica gel before use.
18 Analytical HPLC (chiral stationary phase) showed that the ee of 1 was carried through to the reduction products with no depreciation. 1 was prepared in up to 96% ee as judged by GC (chiral stationary phase).
19
Evans DA.
Chapman KT.
Carreira EM.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1988,
110:
3560
20
Hundertmark T.
Dissertation
RWTH;
Aachen:
2000.
21
Vicario JL.
Badía D.
Domínguez E.
Rodríguez M.
Carrillo L.
J. Org. Chem.
2000,
65:
3734
22 For a review of use in directed reductions see: Oishi T.
Nakata T.
Acc. Chem. Res.
1984,
17:
338
23
Evans D.
Hoveyda AH.
J. Org. Chem.
1990,
55:
5190
For several theoretical models of substituted 1,3-dioxan-5-ones see:
24a
Artau A.
Ho Y.
Kenttämaa H.
Squires RR.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999,
121:
7130
24b
Wu Y.
Houk KN.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993,
115:
10993
25 For a related examination of substituted 1,3-dioxanes see: Cieplak P.
Howard AE.
Powers JP.
Rychnovsky SD.
Kollman PA.
J. Org. Chem.
1996,
61:
3662
26 For reductions of 4-mono- and 4,6-bis-alkylated 1,3-dioxan-5-ones see: Enders D.
Kownatka D.
Hundertmark T.
Prokopenko OF.
Runsink J.
Synthesis
1997,
649 ; and references 1a-e and 1g
27 In this case the much smaller ligands on boron may make chelate formation much easier. The observed colour change of the reaction, from red to yellow, is consistent with H2 transfer to the Rh(I) catalyst. On closer examination of a model there would appear to be more steric crowding on the lower face of the chelated complex, consistent with the observed outcome.
28 Preparation of 1,3-syn diol 14 (over 2 steps from ketone 11):
To a stirred solution of Cy2BCl
[29]
(2.0 mL, 9.0 mmol, 1.5 equiv) in anhyd Et2O (50 mL) at -78 ºC, under an Ar atmosphere, was sequentially added freshly distilled Et3N (1.42 mL, 10.2 mmol, 1.7 equiv) and a solution of ketone 11 (2.35 g, 6.0 mmol, 1.0 equiv, de = 73%) in anhyd Et2O (20 mL) dropwise via syringe. Stirring was continued at -78 ºC for a further 20 min before warming to 0 ºC for 1 h. The resulting bright yellow suspension was recooled to -78 ºC and a solution of freshly prepared 3-(tert-butyl-diphenyl-silanyloxy)-propionaldehyde (3.45 g, 11.0 mmol, 1.8 equiv) in anhyd Et2O (10 mL) was added dropwise via syringe. Stirring was continued at -78 ºC for a further 90 min before the flask was sealed and allowed to stand in a freezer (-24 ºC) for 10 h. The reaction was quenched with phosphate buffer (pH 7, 120 mL) and extracted. The aq layer was extracted with Et2O and the combined organic portions were concentrated in vacuo. The oily residue was resuspended in phosphate buffer (pH 7, 36 mL) and MeOH (36 mL) and cooled to 0 ºC. Aq H2O2 solution (30%, 18 mL) was added dropwise and the mixture stirred vigorously for a further 1 h. The mixture was poured into phosphate buffer (pH 7, 120 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (4 × 100 mL). The combined organic portions were washed with H2O (50 mL), dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo to give a colourless oil. Purification by chromatography on silica gel (gradient elution: 19:1 → 8:1 pentane:Et2O) gave the title compound 13 (4.94 g, de = 74%) heavily contaminated with aldehyde. An analytical sample (de = 74%) was afforded by further chromatography; [α]25
D +58.9 (c 1.0 in CHCl3); IR (thin film): 3543, 3071, 3050, 3032, 2942, 2891, 2866, 1739, 1472, 1464, 1428, 1383, 1219, 1169, 1112, 1068, 1030 cm-1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.96-1.08 (m, 30 H, CH TIPS, CH3 TIPS and TBDPS), 1.33 (s, 3 H, CH3 acetal), 1.41 (s, 3 H, CH3 acetal), 1.66-1.74 (m, 1 H, CH
aHb), 1.75-1.82 (m, 1 H, CHa
H
b), 3.15 (d, 1 H, J = 3.3 Hz, (CHOH), 3.72 (dd, 1 H, J = 5.9, 1.0 Hz, H-4), 3.74-3.88 (m, 1 H, CH2OTBDPS), 4.06-4.12 (m, 1 H, CHOH), 4.46 (dd, J = 2.8, 1.0 Hz, 1 H, H-6), 5.28 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H, (CH(OTIPS)), 7.20-7.67 (m, 15 H, Ar-H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 12.5 (SiCH(CH3)2), 18.1, 18.2 (SiCH(CH3)2), 19.4 (SiC(CH3)3), 24.0, 24.3 (CH3 acetal), 27.1 (SiC(CH3)3), 34.6 (CH2), 61.6 (CH2OTBDPS), 68.6 (CHOH), 74.4 (CH(OTIPS)), 76.1 (C-4); 80.0 (C-6), 101.5 (acetal C), 127.7, 127.8, 127.9, 128.0, 129.9, 130.0, (Ar-C), 133.7, 133.8 (Ar-C, ipso), 135.8 (Ar-C), 140.2 (Ar-C, ipso), 209.5 (C=O); MS (CI): m/z (%)= 350(4), 349(16), 313(56), 263(100), 235(62), 175(13); HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C19H29O4Si [M+ - C22H31O2Si]: 349.1835. Found: 349.1835. Anal. Calcd for C40H60O6Si (705.08): C, 69.84; H, 8.85. Found: C, 69.29; H, 8.60.
To a stirred suspension of NaBH4 (2.70 g, 70 mmol, 2.0 equiv) in anhyd Et2O (210 mL) under an Ar atmosphere, at r.t., was added a solution of ZnCl2 in Et2O (Aldrich, 1.0 M, 35 mL, 35 mmol, 1.0 equiv) via syringe. The resulting white suspension was stirred for a further 2 d before allowing the precipitate to settle. The resulting clear supernatant solution of Zn(BH4)2 in Et2O (ca. 0.14 M) was cooled to -78 ºC.
To a stirred solution of the crude ketone 13 (4.21 g, ca 5.97 mmol, 1.0 equiv) at -78 ºC, under an Ar atmosphere, was added the chilled supernatant solution of Zn(BH4)2 in Et2O (ca 240 mL, ca 34 mmol, 5.6 equiv), via double-ended needle over 45 min. The reaction mixture was warmed very slowly to r.t. The reaction mixture was quenched after 24 h with H2O until effervescence ceased (ca 5 mL) and stirred vigorously for 1 h. The resulting white suspension was filtered through Celite® and the filter-cake washed thoroughly with Et2O (400 mL). The combined filtrates were washed with sat. aq NaHCO3 solution and the aq portion back-extracted with Et2O (200 mL). The combined organic portions were dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo to give a cloudy colourless oil. Purification by chromatography on silica gel (gradient elution: 6:1 → 1:1 pentane:Et2O gave the title compound 14 (3.67 g, 87%, 52% ds, 74% de for reduction). On smaller scales a reduction de of 85% could be achieved; IR (thin film): 3472, 3071, 3050, 3031, 2943, 2892, 2866, 1471, 1463, 1428, 1380, 1224, 1198, 1172, 1112, 1069, 1029 cm-1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.95-1.10 (m, 30 H, CH TIPS, CH3 TIPS and TBDPS), 1.21 (s, 3 H, CH3 acetal), 1.39 (s, 3 H, CH3 acetal), 1.70-1.81 (m, 2 H, CH2), 3.14 (d, 1 H, J = 2.5 Hz, CHOH), 3.59 (ap t, 1 H, J = 5.5 Hz, H-4), 3.70 (dd, J = 4.7, 3.0 Hz, 1 H, H-6), 3.78-3.90 (m, 2 H, CH2OTBDPS), 3.92-3.97 (m, 1 H, CHOH), 4.09-4.13 (m, 1 H, H-5), 4.45 (d, 1 H, J = 3.6 Hz, 5-OH), 5.16 (d, 1 H, J = 4.7 Hz, CH(OTIPS)), 7.24-7.46 (m, 10 H, Ar-H), 7.63-7.67 (m, 5 H, Ar-H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 12.7 (SiCH(CH3)2), 18.2 (× 2) (SiCH(CH3)2, 19.4 (SiC(CH3)3), 24.1, 25.5 (CH3 acetal), 27.2 (SiC(CH3)3), 34.5 (CH2), 63.2 (CH2OTBDPS), 69.7 (C-5), 72.4 (CHOH), 73.8 (C-6), 77.7 (CH(OTIPS)), 78.6 (C-4), 101.3 (acetal C), 127.1, 127.9 (× 2), 128.3 (× 2), 130.0 (Ar-C), 133.2, 133.3 (Ar-C, ipso), 135.7, 135.8 (Ar-C)], 141.3 (Ar-C, ipso); MS (CI): m/z (%) = 709(9) [MH+ + 1], 534(54), 476(41), 458(29), 235(10), 175(100), 163(15); HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C38H55O6Si2 [M+ - C3H7]: 663.3537. Found: 663.3534.
29 Prepared from the hydroboration of freshly distilled cyclohexene with monochloroborane dimethyl sulfide complex (Aldrich). For a procedure see: Cowden CJ.
Paterson I. In Organic Reactions
Vol. 51:
Paquette LA.
Wiley;
New York:
1997.
p.1