J Reconstr Microsurg 2002; 18(6): 503-508
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-33322
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Extended Rat-Ear Flap Model: A New Rodent Model for Studying the Effects of Vessel Supercharging on Flap Viability

David T.W. Chiu1,2,3 , Guoli Hu3 , June Wu4 , Sam Rhee3 , Leif Rogers3 , Neal Gorlick3
  • 1Center for Restorative Surgery, New York, NY
  • 2Institute for Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY
  • 3Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • 4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Albert Einstein College and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 August 2002 (online)

Zoom Image

ABSTRACT

A new extended rat-ear flap model, with both an axial and a random component, is described. The flap is based on an axial supply by the posterior auricular artery and the posterior facial vein. The random portion, consisting of the rat dorsum, is capable of being supercharged at two separate sites-in the scapular and pelvic regions. There are several advantages to this composite flap. It is a combined axial and random flap. When used as a free flap, the viability of the axial portion serves as an indicator for anastomotic patency. The random portion allows for the investigation of the effects of pharmaceutical manipulation or surgical intervention, e.g., flap supercharging. The results indicate that the axial supply alone can cover approximately 50 percent of the extended rat-ear flap. Moreover, adding supercharging perforators to the random portion significantly increases the area of flap survival. Of interest, an axial vascular supply, coupled with more distal dorsal perforators (pelvic) than proximal (scapular) perforators, may increase survival for the so-called ``watershed'' area in the middle of the random portion of the flap.

Additionally, this study also investigated the relative importance of arterial supply vs. venous drainage, using the extended rat-ear flap model. The flap was either supercharged with both the perforators of the scapular and pelvic arteries, or both scapular and pelvic veins. The results of the study suggests that augmenting venous drainage provides statistically significant improvement (87 percent vs. 51.6 percent) in increasing flap survival, when compared to augmenting the arterial supply. Arterial supercharging provided no improvement in flap survival, when compared to no supercharging (axial vessels + arterial supercharging, 51.6 percent vs. axial vessels alone, 49.9 percent). The results also suggest that providing adequate venous outflow is more important than providing additional arterial blood, and that impaired venous outflow may contribute to some cases of flap failure. However, it should be kept in mind that the best flap survival occurs with both arterialand and venous supercharging.

Crossref Cited-by logo
Article Citations