Background and Study Aims: Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), also known as virtual colonoscopy, is a recently introduced imaging modality for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance of CTC in a blinded comparison with conventional colonoscopy.
Patients and Methods: A total of 66 consecutive, symptomatic patients underwent spiral computed tomography (CT) examination after standard bowel preparation. CT images were analyzed and subsequently compared with conventional colonoscopy findings.
Results: Conventional colonoscopy detected 15 colorectal carcinomas and 52 polyps. CTC correctly identified all carcinomas, 13 of 14 polyps greater than 10.0 mm (sensitivity 92.8 %; 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI); 77 - 100), 11 of 13 polyps between 6.0 and 9.0 mm (sensitivity 84.6 %; 95 % CI; 62 - 100), and six of 25 polyps smaller than 5.0 mm (sensitivity 24 %; 95 % CI; 6 - 42). The per-patient sensitivity and specificity were 93.7 % and 94.1 %, respectively.
Conclusions: Computed tomographic colonography is an accurate imaging modality for the detection of colorectal neoplasia, especially for lesions larger than 6.0 mm in diameter.
References
1
Fenlon H M, Nunes D P, Schroy P C. et al .
A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.
N Engl J Med.
1999;
341
1496-1503
2
McFarland E G, Brink J A.
Helical CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): the challenge that exists between advancing technology and generalizability.
Am J Roentgenol.
1999;
173
549-559
3
Beaulieu C F, Napel S, Daniel B L. et al .
Detection of colonic polyps in a phantom model: implications for virtual colonoscopy data acquisition.
J Comput Assist Tomogr.
1998;
22
656-663
4
Dachman A H, Lieberman J, Osnis R B. et al .
Small simulated polyps in pig colon: sensitivity of CT virtual colography.
Radiology.
1997;
203
427-430
5
Fenlon H M, Nunes D P, Clarke P D, Ferrucci J T.
Colorectal neoplasm detection using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study.
Gut.
1998;
43
806-811
6
Hara A K, Johnson C D, Reed J E. et al .
Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomography colography: feasibility of a novel technique.
Gastroenterology.
1996;
110
284-290
7
Hara A K, Johnson C D, Reed J E. et al .
Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity.
Radiology.
1997;
205
59-65
8
Johnson C D, Hara A K, Reed J E.
Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for detecting colorectal neoplasms.
Endoscopy.
1997;
29
454-461
9
Johnson C D, Ahlquist D A.
Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy) a new method of colorectal screening.
Gut.
1999;
44
301-305
10
Kay C L, Kulling D, Hawes R H. et al .
Virtual endoscopy - comparison with colonoscopy in the detection of space-occupying lesions of the colon.
Endoscopy.
2000;
32
226-232
11
Fenlon H M, McAneny D B, Nunes D P. et al .
Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon.
Radiology.
1999;
210
423-428
12
Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M. et al .
Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy.
Am J Roentgenol.
1999;
173
561-564
13
Morrin M M, Kruskal J B, Farrell R J. et al .
Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy.
Am J Roentgenol.
1999;
172
913-918
14
Morrin M M, Farrell R J, Raptopoulos V. et al .
Role of virtual computed tomographic colonography in patients with colorectal cancers and obstructing colorectal lesions.
Dis Colon Rectum.
2000;
43
303-311
15
Vining D J, Gelfand D W, Bechtold R E. et al .
Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality (abstract).
Am J Roentgenol.
1994;
62 (Suppl.)
104
16
Adloff M, Arnaud J P, Bergamaschi R, Schloegel M.
Synchronous carcinoma of the colon and rectum: prognostic and therapeutic implications.
Am J Surg.
1989;
157
299-302
17
Ekelund F J.
Multiple carcinomas of the colon and rectum.
Cancer.
1974;
33
1630-1634
18
Langevin J M, Nivatvongs S.
The true incidence of synchronous cancer of the large bowel.
Am J Surg.
1984;
124
63-66
19
Tate J JT, Rawlinson J, Royle G T. et al .
Preoperative or postoperative colonic examination for synchronous lesions in colorectal cancer.
Br J Surg.
1988;
75
1016-1018
20
Dachman A H, Kuniyoshi J K, Boyle C M. et al .
CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps.
Am J Roentgenol.
1998;
171
989-995
21
Rex D K.
Virtual colonoscopy: time for some tough questions for radiologists and gastroenterologists.
Endoscopy.
2000;
32
260-263
22
Gazelle G S, McMahon P M, Scholz F J.
Screening for colorectal cancer.
Radiology.
2000;
215
327-335
23
Royster A P, Fenlon H M, Clarke P D. et al .
CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.
Am J Roentgenol.
1997;
169
1237-1242
24
Chen S C, Lu D SK, Hecht J R, Kadell B M.
CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions.
Am J Roentgenol.
1999;
172
595-599
25
Hara A K, Johnson C D, Reed J E. et al .
Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography.
Am J Roentgenol.
1997;
168
1181-1184
26
Hu H.
Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction.
Med Phys.
1999;
26
5-18
27
Klingenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T. et al .
Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications.
Eur J Radiol.
1999;
31
110-124
28
Hu H, He H D, Foley W D, Fox S H.
Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed.
Radiology.
2000;
215
55-62
29
Rex D K, Cutler C S, Lemmel G T. et al .
Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
Gastroenterology.
1997;
112
24-28
30
Rex D K, Vining D, Kopecky K K.
An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
50
309-313
Dr. A. Laghi
Department of Radiology II, University of Rome - La Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I
Via Salaria 334 · 00199 Rome · Italy
Fax: + 39-06-490243
Email: andrea.laghi@uniroma1.it