Background and Study Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of respiratory-triggered three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (3D-MRCP) for the detection of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and to compare the specific findings of magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with PSC.
Patients and Methods: The MRCP findings were evaluated in 150 patients with clinical symptoms (progressive fatigue, pruritus followed by icterus) and/or elevated values for alkaline phosphatase and serum aspartate transaminase, and occasionally an elevated serum concentration of bilirubin as a sign of cholestasis, who were consecutively referred for magnetic resonance imaging. Two observers independently classified bile duct abnormalities and established the MRCP diagnosis in a consensus reading. The results of MRCP were compared with the definitive diagnosis, which was based on the clinical history and laboratory and histological data, as well as on endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) findings. In a second step, the observers compared the delineation of the biliary system and morphological findings using MRCP and ERCP in patients with confirmed PSC.
Results: Diagnostic examinations were obtained in 146 of the 150 MRCPs (97 %). The diagnosis of PSC was confirmed by clinical data and ERCP in 34 of these 150 patients (23 %). The sensitivity and specificity of MRCP for diagnosing PSC were 88 % (29 of 33) and 99 % (108 of 109), respectively. MRCP and ERCP yielded similar scores for the delineation of the biliary system (P = 0.2) in patients with PSC. However, different bile duct abnormalities leading to the diagnosis of PSC were depicted by MRCP and ERCP; more bile duct stenoses and pruning were seen with ERCP and more skip dilatation with MRCP (P < 10-4 ).
Conclusion: In patients with PSC, MRCP is a highly sensitive method and its diagnostic accuracy is comparable to that of ERCP.
References
1
Porayko M K, LaRusso N F, Wiesner R H.
Primary sclerosing cholangitis: a progressive disease?.
Semin Liver Dis.
1991;
11
18-25
2
Lee J G, Schutz S M, England R E. et al .
Endoscopic therapy of sclerosing cholangitis.
Hepatology.
1995;
21
661-667
3
Harrison P M.
Diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.
1999;
6
356-360
4
Okolicsanyi L, Fabris L, Viaggi S. et al .
Primary sclerosing cholangitis: clinical presentation, natural history and prognostic variables: an Italian multicentre study. The Italian PSC Study Group.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
1996;
8
685-691
5
LaRusso N F, Wiesner R H, Ludwig J, MacCarty R L.
Current concepts: primary sclerosing cholangitis.
N Engl J Med.
1984;
310
899-903
6
MacCarty R L, LaRusso N F, Wiesner R H, Ludwig J.
Primary sclerosing cholangitis: findings on cholangiography and pancreatography.
Radiology.
1983;
149
39-44
7
Craig D A, MacCarty R L, Wiesner R H. et al .
Primary sclerosing cholangitis: value of cholangiography in determining the prognosis.
Am J Roentgenol.
1991;
157
959-964
8
Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G. et al .
Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1998;
48
1-10
9
Pedersen J H, Christensen R F, Juul N, Burcharth F.
Comparison of ultrasonography and transhepatic cholangiography in the evaluation of obstructive jaundice.
RöFo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Nuklearmed.
1985;
143
41-43
10
Testoni P A, Caporuscio S, Bagnolo F, Lella F.
Twenty-four-hour serum amylase predicting pancreatic reaction after endoscopic sphincterotomy.
Endoscopy.
1999;
31
131-136
11
Oberholzer K, Lohse A W, Mildenberger P. et al .
Diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: prospective comparison of MR cholangiography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.
Röfo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr.
1998;
169
622-626
12
Ito K, Mitchell D G, Outwater E K, Blasbalg R.
Primary sclerosing cholangitis: MR imaging features.
Am J Roentgenol.
1999;
172
1527-1533
13
Ernst O, Asselah T, Sergent G. et al .
MR cholangiography in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Am J Roentgenol.
1998;
171
1027-1030
14
Fulcher A S, Turner M A, Franklin K J. et al .
Primary sclerosing cholangitis: evaluation with MR cholangiography - a case-control study.
Radiology.
2000;
215
71-80
15
Angulo P, Pearce D H, Johnson C D. et al .
Magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with biliary disease: its role in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
J Hepatol.
2000;
33
520-527
16
Haider M A, Bret P M.
The role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
J Hepatol.
2000;
33
659-660
17
Vitellas K M, Keogan M T, Freed K S. et al .
Radiologic manifestations of sclerosing cholangitis with emphasis on MR cholangiopancreatography.
Radiographics.
2000;
20
959-975
18
Hintze R E, Adler A, Veltzke W. et al .
Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Endoscopy.
1997;
29
182-187
19
Soto J A, Barish M A, Yucel E K, Ferrucci J T.
MR cholangiopancreatography: findings on 3D fast spin-echo imaging.
Am J Roentgenol.
1995;
165
1397-1401
20
Terada T, Nakanuma Y.
Intrahepatic cholangiographic appearance simulating primary sclerosing cholangitis in several hepatobiliary diseases: a postmortem cholangiographic and histopathological study in 154 livers at autopsy.
Hepatology.
1995;
22
75-81
21
Hart R, Classen M.
Complications of diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Endoscopy.
1990;
22
229-233
22
Soto J A, Yucel E K, Barish M A. et al .
MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP.
Radiology.
1996;
199
91-98
23
Adamek H E, Weitz M, Breer H. et al .
Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Endoscopy.
1997;
29
741-744
24
Fulcher A S, Turner M A, Capps G W, Zfass A M, Baker K M.
Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.
Radiology.
1998;
207
21-32
25
Regan F, Schaefer D C, Smith D P. et al .
The diagnostic utility of HASTE MRI in the evaluation of acute cholecystitis: half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo SE.
J Comput Assist Tomogr.
1998;
22
638-642
26
Hirohashi S, Hirohashi R, Uchida H. et al .
Pancreatitis: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography in children.
Radiology.
1997;
203
411-415
27
Ichikawa T, Nitatori T, Hachiya J, Mizutani Y.
Breath-held MR cholangiopancreatography with half-averaged single shot hybrid rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequence: comparison of fast GRE and SE sequences.
J Comput Assist Tomogr.
1996;
20
798-802
28
Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigame T. et al .
MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences.
Am J Roentgenol.
1996;
166
1297-1303
29
Beuers U, Spengler U, Sackmann M. et al .
Deterioration of cholestasis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in advanced primary sclerosing cholangitis.
J Hepatol.
1992;
15
140-143
30
Baluyut A R, Sherman S, Lehman G A. et al .
Impact of endoscopic therapy on the survival of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
53
308-312
31
Angulo P, Lindor K D.
Primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Hepatology.
1999;
30
325-332
32
Lee S G, Lee Y J, Park K M. et al .
One hundred and eleven liver resections for hilar bile duct cancer.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.
2000;
7
135-141
33
Revelon G, Rashid A, Kawamoto S, Bluemke D A.
Primary sclerosing cholangitis: MR imaging findings with pathologic correlation.
Am J Roentgenol.
1999;
173
1037-1042
H. J. Textor, M.D.
Bonn University Hospital
Sigmund Freud Strasse 25 · 53127 Bonn · Germany ·
Fax: + 49-228-287 5598
eMail: textor@uni-bonn.de